UN Atomic Watchdog Agency Reports Stalemate Over Iran’s Nuclear Programme
Lacking “the necessary level of transparency and cooperation,” the United Nations atomic watchdog agency reiterated yet
again today that it could not provide assurances that Iran’s nuclear programme is solely for the peaceful purpose of
generating energy and not for producing nuclear bombs.
“The current situation remains somewhat of a stalemate,” UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General
Mohamed ElBaradei told the agency’s Board of Governors in presenting his latest report on Iran’s nuclear programme, noting that the case was
in aᾠclass of its own because of Tehran™s two decades of unῤeclared activities in breach of its obligations under
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty NPT.
“The Agency has been able to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran. However, we continue to be
unable to reconstruct fully the history of Iran’s nuclear programme and some of its components, because we have not been
provided with the necessary level of transparency and cooperation on the part of Iran,” he sῡid.
“We have not seen concrete proof of the diversion of nuclear material, nor the industrial capacity to produce
weapon-usable nuclear material, which is an important consideration in assessing the risk. However, quite a few
uncertainties still remain about experiments, procurements and other activities relevant to our understanding `f the
scope and nature of Iran™s programme. This renders the Agency unable to provide the required assurance about the
peaceful nature of Iran™s nuclear programme, he added.
He termed Iran’s insistence on linking its readiness to resolve IAEA concerns to actions by the Security Council, which
has already imposed sanctions and is considering further measures “difficult to understand,” and called for the
resumption of negotiations between Tehran and all relevant parties.
“I remain convinced that only through negotiation can a comprehensive and durable solution be attained to the Iranian
nuclear question and other issues related to it,” he said.
Iran insists its programme is purely for energy production but many other countries maintain it is for making weapons,
and in December the Council imposed limited sanctions and called on Tehran to suspend uranium enrichment. In the IAEA
report, Mr. ElBaradei noted that despite this Iran had continued enrichment, which can produce fuel for generating
electricity or, at a much higher level, making nuclear bombs.
It was the discovery in 2003 of Iran’s hidden activities that gave rise to the current crisis, as Mr. ElBaradei stressed
today. “The IAEA’s confidence about the nature of Iran’s programme has been shaken because of two decades of undeclared
activities,” he said.
“This confidence will only be restored when Iran takes the long overdue decision to explain and answer all the Agency’s
questions and concerns about its past nuclear activities in an open and transparent manner. Until that time, the Agency
will have no option but to reserve its judgment about Iran’s nuclear programme, and as a reslt the international
community will continue to express concern.
Mr. ElBaradei painted a more positive picture on another area of major IAEA concern, the nuclear programme of the
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), noting the DPRK’s agreement at diplomatic talks in Beijing last month to
shut down and eventually abandon its Yongbyon nuclear facility.
The agreement envisions the return of IAEA personnel to conduct necessary monitoring and verification after they were
ordered out four years ago when the DPRK withdrew from the NPT. The DPRK also invited Mr. ElBaradei to visit.
“I welcome the Beijing agreement, and the invitation to visit the DPRK, as positive steps towards the denuclearization
of the Korean Peninsula, and towards the normalization of the DPRK’s relationship with the Agency,” he said.
ENDS