Gladstone, Queensland Tuesday May 8, 2001: As the CSIRO launches its most devastating report on climate change impact in
Australia, Greenpeace is attempting to halt the first shipment from Australia’s worst new source of greenhouse pollution
– shale oil.
Eight people - swimmers and divers - have been arrested trying to stop the oil carrier Probo Emu from loading the first
shipment of oil from the experimental Stuart Oil Shale Project, at Gladstone, next to the Great Barrier Reef World
Heritage Area.
Greens senator Bob Brown has joined the protest. He says, “Climate change threatens us all. Our scientists are telling
us we need to act, yet the Howard government is wasting $240 million of taxpayers money to prop up the shale oil
industry. If we want to save the climate we need to shut this industry down and switch to clean energy.”
Greenpeace climate campaigner Shane Rattenbury says “If we want to protect Australia from the devastating floods,
droughts and rising temperatures that the CSIRO has predicted, this dirty fossil fuel industry must be stopped.”
“The CSIRO is predicting up to 6 degree average temperature rise if we keep depending on fossil fuels. Clean renewable
fuels such as bio- diesel for cars and trucks and solar or wind for electricity can give us the energy we need, without
adding to climate change. There’s no future in the shale oil industry. It’s not sustainable environmentally or
financially.”
Last month its joint venture partner, Suncor, pulled out amid concerns about the plant’s technical breakdowns, financial
and environmental problems. The plant is now solely operated by Australian twin mining companies Southern Pacific
Petroleum and Central Pacific Minerals.
Rattenbury says “Experienced business players, CSIRO scientists, local residents and the Australian public
are alarmed by the deadly consequences of climate change. Greenpeace urges the government and investors to act on
climate change by getting out of the Stuart Project immediately.”
Key facts
The Stuart Shale Oil Project is more than 1 year behind schedule and is $50m over budget.
Financial Analysts Innovest project greenhouse abatement could cost $50m to $200m a year at commercial production
levels.
A Greenpeace poll last month found that 80% of Australians surveyed support ratification of the Kyoto protocol even
without the US