New Reports on GE Crops
Physicians and Scientists for Responsible Genetics applaud the independent report released this week by the UK Soil
Association (SA).
This report, together with that of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) released in June, substantiates the need for
an extended moratorium on GE field trials and commercial releases.
The SA report shows that engineered soybeans, corn and canola have cost the US economy up to US$12 billion since 1999:
lower crop prices, loss of export orders, product recalls. Higher profits have not eventuated. Contamination of food and
farming has created major difficulties. US agriculture is buoyed up by subsidies: US$190 billion more promised over the
next decade.
The USDA report, The Adoption of Bio-engineered Crops ( http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/aer810/), was undertaken by their Economic Research Service and concluded that "perhaps the biggest issue raised by these
results is how to explain the rapid adoption of GE crops when farm financial impacts appear to be mixed or even
negative."
A 1998 study, funded by Iowa State University, revealed the uptake of GE crops can be driven by farmers believing
industry claims that the crops will deliver - just as much as by factual data of actual crop performance. It confirmed
that over 50 percent of farmers planted herbicide-tolerant GE soya because they believed it would produce higher yields
than conventional varieties. Analysis showed the opposite to be true.
A subsequent study confirmed that "there is essentially no difference in costs between the tolerant and non-tolerant
fields" but higher yields from non-GE crops meant a profit for growers.