by BRONWEN BEECHEY
A Housing NZ complex in Christchurch
As of March 2021, there were 23,688 applicants on the waiting list for social housing in NZ, an increase of 45 per cent
from the same time last year.1 To qualify for social housing, you must be a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident, or recognised as a refugee or
protected person by Immigration NZ; and in most cases have income under $655.41 per week after tax if you are single
with no dependents, or $1008.33 after tax if you have a partner or children. You must also be considered to be in
“serious housing need”, a category which is decided by Work and Income, which took over the assessment of social housing
eligibility from Housing NZ in 2014.2 (In 2019, Housing NZ was merged with its development subsidiary HLC and the Kiwibuild Unit from the Ministry of Housing
to create Kainga Ora - Homes and Communities).
Behind the statistics, there are thousands of people who are being forced into substandard living conditions and
unaffordable rentals due to the interpretation of “serious housing need” by Work and Income. Those who are lucky enough
to be considered in serious housing need face months of waiting in emergency accommodation, mostly in motels which are
not intended to be long-term living situations.
As a community social worker in South Auckland, a large portion of my work involves helping people through the confusing
maze of applying for social housing. The people I work with are Maori, Pasifika or recent migrants. They are either on
benefits or low-paying and insecure jobs. Typically, they have large families which often include parents or other
relatives. Many do not speak English as their first language. There are often health issues, intimate partner violence
and breakdown of family relationships, and a reluctance to discuss these issues with strangers. When a family or
individual contacts our agency, they are often at a crisis point. They may be a woman and her children escaping a
violent partner, or a family who have been living in overcrowded accommodation with relatives who have told them to
leave. They may also be a young person who has been kicked out by family because of pregnancy, sexuality or resisting
strict parenting.
The first step is to ask Work and Income to find emergency accommodation. For families, this is usually fairly
straightforward, and they will be placed in a motel, usually on the same day. With single people, Work and Income will
generally say that motels are only available for families and that the person should try to find a lodge or boarding
house to stay at. This usually results in an argument with Work and Income about why a lodge, as well as being generally
substandard accommodation, is not a safe place for a single woman or a transgender teenager to be in. In most cases,
Work and Income will then place the person in a motel. However, people without children who approach Work and Income
directly for help with accommodation will often be told to find a boarding house or lodge, and given no other options.
Emergency accommodation is booked for seven days. Before the seven days is up, the person or family has to contact Work
and Income, then tell them what efforts they have made to find private rental accommodation (even if they have been
assessed as eligible for social housing). If the Work and Income case manager is satisfied, the emergency accommodation
is extended for another seven days. According to MSD figures, in December 2020, 3,807 households were in emergency
accommodation, 1,941 of them including children. A total of 4,031 children were living in motels as of 31 December 2021,
with more than 1000 living there for up to one year. From October 2020, people in emergency housing have 25 per cent of
their income deducted after the first seven days. This is despite the amount of money paid by MSD to motel owners to
provide emergency accommodation - $1m per day according to recent reports.3
People in emergency accommodation are told to look online for properties, regardless of whether they have access to the
internet or know how to use it. They are expected to view properties even if the rent is unaffordable. Pressure is often
put on people to apply for rental properties that are unaffordable or substandard. A colleague of mine recently assisted
a sole parent who had been pressured by Work and Income into taking a rental costing $700 per week, which was cold, damp
and had holes in the walls and other damage.
Once people take a rental, they are taken off the social housing waitlist because they are no longer considered to be in
“serious housing need”. One of the families I work with was encouraged by Work and Income to take a private rental
property which was not adequately heated, after the landlord promised to install a heat pump. Several months later, the
heat pump has still not been installed and the couple’s young child is getting sick and has been hospitalised several
times with bronchiolitis. When we tried to get the family back on the social housing waitlist, they were declined
because they were in the rental property. A roof over your head is considered sufficient, unless you are about to be
evicted or someone is seriously ill.
For those who stay in emergency accommodation, the next step is transitional housing. Transitional housing is run by
social housing providers which are contracted to the Ministry of Social Development. There are a number of transitional
housing complexes in South Auckland that are purpose-built with a good standard of accommodation of varying sizes,
however, some are motels that have been leased or purchased by the housing provider and are not always well-maintained.
Transitional housing is provided for 12 weeks and often longer. The provider is meant to provide a “wrap-around” service
to help families to either move to social housing or private rentals. The reality is that many providers struggle to
provide the help that is required, due to staffing shortages and the sheer volume of numbers they are working with, who
frequently have complex needs.
Another issue with both emergency and transitional housing is the restrictions on visitors. While accommodation
providers need to ensure the safety of residents, young people particularly find the restrictions difficult as they want
to socialise with friends and family; and the need for Maori and Pacific families to maintain whanau and family
connections is also undermined.
Faced with this obstacle course of finding permanent accommodation, many people just give up and remain in substandard
conditions, sleeping in garages and living rooms, living in cars or vans, or couch-surfing around friends and relatives.
While the number of homes being built by Kainga Ora has increased under Labour, it is not enough to meet the need. Many
of the new builds are medium-to-high-density apartments and townhouses, which are not adequate for larger families.
Accessible housing for those with disabilities is even harder to find.
The housing situation in Aotearoa New Zealand is beyond crisis - it is fundamentally broken. It is the result of years
of neglect and ideological opposition to public housing, combined with structural racism and neoliberal capitalism. As
described elsewhere in this issue by Ani White, the concept of housing as an investment rather than a human right has
not been challenged in any real way by Jacinda Arden’s government.
The first Labour government responded to the housing crisis of the 1930s by a massive building effort that also created
jobs for those made unemployed by the Depression. There is no reason why, with new technologies available, that many
more homes could not be built now, and that these homes would be environmentally sustainable, good quality and provide
options for single people, smaller families, larger families and multi-generational households. The only reasons that
this is not happening is the reluctance of the Labour government to do anything that might upset the wealthy property
developers and slumlords, and the absence of a mass movement that can pressure them to do so. There are a number of
reasons why this hasn’t occurred - the disruption caused by Covid19, the overwhelming demands on housing services, and
in some cases, reluctance to upset the government that provides funding for organisations providing housing services.
Hopefully these barriers to demanding a massive increase in public housing and rent controls on private rentals can be
overcome.
1 MSD Housing Register March 2021. https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/statistics/housing/index.html
2MSD, “Who can get public housing” https://workandincome.govt.nz/housing/find-a-house/who-can-get-public-housing.html
3 Radio New Zealand (9/3/2021) Emergency housing: $1m-a-day spend a “disgrace” - National https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/438001/emergency-housing-1m-a-day-spend-a-disgrace-national
The author is a social worker working for an NGO in South Auckland.