ANNE TOLLEY AND DAMIEN O'CONNOR.
www.frontpage.co.nz has all our video and transcripts.
________________________________________
SEX OFFENDERS' REGISTER BY 2014
Police and Corrections Minister Anne Tolley hopes to have introduced a sex-offenders register by 2014.
Speaking this weekend on ‘The Nation’, Mrs Tolley said she would be taking the proposal to cabinet next year with a
system in place soon after.
The Minister has just returned from a trip to Europe where she took part in discussions around implementing a
sex-offenders register.
“I particularly wanted to have a look at how it works in Britain. What I've found is actually a very strong management
system of violent and sex offenders. What my concern was, what made me have a look at it in New Zealand was the fact
that you know I think we have a good regime and I've certainly tightened it up about how we managed our offenders while
they're on parole or while they're on supervision. But at the end of their sentence they disappear off into our
communities and we really lose track of them.”
“I've given a heads up to both the Commissioner and to the Corrections chief executive that I want to have a look and do
some work on this. It's a big piece of work because it means we have to look at the whole regime again, but I think it's
the right thing to do, because I know there's huge community concern that these people are living out in our communities
and we don’t know where they are.”
She said the register would only be accessed by Government departments to keep track of known sex offenders.
”So there are requirements on those offenders almost for the rest of their life that they register that we know where
they are, we know when there's any major changes in their life that may trigger more offending. So it is a long term
management regime for these really very difficult people who cause considerable grief to members of our community. This
keeps track of them, this keeps a management regime in place for as long as you need too.”
O'CONNOR FEELS 'SOMEWHAT GUILTY' OVER PIKE RIVER
West Coast MP Damien O’Connor says if re-elected the Labour Party would make “major’ changes to the current mining
legislation.
Speaking this weekend on ‘The Nation’, Mr O’Connor said he is currently looking at a new members’ bill to ensure
corporate responsibility and liability.
“Where you have directors of a company who knowingly ignore health and safety issues, then they should be liable, they
should be responsible and that we need to implement the Queensland and New South Wales mining regulations immediately.
Now I'm guessing the government should be working on that now. I'm looking at private member's bill to do that. Yes as
incoming Labour government I'm sure that we will do everything to make major change to that 92 Act and to give better
protection to miners be they need it.”
Mr O’Connor said he too could have done more to ensure tragedies like the Pike River Mine explosion did not happen.
“Well can I say that yeah I too feel somewhat guilty, maybe I should have marched in the street or done something to get
across the point in a little more stronger fashion. I think that the reality is in hindsight many of us believe we
should have done more to highlight the dangers, that only a few experienced miners truly knew. I'm not a coalminer I
couldn’t make judgement on what was safe or what wasn't, we relied on experts and unfortunately as this report
identifies the experts or so called experts in the Department of Labour didn’t have the skills to make the judgement,
and that’s something that we have to change and move, and that’s what the families are looking for, is major change to
prevent such a terrible tragedy happening in the future.”
However, he said the culture of deregulation by the then National Government is to blame.
“I think there's been a major culture change in the mining industry, and why I've pointed the finger at Solid Energy,
they were part of the process of deregulation in 1992, we had a National government determined to deregulate anything
they could get their hands on, they deregulated electricity, they deregulated housing, and mine safety. What happened
was that the companies were happy to accept that, they got rid of the experienced miners, they got younger guys in who
were enthusiastic, they didn’t know the dangers and the lessons of history and in fact the company was happy to carry on
with that lowering their costs, not having the oversight of mine safety that was necessary.”
“The culture in the Department of Labour said that people sitting on their backsides in Wellington knew better than the
people at the coalface. There had been a consistent under resourcing of people at the coalface, the Mines Inspectors,
the Inspectorate that ran right through, and that the advice to ministers, both in the previous National government and
our own, in my view was deficient, and they were determined to say that you could run a safety regime from Wellington,
when in fact what we needed were people on the ground. No eventually that message got through and we took action. It did
unfortunately you know take a couple of deaths to spark that, and yes we could have done better, but the fact is that
the current minister, or the one that’s just resigned had warnings, direct warnings from that internal review.”
________________________________________