INDEPENDENT NEWS

The Real Cost Of Greenhouse Target

Published: Tue 11 Aug 2009 09:39 AM
ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION ORGANISATIONS of NZ Inc.
Wellington – Monday 10 August 2009
The Real Cost Of Greenhouse Target
Government Greenhouse target relies on misleading presentation of costs: New Zealanders will still be better off
The government is misleading people into thinking that they will be $30 on average worse off than they now with the greenhouse gas target when in fact they will still be much better off said the Environment and Conservation Organisations of NZ
The Infometrics and NZIER study of the costs of greenhouse gas emissions reductions was not always clear on the cost reference in the Executive Summary, but on Friday Adolf Stroombergen, in presenting the study at Victoria University made it very clear.
ECO Spokesperson, Cath Wallace said, what they really found is that in 2025, we will on average in New Zealand be $16,000 better off than we are now with emissions reduction; and $18,000 better off than now without – in the unlikely event that the rest of the world lets us getting away with shirking.
“Dr Smith is making people think they will be worse off in future if we take action on climate change, and that is not true.  We will be markedly better off, either way, even with a price of carbon of $100 and a variety of assumptions run through a model.”
Adolf Stroombergen, in presenting his paper, gave the following figures for average Gross Disposable National Income:
“2009: $38,500 per capita
            2025: $56,000 per capita
            2025: ≈$54,000 per capita with $100/tonne CO2.”
“The models that Infometrics and NZIER used, have a number of flaws, incorporated no costs of climate change or of retaliatory action by other countries if New Zealand shirks its duty to cut emissions.”
“The 10-20% emissions reduction that Dr Smith and the government is well short of the UK binding emissions reduction target of 33%, and much less than the 25%-40% commitments made by developed countries in Bali.”
“Dr Smith is misleading people into thinking they will be $30 week worse off than they are now when in fact they will be very much better off.”
ends

Next in New Zealand politics

Christopher Luxon - Pre-Budget Speech To Auckland Business Chamber
By: New Zealand Government
New Zealand Supports UN Palestine Resolution
By: New Zealand Government
Greens Welcome Cross-party Approach To Climate Adaptation
By: Green Party
Climate Change – Mitigating The Risks And Costs
By: New Zealand Government
Protest March Against Fast-track Bill Announced For Auckland
By: Greenpeace
Wellington Mayor Responds To Housing Minister’s District Plan Decision
By: Wellington Office of the Mayor
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media