INDEPENDENT NEWS

Unison Networks Ltd v Commerce Commission

Published: Mon 10 Sep 2007 11:16 AM
Supreme Court of New Zealand
10 September 2007
Unison Networks Ltd v Commerce Commission SC 12/2007 [2007] NZSC 74
PRESS SUMMARY
This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.
Supreme Court judgement
The Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Unison Networks Ltd which challenged the validity of decisions taken by the Commerce Commission in 2003 and 2004 as regulator of electricity lines businesses.
Legislation passed in 2001 required the Commerce Commission to put in place a regime for regulation of the 29 regional electricity lines businesses in New Zealand which operate as regional monopolies. The regulatory scheme provides a targeted regime for the imposition of price control on those businesses which the Commission decides require control.
The scheme provides for the Commission to set “thresholds” as part of a process for identifying any such businesses. If a lines business, in the course of its trading, breaches any threshold, the Commission must inquire into and decide whether price control should be imposed on it.
The Commission’s initial price threshold set in 2003 required that lines businesses make no increases in their price levels for a period of 20 months.
Its second price threshold allowed price movements within a stipulated price path. Unison challenged the lawfulness of both thresholds in judicial review proceedings.
The Court of Appeal decided that the first threshold was unlawful. That part of the decision was challenged by the Commission and has been overruled by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision that the second threshold was lawful. The overall effect of these findings is that Unison’s appeal was dismissed. Unison has been ordered to pay $25,000 costs to the Commerce Commission.
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

On Whether This Election Is Already A Foregone Conclusion
By: Gordon Campbell
Newshub-Reid Research Poll Shows National Rising But Labour Still Governing Alone
By: Mediaworks
SFO Files Charges In Relation To NZ First Foundation Donations
By: Serious Fraud Office
Business Leaders’ Confidence Tanks As Top Kiwi CEOs Vent Their Frustrations
By: New Zealand Media and Entertainment
Taking Action To Reduce Waste And Plastics
By: New Zealand Labour Party
On Last Night’s Leaders Debate
By: Gordon Campbell
Dunne Speaks: The Election Campaign Just Grinds Slowly On And On
By: Peter Dunne
Electoral Commission: Candidate And Party Lists Released
By: Electoral Commission
National Releases Its Plan To Restore NZ’s Prosperity
By: New Zealand National Party
The 2020 New Zealand Election Is Not A Foregone Conclusion.
By: Keith Rankin
Overseas Voting Starts On Wednesday
By: Electoral Commission
Politicians To Go Head To Head On Education Issues In Election Debate
By: NZEI Te Riu Roa
New Zealand First Fully Exonerated Of All SFO Charges
By: New Zealand First Party
Links to two judgments in the SFO's NZ First Foundation case
By: New Zealand High Court
Green Party Responds To NZ First Foundation SFO Charges
By: Green Party
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media