INDEPENDENT NEWS

Labour moves to toughen up Nat’s boy racer bill

Published: Tue 20 Oct 2009 02:48 PM
Clayton Cosgrove
Law and Order Spokesperson
MP for Waimakariri
20 October 2009Media Statement
Labour moves to toughen up National’s boy racer bill
Labour law and order spokesperson Clayton Cosgrove has tabled an amendment to the Vehicle Confiscation and Seizure Bill making it compulsory to confiscate a vehicle permanently after two street racing offences within four years no matter who owns the vehicle.
“The Judith Collins bill is big on talk in terms of crushing cars, but it actually misses a great opportunity in terms of penalising persistent offenders,” Clayton Cosgrove says.
“Labour has said all along it welcomes the Bill’s provision that closes a loophole in the existing legislation by allowing a vehicle owned by a third party to be confiscated.
“That’s good, but this advance is undermined by making confiscation a discretionary matter for the court for the third-party owned vehicles. That’s not closing a loophole, that’s leaving a loophole wide open,” Clayton Cosgrove said.
"Mandatory confiscation should come into effect after two offences within four years, whether or not the boy racer theoretically owns the vehicle or not. The third party owner would be alerted on the first offence that the next time the car is used to do a burnout or a similar offence, then the car will be permanently seized.
“The Collins bill is not about making the law tougher on boy racers. It is about a new clause that allows boy racer cars to be crushed on a third offence. Labour does not support car crushing because innocent taxpayers will end up paying.
“You don’t need the crushing clause --- which is all about creating a photo opportunity for Judith Collins some time in the future --- if the car has already been permanently confiscated after two offences. Crushing may be good for one politician’s ego, but by giving boy racers a third chance, it perpetuates the problem.
“What communities under siege from boy racers need is not egotistical boasting from the minister, but tough action from the courts in enforcing confiscation.”
The supplementary order paper can be viewed at:
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/sop/members/2009/0073/latest/whole.html#dlm2456201
ENDS

Next in New Zealand politics

Fast-track Approvals Bill Presents A Serious Risk To New Zealand Exporters
By: Environmental Defence Society
New Lab To Help Protect Key Pacific Tuna Fisheries
By: New Zealand Government
Ruawai Leader Slams Kaipara Council In Battle Over $400k Property
By: Susan Botting - Local Democracy Reporter
Another ‘Stolen Generation’ Enabled By Court Ruling On Waitangi Tribunal Summons
By: Te Pati Maori
Die In for Palestine Marks ANZAC day
By: Peace Action Wellington
Penny Drops – But What About Seymour And Peters?
By: New Zealand Labour Party
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media