Elizabeth Warren Could Use Some Elizabeth Peacen
December 11, 2014
Why people want to become fans of a senator rather than pushing senators to serve the public is beyond me.
Why people want to distract and drain away two years of activism, with the planet in such peril, fantasizing about
electing a messiah is beyond me.
And when people who've chosen as their messiah someone who isn't even running for the office they're obsessed with,
respond to criticism with "Well, who else is there?" -- that makes zero sense. They've made the list and could make it
differently.
But here's what's really crazy about talking to Elizabeth-Warren-For-Presidenters. If you complain that she hasn't
noticed the military budget yet, they tell you that doing so would cost her the election. And when you reject that
contention, they tell you that wars are just one little issue among a great many.
Now, when Congress was cooking up a Grand Bargain to solve the debt "crisis," people who were polled almost universally
rejected any of the acceptable solutions under consideration, such as smashing Social Security. Instead, they said they
wanted the rich taxed and the military cut. When pollsters at the University of Maryland show people the federal budget,
a strong majority wants big cuts to the military. This is nothing new. People favor cutting war spending. People who
elected Obama believed (falsely) that he intended to cut the military.
A different and more substantiated argument would be that turning against military spending would cost Warren the
support of wealthy funders and the tolerance of media gatekeepers. But that does not seem to be the argument that
Warren-For-Presidenters make.
It's the "just one issue among many" thing that's truly nuts. Look at this:
Click for big version.
One little item makes up over half the discretionary budget, the things a Senator votes to spend money on or not spend
money on. Does Warren think this massive investment in war preparation is too much, too little, or just the right
amount? Who the hell knows? Can anyone even be found who cares?
The cost of one weapons system that doesn't work could provide every homeless person with a large house.
A tiny fraction of military spending could end starvation at home and abroad.
The Great Student Loan Struggle takes place in the shadow of military spending unseen in countries that simply make
college free, countries that don't tax more than the United States, countries that just don't do wars the way the U.S.
does. You can find lots of other little differences between those countries and the U.S. but none of them on the
unfathomable scale of military spending or even remotely close to it.
Financially, war is what the U.S. government does. Everything else is a side show.
In the typical U.S. Congressional election, the military budget is never mentioned by any candidate or commentator. But
surely it's fair to ask Senator Warren, with her great interest in financial questions and economic justice, whether she
knows the military budget exists and what she thinks of it.
As far as I know, nobody has asked her. When asked about Israel bombing families, she literally ran away. When asked again, she gave her support to the mass killing.
When a candidate is never asked about a subject, most people simply imagine the candidate shares their own view. This is
why it's important to ask.
Of course, many people actually think that war is only one little issue among many others and that, for example, funding
schools is totally unrelated to dumping over half the budget into a criminal enterprise. To them I say, please look
carefully at the graphic above.
*************
David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio.