Iran Must Get Ready to Repel a Nuclear Attack
, January 24, 2007
In the overall flow of information coming from the Middle East, there are increasingly frequent reports indicating that
within several months from now the US will deliver nuclear strikes on Iran. For example, citing well-informed but
undisclosed sources, the Kuwaiti Arab Times wrote that the US plans to launch a missile and bomb attack on the territory
of Iran before the end of April, 2007. The campaign will start from the sea and will be supported by the Patriot missile
defense systems in order to let the US forces avoid a ground operation and to reduce the efficiency of the return strike
by “any Persian Gulf country”.
“Any country” mostly refers to Iran. The source which supplied the information to the Kuwaiti paper believes that the US
forces in Iraq and other countries of the region will be defended from any Iranian missile strikes by the frontier
So, the preparations for a new US aggression entered the completion phase. The executions of S. Hussein and his closest
associates were a part of these preparations. Their purpose was to serve as a “disguise operation” for the efforts of
the US strategists to deliberately escalate the situation both around Iran and in the entire Middle East.
Analyzing the consequences of the move, the US did order to hang the former Iraqi leader and his associates. This shows
that the US has adopted irreversibly the plan of partitioning Iraq into three warring pseudo-states – the Shiite, the
Sunnite, and the Kurdish ones. Washington reckons that the situation of a controlled chaos will help it to dominate the
Persian Gulf oil supplies and other strategically important oil transportation routes.
The most important aspect of the matter is that a zone of an endless bloody conflict will be created at the core of the
Middle East, and that the countries neighboring Iraq – Iran, Syria, Turkey (Kurdistan) – will inevitably be getting
drawn into it. This will solve the problem of completely destabilizing the region, a task of major importance for the US
and especially for Israel. The war in Iraq was just one element in a series of steps in the process of regional
destabilization. It was only a phase in the process of getting closer to dealing with Iran and other countries, which
the US declared or will declare rouge.
However it is not easy for the US to get involved in yet another military campaign while Iraq and Afghanistan are not
“pacified” (the US lacks the resources necessary for the operation). Besides, protests against the politics of the
Washington neocons intensify all over the world. Due to all of the above, the US will use nuclear weapon against Iran. This will be the second case of the use of nuclear weapons in combat after
the 1945 US attack on Japan.
The Israeli military and political circles had been making statements on the possibility of nuclear and missile strikes
on Iran openly since October, 2006, when the idea was immediately supported by G. Bush. Currently it is touted in the
form of a “necessity” of nuclear strikes. The public is taught to believe that there is nothing monstrous about such a
possibility and that, on the contrary, a nuclear strike is quite feasible. Allegedly, there is no other way to “stop”
How will other nuclear powers react? As for Russia, at best it will limit itself to condemning the strikes, and at worst
– as in the case of the aggression against Yugoslavia – its response will be something like “though by this the US makes
a mistake, the victim itself provoked the attack”.
Europe will react in essentially the same way. Possibly, the negative reaction of China and several other countries to
the nuclear aggression will be stronger. In any case, there will be no retaliation nuclear strike on the US forces (the
US is absolutely sure of this).
The UN means nothing in this context. Having failed to condemn the aggression against Yugoslavia, the UN Security
Council effectively shared the responsibility for it. This institution is only capable to adopt resolutions which the
Russian and also the French diplomacy understands as banning the use of force, but the US and British ones interpret in
exactly the opposite sense – as authorizing their aggression.
Speaking of Israel, it is sure to come under the Iranian missile strikes. Possibly, the Hezbollah and the Palestinian
resistance will become more active. Posing as victims, the Israelis will resort to provocations to justify their
aggression, suffer some tolerable damage, and then the outraged US will destabilize Iran finally, making it look like a
noble mission of retribution.
Some people tend to believe that concerns over the world’s protests can stop the US. I do not think so. The importance
of this factor should not be overstated. In the past, I have spent hours talking to Milosevic, trying to convince him
that NATO was preparing to attack Yugoslavia. For a long time, he could not believe this and kept telling me: “Just read
the UN Charter. What grounds will they have to do it?”
But they did it. They ignored the international law outrageously and did it. What do we have now? Yes, there was a
shock, there was indignation. But the result is exactly what the aggressors wanted – Milosevic is dead, Yugoslavia is
partitioned, and Serbia is colonized – NATO officers have set up their headquarters in the country’s ministry of
The same things happened to Iraq. There were a shock and indignation. But what matters to the Americans is not how big
the shock is, but how high are the revenues of their military-industrial complex.
The information that a second US aircraft-carrier is due to arrive at the Persian Gulf till the end of January makes it
possible to analyze the possible evolution of the war situation. Attacking Iran, the US will mostly use air delivery of the nuclear munitions. Cruise missiles (carried by the US aircrafts as well as ships and submarines) and, possibly, ballistic missiles will
be used. Probably, nuclear strikes will be followed by air raids from aircraft carriers and by other means of attack.
The US command is trying to exclude a ground operation: Iran has a strong army and the US forces are likely to suffer
massive casualties. This is unacceptable for G. Bush who already finds himself in a difficult situation. It does not
take a ground operation to destroy infrastructures in Iran, to reverse the development of the country, to cause panic,
and to create a political, economic and military chaos. This can be accomplished by using first the nuclear, and
subsequently the conventional means of warfare. Such is the purpose of bringing the aircraft carrier group closer to the
What resources for self-defense does Iran have? They are considerable, but incomparably inferior to the US forces. Iran
has 29 Russian Tor systems. Definitely, they are an important reinforcement of the Iranian air defense. However, at
present Iran has no guaranteed protection from air raids.
The US tactics will be the same as usual: first, to neutralize the air defense and radars, and then to attack aircrafts
in the air and on land, the control installations, and the infrastructure, while taking no risks.
Within weeks from now, we will see the informational warfare machine start working. The public opinion is already under
pressure. There will be a growing anti-Iranian militaristic hysteria, new information leaks, disinformation, etc.
At the same time all of the above sends a signal to the pro-Western opposition and to a fraction of Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad’s elite to get ready for the coming developments. The US hopes that an attack on Iran will inevitably result
in a chaos in the country, and that it will be possible to bribe some of the Iranian generals and thus to create a fifth
column in the country.
Of course, Iran is very different from Iraq. However, if the aggressor succeeds in instigating a conflict between the
two branches of the Iranian armed forces – the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps and the army – the country will find
itself in a critical situation, especially in case at the very beginning of the campaign the US manages to hit the
Iranian leadership and delivers a nuclear strike or a massive one by conventional warfare on the country’s central
Today, the probability of a US aggression against Iran is extremely high. It does remain unclear, though, whether the US
Congress is going to authorize the war. It may take a provocation to eliminate this obstacle (an attack on Israel or the
US targets including military bases). The scale of the provocation may be comparable to the 9-11 attack in NY. Then the
Congress will certainly say “Yes” to the US President.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the
text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research
articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
For media inquiries: email@example.com
© Copyright Leonid Ivashov , Strategic Cultural Foundation (Russia) , 2007