Startling new revelations highlight rare Congressional hearings on Ohio vote
December 13, 2004
Startling new revelations about Ohio's presidential vote have been uncovered as Democratic members of the House
Judiciary Committee join Rev. Jesse Jackson in Columbus, the state capital, on Monday, Dec. 13, to hold a rare field
hearing into election malfeasance and manipulation in the 2004 vote. The Congressional delegation will include Rep. John
Conyers (D-MI), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, and others.
Taken together, the revelations show Republicans – in state and county government, and in the Ohio Republican Party –
were determined to undermine and suppress Democratic turnout by a wide variety of methods.
The revelations were included in affidavits gathered for an election challenge lawsuit filed Monday at the Ohio Supreme
Court. Ohio's Republican Electoral College representatives are also to meet at noon, Monday, at the State House, even
though the presidential recount, requested by the Green and Libertarian Parties, is only beginning the same day.
On Sunday, John Kerry spoke with Rev. Jesse Jackson and urged him to take an more active role in investigating the
irregularities and ensuring a fair and impartial recount. Kerry said there were three areas of inquiry that should be
addressed: 92,000 ballots that recorded no vote for president; qualifying and counting provisional ballots; and
supported an independent analysis of the software and set-up of the optical scan voting machines.
What follows are excerpts from some of the affidavits for the election challenge.
- In Warren County, where election officers declared a homeland security emergency on Election Day, and barred reporters
and others from watching the vote count, it now has been revealed that county employees were told the previous Thursday
they should prepare for the Election Day lockdown. That disclosure suggests the lockdown was a political decision, not a
true security risk. Moreover, statements also describe how ballots were left unguarded and unprotected in a warehouse on
Election Day, and they were hastily moved after county officials received complaints.
- In Franklin County, where Columbus is located, the election director, Matt Damschroder, misinformed a federal court on
Election Day when he testified the county had no additional voting machines – in response to a Voting Rights Act lawsuit
brought by the state Democratic Party that minority precincts were intentionally deprived of machines. It now appears as
many as 81 voting machines were being held back, out of 2,866 available, according to recent statements by Damschroder
and Bill Anthony, the chairman of the Franklin County Board of Elections. The shortage of machines in Democratic-leaning
districts lead to long lines and thousands of people leaving in frustration and not voting. Damschroder's contradictory
statements raise the possibility of perjury.
- Also in Franklin County, a worker at the Holiday Inn observed a team of 25 people who called themselves the "Texas
Strike Force" using payphones to make intimidating calls to likely voters, targeting people recently in the prison
system. The "Texas Strike Force" members paid their way to Ohio, but their hotel accommodations were paid for by the
Ohio Republican Party, whose headquarters is across the street. The hotel worker heard one caller threaten a likely
voter with being reported to the FBI and returning to jail if he voted. Another hotel worker called the police, who came
but did nothing.
- In Knox County, students at Kenyon College, a liberal arts school, stood in line for up to 11 hours, because only one
voting machine was in use. However, at nearby Mt. Vernon Nazarene University, there were ample voting machines and no
lines. This suggests the GOP shorting of voting machines was a more widespread tactic than just targeting inner-city
neighborhoods.
- Reports in sworn affadavits affirm numerous instances of direct official interference with the right to vote. In
Warren County, Democrats were being targeted and forced to use provisional ballots, even if they had proper
identification. These ballots were then subjected to more rigorous standards to be counted than were other ballots. In a
half-dozen precincts in Franklin County, people who were not inside polling places by 7:30 PM were told to leave - even
if they had waited in line for hours. This is a violation of the Voting Rights Act. Sworn affidavits also confirmed
reports of old voter rolls being used, meaning that new voters were not on the list and would be given provisional
ballots, if allowed to vote at all.
Affidavits were also filed in support of the election challenge suit raising questions about manipulating exit poll
results and computer tabulation of county and statewide votes.
In one exit poll affidavit, Jonathan David Simon, an expert witness, notes that at 12:53 a.m. the exit polls altered the
projected winner – even though the same number of votes had been cast. "Although each update reports the same number of
respondents (872), the reported results differ significantly, with the latter (12:53 a.m.) exit poll results apparently
having been brought into congruence with the tabulated vote results." In other words, the exit polls were made to
conform to a political decision to declare Bush the victor.
Another exit poll affidavit, filed by Ron Paul Baiman, an economist and statistician at the University of Illinois and
University of Chicago, said the swing in national exit poll results, recorded at 12:33 a.m., when Kerry was winning with
50.8 percent of the vote, to Bush winning with 51.2 percent, was, "in lay terms, impossible."
"This is more than a 100 percent swing in the other direction of the exit poll margin, he said. "There is less than a
one in 25,000,000 (1/25,507,308) chance of this occurring."
Another affidavit by Richard Hayes Phillips, a geomorphology Ph.D. from University of Oregon with a special expertise in
spotting anomalous data, found dramatic examples of erroneous voting patterns – with votes taken away from Kerry - that
can only be explained by computer manipulation.
For instance, in 16 precincts in Cleveland, he found votes that were shifted from Kerry to other candidates. In at least
30 precincts, there was ultra-low voter turnout reported – as low as 7.1 percent or 13.05 percent – and seven entire
wards where total turnout was below 50 percent. He writes, "Kerry won Cleveland with 83.27 percent of the vote to 15.88
percent for Bush. If voter turnout were really 60 percent of registered voters, as seems likely based on turnout in
other major cities of Ohio, rather than 49.89 percent as reported, Kerry's margin of victory in Cleveland has been
wrongly reduced by 22,000 votes."
Phillips points to other counties where has says "there is compelling evidence of fraud." In Miami County early on
election night, when 31,620 votes had been counted, and later, when 50,235 votes were counted, "Kerry had exactly the
same percentage, 33.92 percent, and the percentage for George Bush was almost exactly the same, dropping by 0.03 percent
from 65.80 to 65.77 percent. The second set of returns gave Bush a margin of exactly 16,000 votes, giving cause to
question the integrity of the central counting device for the optical scan machines. "
He cites many other examples, but summarizes his findings: "It is my professional opinion that John Kerry's margins of
victory were wrongly reduced by 22,000 votes in Cleveland, by 17,000 votes in Columbus, and by as many as 7,000 votes in
Toledo. It is my further professional opinion that John Kerry's margins of defeat in Warren, Butler, and Clermont
Counties were inflated by as many as 37,000 votes in the aggregate, and in Miami County by as many as 6,000 votes. There
are still 92,672 uncounted regular ballots that, based upon the analysis set forth of the election results from Dayton
and Cincinnati, may be expected to break for John Kerry by an overwhelming margin. And there are still 14,441 uncounted
provisional ballots."
*************
-- Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of OHIO'S STOLEN ELECTION: VOICES OF THE
DISENFRANCHISED, 2004, upcoming from www.freepress.org.