Distribution via the Unanswered Questions Wire
Sign up for the wire at:
Unanswered Questions : Thinking for ourselves.
Public Pressure Forces Judge to Open 9/11 Whistleblower Hearing -- A
Victory for Accountability and Transparency
News and Commentary by Kyle F. Hence -- April 27, 2004
Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds could soon become the thorniest of thorns in the side of the most secretive administration
in American history. Whether she does or not depends on whether or not the American public will stand up and challenge
the Department of Justiceís attempt to quash the truth, avoid accountability and bury the facts behind lies, double
speak and the National Security trump card.
Edmonds, showing such courage in the face of such stacked decks, deserves to be supported in her growing campaign to see
that her first amendment rights as an American citizen are honored and that someone is held accountable at the FBI and
elsewhere for the gross negligence or worse she uncovered as an FBI translator in the months immediately following the
9/11 attacks. [For background, please see other stories on Edmonds posted on this site: www.911citizenswatch.org]
The first victory in this effort occurred yesterday when the U.S. District Court proceedings previously ësealadí (closed
to the public and press) were forced open after members of the public and press confronted the court and then U.S.
Marshals directly challenging the unjustified and undocumented order for official secrecy regarding the Edmonds case
that morning. The hearing in the courtroom of Bush appointed Judge Reggie Walton was scheduled to be closed but in an
apparent bow to vocal objections brought by a former CIA agent, a foreign print journalist, the author of this account
and Edmondsí lawyer, the Judge elected to open the doors and allow public and press scrutiny of the proceedings.
Upon hearing the news, former Bush I official, Catherine Austin Fitts, who helped orchestrate a grass-roots lobbying
campaign, with the 9/11 Visibility Project, in support of Sibel Edmonds, said that this was a case in which citizen and
press demands for transparency won out over the strong arm of the Department of Justice and the Courtís effort to keep
all hidden behind closed doors. "Itís a great victory. Donít underestimate your power," said Fitts.
Edmonds is the latest in a string of FBI whistleblowers, including Colleen Rowley and Robert Wright, who have come
forward before and since 9/11 with damning evidence and allegations which taken together show a disturbing pattern of
spiked and compromised investigations and investigative or intelligence assignments of the most junior or incompetent of
agents to the most important of charges.
A suspicious public, as they pay increasing attention to the mountain of questions surrounding the official 9/11
investigation, and witness its official obstruction, have begun to understandably entertain the unsettling notion that
rogue elements within the FBI or elsewhere within the government, sufficiently high in office, may have been complicit
in the 9/11 plot; that it would either have been exposed and prevented had it not been for certain actions which many
suggest add up to a damning pattern indeed. Others simply insist that the lack of transparency, the resulting lack of
accountability and the rewarding of failure and gross incompetence is inimical to a healthy functioning democracy as it
perpetuates a cancerous, life-endangering ëbusiness as usual.í
Either way a hard nosed investigation and much greater public attention to these issues is what is required to
effectively challenge a dissembling ëofficial storyí and ferret out the truth. Currently, despite the spin, this is not
what we are getting. In the absence of an uncompromising hardball official investigation it is incumbent upon those
actively concerned to support and effect a Citizensí Truth Commission and pertinent to the story at hand, support the
few brave souls willing to put their necks on the lines to tell the truth as they know itóthe 9/11 whistleblowers like
Sibel Edmonds.
While no one source or single Whistleblower will reveal the whole story, Sibel Edmondsí case is quite instructive
because it addresses the fundamental suggestions supported by a growing body of publicly acknowledged evidence that the
government had quite specific forewarnings and detailed intelligence threats including the notion of planes being used
as weapons and did so months in advance of 9/11; and yet did little or nothing.
In addition, Edmonds has exhibited unusual courage in calling a spade a spade when she directly accused Condoleezza Rice
of lying regarding the extent of warnings. If she is fully supported we may see an important precedent and example set
which could inspire others ëin the knowí to speak out. As they do, independent researchers and citizens investigators
will be able to ëconnect the dotsí themselves and in time the whole story will emerge, truth will see the light of day
and accountability and transparency will win out over obfuscation, secrecy and denials.
Given the extraordinary secrecy, and in the Edmonds case, the extremely rare application of State Secrets ëImmunityí we
may never know be able to confirm her allegation that the FBI had specific threat intelligence as to rough timing,
targets and method. But foreign press accounts [see www.cooperativeresearch.org] and indeed the public record as
reflected in the Congressional Joint Inquiry report already demonstrate that the government knew far more than they
initially acknowledged in their early deceptive comments regarding the extant of pre-attack intelligence and threat
assessments.
Playing the National Security trump card may just be the governmentís attempt to protect the now unaccountable and avoid
embarrassment. However, we do know enough to continue to press for full disclosure, continue to connect the dots on our
own. Something the government is doing everything in its power in the Edmonds case to prevent.
In the end, despite pleading and arguments made by counsel Allan Gerson on behalf the 9/11 Families and their lawsuit,
the U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton quashed the current deposition subpoena that would have had Edmonds
testifying today [Tuesday, April 27th] before the lawyers for several thousand family members who has suing those they
believe are behind terrorism. However, given the need for further review of the case, and perhaps the new public and
press scrutiny, Judge Walton did set a date (June 14th) for another hearing and decision on whether to allow her
deposition in some form. With this much advance time there is more than enough opportunity to rally a large public
audience who would be willing to show Sibel Edmonds a very strong show of support and in the process help this
disturbing information reach more Americans who deserve to know.
*******************
Andrew B. of the Independent was there….
Lawyers try to gag FBI worker over 9/11
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington -- 26 April 2004
The Bush administration will today seek to prevent a former FBI translator from providing evidence about 11 September
intelligence failures to a group of relatives and survivors who have accused international banks and officials of aiding
al-Qa'ida.
Sibel Edmonds was subpoenaed by a law firm representing more than 500 family members and survivors of the attacks to
testify that she had seen information proving there was considerable evidence before September 2001 that al-Qa'ida was
planning to strike the US with aircraft. The lawyers made their demand after reading comments Mrs Edmonds had made to
The Independent.
But the US Justice Department is seeking to stop her from testifying, citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".
Today in a federal court in Washington, senior government lawyers will try to gag Mrs Edmonds, claiming that disclosure
of her evidence "would cause serious damage to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States".
***************
STANDARD DISCLAIMER FROM UQ.ORG: UnansweredQuestions.org does not necessarily endorse the views expressed in the above
article. We present this in the interests of research -for the relevant information we believe it contains. We hope that
the reader finds in it inspiration to work with us further, in helping to build bridges between our various
investigative communities, towards a greater, common understanding of the unanswered questions which now lie before us.