Media release
Academic Freedom Aotearoa
2 April 2014
Academic Freedom Aotearoa condemns attempt to silence staff at Lincoln University
Lincoln University staff received an email from the university's communications team today instructing them to not
respond to media requests for comment on proposed restructuring plans.
Tertiary Education Union Lincoln branch president, Stuart Larsen said that "this was a surprise to us. It appears to
imply that academic staff have to ask them for permission to exercise their civil and academic rights."
The effects of the earthquakes in Canterbury continue to have massive financial implications for the polytechnical
institutes and universities of the region. These institutions are struggling to find solutions but have been unable to
avoid forced redundancies.
"We are told that staff are from time to time being pressured to not respond to requests for comment from the media. To
suggest that staff cannot make comment without permission might be a breach of their rights and obligations under the
Education Act," said Prof. Jack Heinemann, co-chair of Academic Freedom Aotearoa (AFA).
The United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), of which New Zealand is a founding member, says unequivocally that "higher-education teaching personnel are entitled…to express freely their opinion about the institution or system
in which they work, freedom from institutional censorship…".
"While no staff or students can speak for the university without the authority of the vice-chancellor, it may be
reasonable for some staff and students of the university to make informed and responsible comment on internal events at
the university."
"We encourage our AFA members at Lincoln to consider whether the comments they wish to make should be associated with
their appointment at the university. However, media managers and policy do not have greater authority than the Education
Act or New Zealand's international obligations to UNESCO," Heinemann said.
"To serve as critic and conscience of society is often an uncomfortable experience. It carries risk of retribution. The
risk never higher than when the critique is aimed at your own employer. AFA exists in part to challenge those who create
risk for academic staff and students expressing informed and responsible critique of social relevance, no matter who is
being criticised."
"The conditions in Canterbury remain challenging. The staff of the universities continue to deliver world class learning
opportunities for students and perform high impact research. There are none who have let the earthquakes prevent them
from meeting their obligations to society.
"Likewise, they will not allow the events to be used as an excuse to unjustly censure or stifle them. Their obligations
to serve as critic and conscience are as prominent in the Education Act as are teaching and research. Neither
earthquakes nor managers will keep academic staff and students from their duties," concluded Heinemann.
"We encourage the university to explain their position to staff and community. We also fully support our members in
their right to act in their positions and capacity as the critics and conscience of society," Larsen said.