The final report of the dramatic Senate inquiry into the Sterling Income Trust fiasco reveals how the federal corporate
regulator and WA consumer protection agency betrayed 130 elderly and vulnerable victims. They have been left financially
ruined, 20 have passed away and many others are terminally and chronically ill, and they all face eviction and
homelessness. In response to the evidence, one participant in the inquiry, One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts, issued
the following clear recommendation:
“All factors considered, including ASIC’s regulatory negligence, and the advanced age and vulnerability of the Sterling
and Silverlink tenant victims who are being evicted, the Commonwealth Government, which is responsible for ASIC and its
regulatory philosophy, should immediately compensate the 130 victims for the full $18.554 million they lost, plus
interest and expenses.”
Senator Roberts’ recommendation is the only reasonable, and indeed moral, response to the evidence presented to the
inquiry. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission Chairman, Joe Longo, complained during the hearings that
it was a big inquiry for a relatively small corporate collapse, but the reason for the inquiry was that the Sterling
collapse revealed the systemic failings of ASIC, and that they were by design. ASIC’s operational philosophy, called caveat emptor—let the buyer beware—is that it isn’t responsible for policing the financial system, whereas Australian consumers
assume that it is. The inquiry heard evidence that even when ASIC took action against the Sterling Group for false and
misleading promotions, it didn’t bother to adequately inform consumers of its concerns, so Sterling was able to lure in
even more victims before its final collapse. Although both ASIC, and the federal government that is responsible for its
operational philosophy, should admit liability in this case, they won’t; however, common decency and good will dictate
that the government should immediately make an Act of Grace payment through the Department of Finance, which doesn’t
require admission of liability, to fully compensate the victims so these elderly, sick and dying victims are not forced
out of their homes in their final years.
Major parties major fail
Senator Roberts’ participation in the Sterling inquiry demonstrates why it is so important to have minor parties in the
Parliament who are not obligated to the major vested interests that manipulate politics. The biggest of these are the
banks, which employ an army of lobbyists to patrol the halls of Parliament, and have revolving doors through which
officials pass back and forth from key government and party positions to plum jobs in the banks. It is the banks that
want to keep ASIC weak and ineffective as a regulator, and the two major parties too often bow to their position. In
contrast to Senator Roberts’ clear recommendation, the official recommendations of the report, from the majority Labor
Party members, are too weak and do not match the seriousness of the evidence. The Liberal Party’s dissenting report is
even worse, given that Liberal Senator Paul Scarr heard all of the testimony, knows how badly ASIC let the victims down,
but put his name to a statement denying the victims any federal compensation.
The actual evidence from the inquiry, acknowledged in the report, leaves no doubt that two government agencies, the
federal regulator ASIC and the WA state Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) are responsible for
the financial ruin of the Sterling victims.
The report gives this damning assessment of ASIC:
“4.105 That said, the committee also has serious concerns about the performance of ASIC with respect to the Sterling
Group matter, including its under-assessment of the gravity of the risks, the timeliness of its response, and its
failure to act proactively. The committee is mindful of the requirements for ASIC to obtain proper evidence and follow
due process before undertaking investigations and enforcement actions. The committee is also conscious that ASIC’s
regulatory role does not involve preventing all consumer losses or ensuring compensation for consumers in all cases
where losses arise. However, in this instance the committee believes that ASIC had sufficient evidence and grounds for
concern in 2017 to refer the matter to its enforcement division for investigation.
“4.106 In fact, the issues identified in ASIC’s Statement of Concerns were serious and appeared to establish possible
contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act). Furthermore, these concerns should have been further strengthened when ASIC was provided with a
qualified audit report from the auditor of the SIT which raised a ‘material uncertainty’ over the trust’s ability to
continue as a going concern on 29 September 2017. Despite these matters, ASIC did not commence a formal investigation
until 29 May 2018.”
In attempting to deflect blame from the Commonwealth government, Senator Paul Scarr identified the WA government’s clear
shared culpability:
“1.11 To be clear, the tenants had signed a Payment Direction Deed which (on its face) provided protection for their
continuing right of occupancy in the event that the income from the Sterling Income Trust was insufficient to meet
rental payments (as became the case). However, sections of the Residential Tenancies Act 1987 (WA) operated to make the provision void and of no effect.
“1.12 Why was this fatal flaw in the protection of the tenants arising under the Residential Tenancies Act of WA not
identified by WA DMIRS? This was not in the purview of the Commonwealth—it fell four square within the jurisdiction of
the WA Government.”
The evidence is in—ASIC and DMIRS betrayed vulnerable elderly consumers. Now it’s time to put it right. While the ALP is
right to call to expand the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort to include managed investment schemes, that is not a
solution for Sterling victims. The Commonwealth and WA governments are liable, and the victims must be compensated
immediately.
Join the call for the Commonwealth government to make an immediate Act of Grace payment to save the Sterling victims,
and overhaul ASIC into a strong and effective regulator feared by financial predators.