By the Stop Golden Rice Network (SGRN)
The push for corporate-led solutions to hunger and malnutrition is alarming. In particular, Golden Rice is now being
proposed as a solution to the worsening hunger and malnutrition associated with the pandemic. Agrochemical
transnationals (TNCs) and collaborating institutions such as the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) are using
concerns over food security during the pandemic to push for an industrial agricultural system that is already
discredited. To quote PAN Asia Pacific:
“in the webinar “The future of food systems in Southeast Asia post-COVID19” organised by IRRI and the FAO, Jean Balie,
IRRI’s head of Agri-Food Policy, said that they are “looking to increase the mineral and vitamin content in rice grains”
as a response to the pandemic, alluding to renewed promotion of the genetically-modified Golden Rice, which has recently
been approved for commercialization in Bangladesh and the Philippines” said PANAP.
Golden Rice projects and applications are currently underway in three countries. On December 10, 2019, the Philippines’
Dept. of Agriculture’s Bureau of Plant Industry (DA-BPI) issued a Golden Rice permit for Direct Use for Food, Feed and
Processing. This was despite the standing challenge by farmers, scientists and civil society groups regarding Golden Rice’s unresolved safety and efficacy issues.Stop Golden Rice! Photo: Kervin Bonganciso/MASIPAG
In August 2019, it was confirmed that Indonesia rice research centre (BB Padi) had grown Golden Rice in their testing
fields in Sukamandi, West Java. But BB Padi is still awaiting permission from Indonesia’s biosafety clearing house for
confined field testing in selected areas.
In Bangladesh, rumours have circulated that Golden Rice would be approved by the Biosafety Core Committee under the
environment ministry last November 15, 2019. While there have been no specifics yet, proponents are optimistic that
approval in Bangladesh will occur.
We, the Stop Golden Rice Network (SGRN), believe that Golden Rice is an unnecessary and unwanted technology being
peddled by corporations purely for their profit-making agenda. Golden Rice will only strengthen the grip of corporations
over rice and agriculture and will endanger agrobiodiversity and peoples’ health as well. Therefore, farmers, consumers
and basic sectors have been campaigning against the propagation and commercialization of Golden Rice since the
mid-2000s, utilizing various forms and actions, including the historical uprooting of Golden Rice field trials back in
2013.Why is there intense opposition towards Golden Rice?
The importance of rice in Asian countries cannot be understated; 90% of rice is produced and consumed in Asia. Rice is
at the center of the social, cultural and economic activities of peoples across Asia. It is also a political commodity
as rice is the staple food for a majority of the Asian population. Asian countries such as the Philippines, Indonesia,
and India are centers of origin of more than 100,000 varieties of rice. Also considered as among the most biodiverse
countries in the world, a wide array of vegetables, fruits, root crops and cereals abound in the farms and forests of
these countries, ensuring a dependable source of nutrition for the families and the communities.
Yet, malnutrition is prevalent, particularly among children and women. This is not simply because of the absence of an
important nutrient or vitamin. It is caused by the “lack of access to sufficient, nutritious and safe food” due to
poverty, and changing food production and consumption patterns (p. 27, UN FAO, 2017).
This impact is seen in IRRI’s Green Revolution wherein many farmers across Asia have become bound to the expensive
inputs and seeds peddled by huge agrochemical TNCs who promote a single-crop diet. As a result of green revolution,
white rice has become dominant in once very diverse Asian diets; but white rice has a high glycemic index which causes
diabetes and 60% of global diabetes cases are in Asia. Packing more nutrients, like Vitamin A, in rice, which requires
more rice consumption would make this worse. Especially with the new pandemic for which diabetes is considered a risk
factor for severity of Covid-19.
The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (UN FAO) identifies the dominance of large corporations over food
systems as among the factors that contribute to food insecurity and malnutrition (p. 27, UN FAO, 2017). In developing
countries, large tracts of agricultural lands are being converted either to industrial and commercial land uses, or to
large-scale mono-cropped plantations of cash crops such as pineapples, palm oil and bananas that hardly serve the
nutrition needs of the people. FAO further acknowledges that the changes in food systems and diets, such as the
prevalence of highly-processed foods and displacement of traditional foods and eating habits also contributes to the
worsening trend of food insecurity and malnutrition.
Given this context, we assert that Golden Rice is simply a ‘band-aid’ solution to the wide, gaping wound of hunger and
poverty. Worse, the issues that continue to hound Golden Rice further prove the point that it is unnecessary and
unwantedNegligible beta carotene content – The current version of the Golden Rice, GR2E contains a negligible amount of beta-carotene (from 3.57 ug/g to 22
ug/g), which the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) also acknowledged, making the product useless in
addressing Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) in contrast to existing and readily available food sources. Already minimal,
Golden Rice’s beta-carotene was also found to degrade quickly after harvesting, storing and processing, such as milling
and even cooking unless the farmers vacuum-pack and refrigerate the GM rice. Farmers from developing countries however,
do not seal or store the paddy rice in vacuum packs, which will make the product more expensive. Electricity also
remains scarce in remote farming communities so refrigerating the harvest is unrealistic bordering on the absurd.No meaningful safety tests have been done – Even as the Golden Rice has been approved in the Philippines, there has been no testing done to ascertain if it is
safe for human consumption. Meanwhile, the aforementioned beta-carotene degradation may result in toxic compounds
causing oxidative stress damage which might lead to cancer. Dr. David Schubert of the Salk Institute for Biological
Studies, USA and Dr. Michael Antoniou of King’s College London, state that “there have never been short nor, more importantly, long-term safety testing in laboratory animals (of Golden Rice) and
this must be done for several generations in rats to determine if it causes birth defects, which we consider a serious
possibility.”Contamination of other rice varieties and wild relatives of rice – Field trials conducted so far have only looked at the agronomic traits of Golden Rice, and not its long-term effects
on the environment, including its possible effects on the genetic diversity of the thousands of rice varieties being
cared for by small scale farmers and indigenous peoples. While rice is a self-pollinating crop, cross-contamination is
still inevitable Contamination can also occur through seed mixing. Such contamination has already happened in the US
with the Liberty Link rice scandal back in 2006 that caused US farmers millions of dollars in losses because of the
inadvertent contamination of the yet unapproved GM rice.Safer sources of beta-carotene – Being some of the mega-diverse countries, vegetables and fruits that are high in beta-carotene are found in abundance
in the Philippines, Indonesia, Bangladesh, India and other target countries for Golden Rice. These foods are available
and accessible for the people, and contain much higher levels of beta-carotene than Golden Rice.
The worsening land-grabbing and land conversion cases, liberalization of agricultural commodities and increasing control
of corporations over agriculture and food, however, are preventing farmers and their communities from having access to
these safe and nutritious foods. In developing countries the challenges described above remain the main culprit of food
insecurity and malnutrition. Both the development of biofortified crops like Golden Rice for solving health issues and
corporate led projects in agriculture as ways to ensure food security represent a worrisome push for top-down and
anti-diversity approaches to food and health that will ultimately undermine people’s capacities to strengthen their
local food systems. By emphasizing dependence on just a few market-based crops biofortification actually promotes a poor
diet with little nutritional diversity
Golden Rice is a failed and useless product, and that is why we continue to resist and oppose it. Time and again, huge
agrochemical companies, philanthrocapitalists and pseudo-public agencies have done everything in their power to deny the
people’s right to participate in decisions about their food and agriculture. Already, zinc and iron GM rice and thirty
other GM rice are in the pipeline, with Golden Rice serving as the Trojan Horse to lure the people into social
acceptance and false security.A demonstration against Golden Rice, Manila Photo: Ryan Damaso/MASIPAG
More than resisting the release of Golden Rice however, we are pushing for safer, better and healthier alternatives to
addressing VAD and other malnutrition issues. VAD and other malnutrition problems can be mitigated and addressed by
having a diverse diet. Nutrition does not need to be an expensive commodity, nor rely on advanced technology.
We believe that instead of pushing Golden Rice and biofortifying crops through genetic modification, governments should
promote biodiversity in farms and on tables by supporting safe, healthy and sustainable food production. We are also
calling on governments to pay attention to the needs of our food producers, including facilitating access to lands to
till, appropriate technologies and an agriculture policy that will promote and uphold the people’s right to food and the
nations’ food sovereignty.