At a virtual meeting of all WTO members on 14 May, WTO Director-General Roberto Azevêdo announced that he would step
down on 31 August, cutting his second term short by exactly one year.
He said that bringing forward his departure would allow members to select his successor in the coming months, without
diverting political energy and attention from preparations for the Twelfth Ministerial Conference, which is set to be
held in 2021.
“We must give my successor sufficient time to plan, together with you, the path not only for MC12, but for how that
Conference fits into your plans for the future of the Organization,” he told members. “The earlier the new DG takes
office the better.”His full statement is below:
Good afternoon, everybody.
Thank you for joining this meeting on short notice, ahead of tomorrow’s special virtual General Council.
This session is about one very specific administrative arrangement. I have an announcement to make. This August, I will
complete 7 years as WTO Director General. And I have decided that I will step down from my current position on 31 August
2020, cutting short my second term in office by exactly one year.
Many of you will have seen the news reports about my decision. It was not my intention for you to hear it from the press
before you heard it from me – but unfortunately it has worked out that way.
This is a decision that I do not take lightly. Between the lockdown and my recent knee surgery, I have had more time
than usual for reflection. And I reached this decision only after long discussions with my family – my wife here in
Geneva, and my daughters and my mother in Brasilia. It is a personal decision - a family decision – and I am convinced
that this decision serves the best interests of this Organization.
I also want to be clear about what this is not: it is not health-related (thank goodness). Nor am I pursuing any
political opportunities. I hope the future holds new challenges in store, but as of right now, I do not know what they
will be.
Regardless of how fulfilling these last 7 years have been for me, I must now end this cycle. As members start to shape
the WTO's agenda for the new post-COVID realities, they should do so with a new Director-General.
It is not easy for me to say this. The multilateral trading system has been at the centre of my career since I was first
posted here in 1997. Since then, I have been working in the system, with the system, and for the system. A big chunk of
my life, 23 years, has been dedicated to the system, and I have been grateful for this opportunity. My tenure as WTO
Director-General has been the most demanding, exciting and gratifying period in my professional life. I have learned a
great deal. And I believe that I have been able to contribute to maintaining the WTO as a key pillar of global economic
governance amid challenging times for multilateral cooperation.
Together, we learned to be creative, innovative and pragmatic. We delivered the Trade Facilitation Agreement, the
expansion of the Information Technology Agreement, and decisions on food security. We eliminated agricultural export
subsidies, and enabled more goods and services exports from least developed countries. Groups of like-minded members
have found ways to advance discussions on critical issues while protecting the right of other members to opt in or out.
And behind all this work, I want to pay special tribute to the staff of the WTO Secretariat. Working with such a
professional and dedicated group of people has been one of the real highlights of my time here.
Yet while we have achieved a great deal, much more remains to be done. We have set ourselves ambitious and
transformative goals for MC12 and for WTO reform. And now we must ensure that trade contributes to the global economic
recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
But I will not be the leader with whom you will chart and walk the strategic path ahead.
The challenges facing the work of this Organization will always be formidable - commensurate with its relevance and role
as an anchor of predictability and certainty in a fast-changing global economy.
In addition to ongoing work and negotiations, we must also consider what we need to advance the wider discussions around
WTO reform. This ongoing process of pragmatic change is something we have discussed often over the years.
We know that the WTO cannot stand frozen while the world around it changes profoundly. Ensuring that the WTO continues
to be able to respond to members’ needs and priorities is an imperative, not an option. The “new normal” that emerges
from the COVID-19 pandemic will have to be reflected in our work here.
True and meaningful reform is a long-term task. We have had some success in starting to do things differently, but it
will take time and commitment from members to keep building paths forward. While I am convinced we have set out in the
right direction, the road ahead will entail consequential choices and deep reflection.
MC12 will be a critical landmark for this exercise.
As I see it, MC12 should be a stepping-stone to the future of the WTO. It should tie together our various ongoing
efforts in a coherent approach, and lay the foundations for subsequent reform. This means that MC12 will require careful
preparation and execution from you, the members.
My departure in August will give you the time you need to work with my successor – whoever she or he may be – to shape
the strategic direction for MC12 and the months and years that follow.
As things stand today, our next Ministerial Conference will take place either in the middle of 2021 or at the end of
that year. We have an offer from Kazakhstan to host a June meeting, and there is a real possibility that this scenario
will prevail.
In our normal calendar, the selection process for the next WTO DG would start this December, with the nomination of
candidates. The selection process would then dominate the first trimester of 2021 – and maybe longer. I don’t have to
remind you how intense that process is.
This timing would clearly impair preparatory work for MC12, irrespective of whether it is held in the northern summer or
at the end of the year.
In either case, the selection process would be a distraction from – or worse, a disruption to – our desired outcomes.
Instead of focusing all efforts on the search for compromise – on finding flexibility and making concessions – we would
be spending valuable time on a politically charged process that has proved divisive in the past.
For a mid-year ministerial, the selection process would overlap with the most intensive phase of pre-ministerial
preparations, making it highly prone to compromise the planning and execution of MC12.
Even if MC12 is held at the end of 2021, staying on through the end of my term would leave my successor mere weeks to
prepare. I faced this situation when I first took office and I can tell you, first hand, that this is far from ideal. It
might work if we are having a tightly focused ministerial centred on a small number of issues, such as trade
facilitation and public stockholding in 2013. But given the far-reaching implications of the choices you will make at
MC12, and the wide range of issues likely to be before you there, I believe you and your stakeholders deserve more
ambition.
We must decouple these two processes: the DG succession process and the preparation of MC12. Doing both would inevitably
compromise MC12 and the reform impetus. I care too much for this Organization to allow this to happen.
These considerations on timing were on my mind as I considered my decision to step down. And my conclusion is that the
sooner I allow you to proceed with the selection process, the better off we will be.
As we have seen, I think we must give my successor sufficient time to plan, together with you, the path not only for
MC12, but for how that Conference fits into your plans for the future of the Organization. This is not a minor task by
any standard. This requires careful deliberation – and sufficient time to advance such discussions. The earlier the new
DG takes office the better.
Second, the pandemic has significantly slowed down many of our activities. Physical meetings remain suspended. Many of
you have also advised against trying to advance negotiations for the time being. Even if conditions in Geneva improve,
it is quite likely that many capitals and governments would be under duress in the months to come.
This offers us a window to launch the selection process with less impact than usual on our work. Members should seize
this moment to start deliberating on how to effect the change in leadership at the WTO.
Again, my decision was reached after long and hard reflection, and much discussion with my family.
For the reasons I have outlined, I believe that it would be best if members promptly move ahead with the process for
selecting the next Director-General.
The procedures for the DG selection process adopted by members in 2002 state that in the event of a vacancy, "the Chair
of the General Council shall initiate, as soon as possible, a process for appointment of a new Director-General." I am
and will continue to be in close contact with the Chairman of the General Council and with all of you to facilitate this
process however you deem necessary.
I urge you not to treat the process of selecting the next DG as business as usual. This Organization must start 2021
with a focus on the real challenges: ensuring that the multilateral trading system responds to new economic realities,
above all the post-COVID recovery. It cannot afford to be distracted by a protracted search for a new DG.
I will be with you, working to improve and strengthen this Organization until my last day in office - and beyond, for
wherever I am, like my predecessors, I will always be advocating for this system, for the WTO.
The WTO may not be perfect, but it is indispensable all the same. It is what keeps us from a world where the law of the
jungle prevails, at least as far as trade is concerned.
I am proud of our work and it has been a true privilege working with each and every one of you: both those who are here
today and your predecessors as well.
It is not my intention to have a proper discussion today. I just wanted to share this information with you. And let me
be clear that tomorrow’s General Council is also not at all about this. We will be having a very important discussion
about the COVID-related issues identified by the Chair, and you should use every second of your allotted five minutes
for this purpose.
As I have said, I will still be with you for the next few months. It is time to roll up our sleeves and set out to find
a leader worthy of you, our stakeholders and the multilateral trading system.
I will now open the floor in case anyone wishes to say something. As I have said, I don’t expect a proper discussion
today – we’ll have plenty of time for this. The General Council Chair will be reaching out to you very soon to consult
on the way forward. So if you do ask for the floor, please be very brief.
Thank you.