INDEPENDENT NEWS

Peace plan strips Palestinians of their rights

Published: Fri 31 Jan 2020 08:52 AM
GENEVA - The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor followed the US President Donald Trump's announcement of a plan to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict entitled "Peace for Prosperity" which was celebrated by Israel and rejected by the Palestinians.
The Geneva-based Euro-Med Monitor highlighted in a press statement on Wednesday the American plan, which reveals striping Palestinians of their rights in violation of international law, which may cause more suffering and violations in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The Chairman of the Euro-Med Monitor, Ramy Abdu, considered that the main points of the plan suggest that it is one-sided in favor of Israel, in particular granting it the full sovereignty over Jerusalem and giving it the green light to annex large areas of the West Bank and imposing its sovereignty on the major settlement blocs in violation of international resolutions that consider settlements illegal and call for their removal, including United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 in December 2016.
Abdu stressed that the failure to address the issue of more than five million Palestinian refugees in a responsible and fair manner reveals how this American proposal is faulty, which makes the chances of achieving peace under this plan unlikely.
Abdu emphasized that any plan that is not based on international law and guarantees the Palestinians’ right to self-determination, based on ending the Israeli military occupation, the right of Palestinian refugees to return, and the dismantling of Israeli settlements, is doomed to fail.
Abdu pointed out that the American plan constitutes a violation of the United Nations resolutions regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict, in which the proposed Palestinian state has been transformed into an isolated cantons, giving the Palestinians a state without borders or crossings, as everything in this state remains subject to Israeli sovereignty and control, thus violating the principles of the International humanitarian law.
The Euro-Med Monitor called on the international community, especially the European Union, to reject the American plan, especially with regard to giving Israel the green light to annex more Palestinian land, which constitutes a violation of international law and a dangerous indication of more violence in the region.
In this regard, the organization pointed out the need to adhere to the position of the European Union Council issued in 2009, and to ensure the adoption of a set of conclusions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict regarding reaching a two-state solution, including the EU’s announcement of not recognizing any changes to the pre-1967 borders such as in Jerusalem other than what agreed upon by the two parties.
The EU has never recognized the annexation of East Jerusalem and assured previously that the state of Palestine’s capital should be in Jerusalem.
The Euro-Med Monitor urged taking practical and immediate measures conducive to restore respect to international law, enforce relevant United Nations resolutions concerning the two-state solution and ending the Israeli occupation.
In this regard, the Euro-Med Monitor warned against using the American plan to provide a cover to protect Israel and deny the Palestinians justice, given the announcement by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court last December that the preliminary investigation conducted in Palestine concluded that war crimes had been committed in the Occupied Palestinian territories, and that a comprehensive investigation should be conducted as soon as the territorial jurisdiction of the court is confirmed.

Next in World

Julian Assange extradition case finally heading to court
By: The Conversation
Trump Visits Modi's India and Announces $3 Billion Arms Deal
By: Common Dreams
On Bernie Sanders’ Presidential Bid
By: Gordon Campbell
Crisis and Opportunity: The ‘Deal of the Century’ Challenge
By: Ramzy Baroud
On the Iran aftermath
By: Gordon Campbell
We’re Asking One Question In Assange’s Case: Should Journalists Be Punished For Exposing War Crimes?
By: Caitlin Johnstone
Assange’s Persecution Has Exposed Media Depravity The World Over
By: Caitlin Johnstone
Your Man In The Public Gallery – Assange Hearing Day 2
By: Craig Murray
Your Man In The Public Gallery – Assange Hearing Day 1 162
By: Craig Murray
Seeing Through The Lies – US Edition
By: Craig Murray
Julian Assange Against The Imperium: Day Two Of Extradition Hearings
By: Binoy Kampmark
Pardoning Julian Assange: Donald Trump, WikiLeaks And The DNC
By: Binoy Kampmark
“Leave Our Bloke Alone”: A Little Mission For Julian Assange
By: Binoy Kampmark
‘And Then - Nothing. Silence’: The Deadly Facade Of ‘Democracy’
By: MediaLens
Global Protests - Speak Up For Julian Assange
By: Free Assange NZ
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media