UN expert welcomes ruling on labelling of Israeli settlements products by European Court of Justice
GENEVA (15 November 2019) – A UN expert has applauded the 12 November 2019 ruling by the European Court of Justice which
held that food products produced by Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory must indicate that they
originate from a settlement, and not as a “product of Israel”.
“This judgement is principled, and an important first step to building a legal culture of accountability when it comes
to Israel’s settlements,” said Michael Lynk, the Special Rapporteur for the situation of human rights in the Palestinian
territory occupied since 1967.
“These settlements are illegal under international law. They are a purported war crime under the Statute of Rome. So, at
the very least, European consumers must have accurate information before them when they make purchasing choices.”
The ruling by the Court accepted that consumers’ choices can be influenced by a range of factors, including health,
environmental, social and ethical considerations. It observed that food law in Europe prohibits any practices which may
mislead the consumer.
“Importantly, the Court pointed out that the European Union has committed itself to the strict observance of
international law,” said the Special Rapporteur. “According to international law, the Israeli settlements violate the
Fourth Geneva Convention’s prohibition against civilian settlements in occupied territory, and they obstruct the right
of the Palestinian people to enjoy self-determination.”
The ruling by the European Court of Justice follows a similar judgement in Kattenburg v. Canada by the Federal Court of
Canada in June 2019. The Government of Canada is appealing the decision to the Federal Court of Canada.
The Special Rapporteur noted that a study released earlier this week by the European Middle East Project concluded that
the European Union has largely failed to enforce its 2015 decision to require the accurate labelling of products from
the Israeli settlements.
The study – which examined wines produced in Israeli settlements in the Syrian Golan Heights and the West Bank – found
that only 10 percent of these wines on sale in the EU had correct or partially correct origin labelling in line with EU
rules: “Product of West Bank/Golan Heights (Israeli settlement).”
“This is a disappointing finding regarding the enforcement efforts of the European Union,” said Lynk. “If the Green Line
(Israel’s pre-1967 border) is supposed to be a red line, why does the European Union not take its own rules seriously?”
The Special Rapporteur stated that the international community, including the European Union, must now turn its
attention to prohibiting all Israeli settlement goods and services from entering domestic markets.
“The United Nations Security Council, almost 40 years ago – in resolution 465 – called upon all UN members: ‘not to
provide Israel with any assistance to be used specifically in connection with the settlements in the occupied
territories.’ Anything short of ending trade with, and investment in, the Israeli settlements provides them with the
economic oxygen to continue to grow,” he said. “The international community cannot call these settlements illegal and an
obstacle to peace, and yet provide them with the economic means to thrive.”