Public health faces a critical climate deadline
Less than two months ago, the Climate change is the
defining issue of our time and now is the last window of
opportunity to do something about it. Current national
commitments to reduce carbon emissions will lead to at least
3°C of warming; and even these commitments are not yet
being fully met. Meanwhile many national leaders have been
distracted by a range of issues from trade wars to internal
politics. Around the world, the impacts of climate
change are no longer distant or deniable. A European heat
wave this summer drove temperatures in France to an
Climate action and public
health are intertwined The causes of climate change -- fossil
fuel-based energy and transportation, and industrialized
food systems, as well as land use that burns or plows or
paves over the earth’s recovery systems -- have health
impacts themselves, including the extensive health harms of
air pollution on respiratory, cardiovascular, and infant and
child development. Mitigating climate change offers
tremendous opportunities to improve health, through reduced
air pollution, improved diets, and more equitable
communities that support healthier, more active lives. Late in 2018, health organizations from around the world
representing over 5 million doctors, nurses and public
health professionals, issued a
Global emissions are reaching record levels and
the last four years were the four hottest on record, with
winter temperatures in the Arctic rising by 3°C since 1990.
Sea levels are rising, coral reefs are dying, forests are
burned and we are increasingly seeing the life-threatening
impact of climate change on health, through air pollution,
storm surges, heatwaves, risks to food security, and
more.
Deaths, injuries and displacement,
malnutrition, and the spread of water- food- and
vector-borne diseases follow these climate impacts. Indeed,
the health fallout can last months or even years after an
extreme weather event or sustained, climate-driven
changes.
1. Meet and strengthen the commitments
under the Paris Agreement
2. Transition away from the use
of coal, oil and natural gas to clean, safe, and renewable
energy.
3. Transition to zero-carbon transportation
systems with an emphasis on active
transportation.
4. Build local, healthy, and sustainable
food and agricultural systems.
5. Invest in policies that
support a just transition for workers and communities
adversely impacted by the move to a low-carbon
economy
6. Ensure that gender equality is central to
climate action.
7. Raise the health sector voice in the
call for climate action.
8. Incorporate climate solutions
into all health care and public health systems.
9. Build
resilient communities in the face of climate
change.
10. Invest in climate and health.
UNSG paves the way to COP25
We need an urgent, wholesale transformation across multiple systems -- energy production, our food systems, transportation, urban planning and economic systems. We must transition rapidly away from fossil fuels to clean energy. We need to transform our food systems so that they build and protect soil health and ecosystems, reduce food waste and food processing, and ensure everyone has access to a healthful diet. We need to move away from combustion engine vehicles to active transportation, public transportation, and where needed, electric vehicles.
Our cities can be designed to be solutions to the challenges of mitigating and adapting to climate change, while providing healthier places for people to live. And we need financial mechanisms and economic systems that reward, rather than undermine to the benefit of a few, these needed approaches.
Such changes, if pursued ambitiously and urgently, offer the opportunity to keep climate change within the 1.5 limit the nations of the world agreed to in Paris, and to usher in far greater global health, equity, and resilience -- in short, a healthier world.
The UNSG Summit aims “to showcase a leap in collective national political ambition and demonstrate massive movements in the real economy in support of the agenda.” Governments have been challenged to come to New York with concrete commitments. The Summit is a crucial step to achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. It will set the tone for the discussions that will be had at COP25 in Santiago, Chile in December.
COP25, in turn, lays the groundwork for COP26 in 2020, when countries are to deliver their new Nationally Determined Contributions [their emissions reductions commitments, NDCs], as required under the Paris Agreement. The Summit, therefore, will reveal clearly which countries are stepping up with the kind of climate leadership this challenge requires, and which prefer denial and delay over action at this critical juncture in the history of the world.
Political leaders who take action will be remembered as the moral authorities of their time.
Today’s leaders are the last
politicians who still have the time and possibility to act.
With clear evidence of the risks posed by climate change,
they have a responsibility to take action and will be held
accountable.
• Countries need to be prepared to bring
more ambitious commitments under the Paris Agreement when
they meet in 2020. This is the only way to ensure the
“right to health” for people of all countries. The
Climate Action Summit is a key stepping stone on a path that
runs through COP25 in Santiago, and COP26 in Glasgow next
year. Wealthier, more developed countries, which have
benefited from years of fossil fuel use and thus contributed
significantly to the climate change problem and which have
greater resources with which to respond, must show greater
ambition in their emissions reductions, and provide
assistance to developing nations.
• US President Trump
remains globally isolated as the leader who abandoned the
Paris Agreement, putting him in opposition to how the
majority of people in the US think about climate action,
while emboldening a handful of other countries also to drag
their heels on climate. The US administration’s rollback
of an array of environmental and climate regulations puts
the health of US residents, and rest of the world, at risk.
As the country responsible for the most cumulative CO2
emissions and one that is financially prosperous, the US
bears a special moral obligation to set and meet ambitious
climate targets. While the US is unlikely to change its
position at the Summit, internal pressure on US decision
makers continues to grow, and climate change is on the table
for the upcoming US presidential election in
2020.
• Despite internal distractions as it grapples
with Brexit, Europe must sort out internal
differences and step up with ambitious emissions reductions
targets for 2030 and 2050. The region has the capacity to do
more, and it must.
• Brazil's President Bolsonaro is
due to open the UNSG meeting on 24 September, and must be
held accountable for undermining the protection of the
Amazon rainforest, and undermining, thereby, global efforts
to achieve the 1.5 target.
• China has vowed to
become a leader in global climate politics, and it has been
overachieving its initial Paris Agreement commitments;
however those commitments were only enough to limit warming
to 2°C, not 1.5°C. This is a significant problem for the
world’s climate goals, as China is the greatest current
emitter of CO2. Both inside and outside the country, China
is still investing in building new coal power plants. China
must re-energize its commitment to being a climate leader,
starting with a deadline for phasing out coal. Setting
itself on a 1.5°C compatible path would pay for itself in
health cost savings for the country due to reduced air
pollution.
• In India, the world’s third largest
emitter behind the China and the US, Prime Minister Narendra
Modi’s government has sent mixed signals -- for example,
by projecting the country as a global leader in renewables
while also delaying health-protecting emissions regulations
for power plants. With primary energy demand expected to
triple between 2015 and 2040 while grappling with a
widespread air pollution crisis and glaring vulnerability to
climate impacts, India faces high expectations to enhance
its NDCs and demonstrate proactive and ambitious climate
action.
• Meanwhile numerous countries are showing real
leadership, including some of the nations least responsible
for climate change, and enduring the greatest impacts. Fiji, at serious risk from sea level rise
and cyclones as are other Small Island Developing States
has committed to net zero emissions by 2050. The Gambia, though a developing country,
has set ambitious emission reductions goals compatible with
1.5°C and as such, is a global leader.
Turning commitments into action
The Paris Agreement is a visionary, viable, forward-looking policy framework that sets out exactly what needs to be done to stop climate disruption and reverse its impact. But the agreement itself is meaningless without ambitious action.
Countries must enhance their nationally determined contributions by 2020, in line with reducing global greenhouse gas emissions by 45 per cent over the next decade, and to net zero emissions by 2050. These targets are essential to protecting the “right to health”, a core commitment of the Paris Agreement.
At UN
Climate Summit we expect governments to:
o Signal that, in 2020, they will commit to ambitious
national emissions reduction that, collectively, put us on
track to limit warming to 1.5 degrees, in alignment with the
global scientific findings of the IPCC1.5
report.
o Announce new commitments in specific action
areas under the 9 tracks of the UN Climate Action Summit
that demonstrate concrete plans to achieve such emissions
reduction.
o Demonstrate leadership in setting an agenda
for COP25, and throughout 2020, that includes the bilateral,
multilateral, and global discussions designed to enable
1.5-level ambition in 2020 NDC commitments.
o Include
ministries of health and health civil society in their
national climate decision making to ensure climate ambition
and climate strategies are designed to maximally protect
health and improve global equity.
o Commit appropriate
levels of funding to finance climate and health research,
resilience, adaptation and mitigation, and to enable health
sector involvement in climate decision-making and
implementation.
o Establish a norm of including health in
their NDCs, highlighting the health co-benefits of
mitigation strategies, and ensuring protection of health in
mitigation, adaptation, and resilience.
o Recognize the
higher capacity, and higher responsibility of wealthier
countries (with more historical responsibility for total
emissions to date) to set targets that are far more
ambitious -- e.g. net zero emissions by 2030 or
2040.