Human rights in North Korea top priority despite rising tensions, Special Rapporteur and UN experts
GENEVA (10 March 2017) – A call to firmly assign responsibility for gross human rights violations in the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) will be made by the UN Special Rapporteur, Tomás Ojea Quintana, when he presents the
first report to the Human Rights Council since his appointment in June 2016.
The report* will be discussed amid increasing political tensions between the DPRK and its neighbours after the
authorities in Pyongyang resumed nuclear tests and missile launches using ballistic technology. The UN Security Council
has already strengthened sanctions against the DPRK as a result.
The report of the Special Rapporteur highlights the need to hold perpetrators of gross human rights violations
accountable, and practical options towards accountability are further explored in the report by the group of independent
experts, Sonja Biserko and Sara Hossain, who were mandated by the Human Rights Council to support the Special Rapporteur
on issues of accountability.
Mr. Ojea Quintana argues that recent political developments and the push for militarization have further isolated the
country from the international community and reduced opportunities to discuss human rights. He says: “It is clear that
the deteriorating security and political situation, and the prospect of instability, do not make room for an easy
conversation about human rights.”
There have been a few attempts to set up a dialogue between the DPRK and UN human rights mechanisms, including through
the submission of long-overdue national reports to the Committee on the Rights of the Child and the Committee on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
“These are important channels for the DPRK to discuss ways to implement their international human rights obligations,
and I urge the authorities to make the most of them,” the expert said.
The report provides an overview of developments in several key issues, including deficiencies in the public food
distribution system, restrictions on access to information, and violations of international labour standards concerning
overseas workers. The report also expresses continuing concern over the grave situation in political prison camps and
the unresolved cases of enforced disappearances involving the DPRK, including the abduction of citizens of Japan and the
Republic of Korea.
Mr. Ojea Quintana says the information he received came from several sources including people he met who had recently
left the DPRK. He said he was “impressed that they were well aware of their rights and despite all the obstacles they
faced, looked forward to the future.”
“The testimonies I have received confirm what the international community has been saying for years regarding the
critical nature of the human rights situation in the DPRK, and the need to take immediate steps to protect people. The
current tensions should not distract us from pursuing that goal,” Mr Ojea Quintana added.
The Special Rapporteur is calling on all parties to implement without delay the recommendations in the report of the
group of independent experts on accountability, which is annexed to his report.
The group of independent experts said: “We call for a framework for accountability that is human rights-based – ensuring
that the rights and needs of victims of human rights violations are at the centre of any accountability measures.” They
added: “this goal can be achieved only through a fully participatory process involving victims and affected communities,
to ensure that accountability measures reflect their experiences, views, and their expectations of justice.”
The group of independent experts emphasized that given the severity and complexity of the human rights situation in the
DPRK, “a comprehensive and multi-pronged approach is required, in line with international norms and standards.”
This approach should encompass measures to establish individual criminal responsibility of perpetrators, as well as
measures to ensure the rights of victims and societies to know the truth about violations, the rights of victims to
reparations, and guarantees of non-recurrence. In this context, “accountability requires coordinated efforts on all
these fronts and in multiple forums,” the group added.
In their report, the independent experts mapped options for accountability within the domestic system of the DPRK and
other countries; through international and internationally assisted courts; as well as through the international human
rights machinery. The group of independent experts reiterated that “the DPRK is the primary duty holder of the
obligation to bring perpetrators of violations in the country to account,” while the group concluded that it appeared
that no viable options for accountability were in existence or had been used in the DPRK.
Given these findings, the group of independent experts called on the international community to “continue to pursue a
referral of the situation in the DPRK to the International Criminal Court. The scope for the establishment of an ad hoc
international tribunal must also be duly considered - including as a deterrent for future crimes and a signal that
victims will be heard,” the group added.
Finally, the report of the group of independent experts identified practical steps that should be taken immediately to
contribute to a comprehensive approach towards accountability.
The group of independent experts stressed that: “concrete steps towards making accountability a reality are needed now”.
The group said practical steps should include conducting awareness-raising of victims and affected communities, as well
as coordinated and comprehensive consultations with victims and other stakeholders. Additionally, the group called for
sustained and sound information and evidence gathering and storage, and for an assessment of available information and
evidence to be undertaken in order to identify gaps and develop possible investigation and prosecution strategies and
blueprints for suitable international court models.