Oxfam News Release
Monday 16 January 2017
Just eight men own same wealth as half the world
Eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity, according to a new
report published by Oxfam today to mark the annual meeting of political and business leaders in Davos.
Oxfam’s report, ‘An economy for the 99 percent’, shows that the gap between rich and poor is far greater than had been
feared. It details how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis by avoiding taxes, driving
down wages and using their power to influence politics. It calls for a fundamental change in the way we manage our
economies so that they work for all people, and not just a fortunate few.
Earlier today, Oxfam revealed that two New Zealand men own more wealth than the poorest 30 per cent of the adult
population. The anti-poverty charity also reveal that the richest one per cent have 20 per cent of the wealth in New
Zealand, while 90 per cent of the population owns less than half of the nation’s wealth.
New and better data on the distribution of global wealth – particularly in India and China – indicates that the poorest
half of the world has less wealth than had been previously thought. Had this new data been available last year, it
would have shown that nine billionaires owned the same wealth as the poorest half of the planet, and not 62, as Oxfam
calculated at the time.
Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said:
“It is obscene for so much wealth to be held in the hands of so few when 1 in 10 people survive on less than $2 a day.
Inequality is trapping hundreds of millions in poverty; it is fracturing our societies and undermining democracy.
“Across the world, people are being left behind. Their wages are stagnating yet corporate bosses take home million
dollar bonuses; their health and education services are cut while corporations and the super-rich dodge their taxes;
their voices are ignored as governments sing to the tune of big business and a wealthy elite.”
Rachael Le Mesurier, executive director of Oxfam New Zealand, said: “We were shocked to discover the level of wealth
inequality in our country.
“The gap between the extremely wealthy and the rest of us is greater than we thought, both in New Zealand and around the
world. It is trapping huge numbers of people in poverty and fracturing our societies, as seen in New Zealand in the
changing profile of home ownership.
“It is an issue of massive national and global importance which must surely shape the promises of our politicians in
this election year.
“New Zealanders love fairness, not inequality. The Government should be tackling inequality here and globally, by
cracking down on tax avoidance wherever it is, and using that money to make our country, and the global economy, a
fairer place. This wouldn’t just be the right thing to do, a more fair economy would also be simple common sense and
enormously popular with New Zealanders.”
The two richest New Zealanders are Graeme Hart and Richard Chandler. They own wealth of US$6.4billion and US$2.7billion
respectively. Last year Singapore-based Chandler was named as using Mossack Fonseca, the law firm at the centre of the
Panama Papers tax avoidance controversy.
The number of the wealthiest New Zealanders leaped by almost 20 per cent between October 2015 and June 2016, from 212
people worth more than NZ$50million to 252, according to the Inland Revenue’s high-wealth individuals unit. Over a third
of the 252 extremely wealthy declared income of less than NZ$70,000 in 2015. NZ$70,000 is the point where the top tax
rate kicks in. The 252 are linked to over 7,500 entities. A number of these entities were reported last year to be in
dispute with the IRD over nearly $111million in tax.
Oxfam’s report shows how our broken economies are funnelling wealth to a rich elite at the expense of the poorest in
society, the majority of whom are women. The richest are accumulating wealth at such an astonishing rate that the world
could see its first trillionaire in just 25 years. To put this figure in perspective – you would need to spend $1
million every day for 2738 years to spend $1 trillion.
Public anger with inequality is already creating political shockwaves across the globe. Inequality has been cited as a
significant factor in the election of Donald Trump in the US, the election of President Duterte in the Philippines, and
Brexit in the UK.
Seven out of 10 people live in a country that has seen a rise in inequality in the last 30 years. Between 1988 and 2011
the incomes of the poorest 10 percent increased by just $65, while the incomes of the richest 1 percent grew by $11,800
– 182 times as much.
Women, who are often employed in low pay sectors, face high levels of discrimination in the work place, and who take on
a disproportionate amount of unpaid care work often find themselves at the bottom of the pile. On current trends it
will take 170 years for women to be paid the same as men.
‘An Economy for the 99 percent’ also reveals how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis. It
shows how, in order to maximize returns to their wealthy shareholders, big corporations are avoiding taxes, driving down
wages for their workers and the prices paid to producers, and investing less in their business.
Oxfam interviewed women working in a garment factory in Vietnam who work 12 hours a day, 6 days a week and still
struggle to get by on the $1 an hour they earn producing clothes for some of the world’s biggest fashion brands. The
CEOs of these companies are some of the highest paid people in the world. Corporate tax avoiding costs poor countries
at least $100 billion every year. This is enough money to provide an education for the 124 million children who aren’t
in school and fund healthcare interventions that could prevent the deaths of at least six million children every year.
The report outlines how the super-rich use a network of tax havens to avoid paying their fair share of tax and an army
of wealth managers to secure returns on their investments that would not be available to ordinary savers. Contrary to
popular belief, many of the super-rich are not ‘self-made’. Oxfam analysis shows over half the world’s billionaires
either inherited their wealth or accumulated it through industries which are prone to corruption and cronyism.
It also demonstrates how big business and the super-rich use their money and connections to ensure government policy
works for them. For example, billionaires in Brazil have sought to influence elections and successfully lobbied for a
reduction in tax bills while oil corporations in Nigeria have managed to secure generous tax breaks.
Byanyima said: “The millions of people who have been left behind by our broken economies need solutions, not scapegoats.
That is why Oxfam is setting out a new common sense approach to managing our economies so that they work for the
majority and not just the fortunate few.”
“Governments are not helpless in the face of technological change and market forces. If politicians stop obsessing with
GDP, and focus on delivering for all their citizens and not just a wealthy few, a better future is possible for
Oxfam’s blueprint for a more human economy includes:
Governments end the extreme concentration of wealth to end poverty. Governments should increase taxes on both wealth and
high incomes to ensure a more level playing field, and to generate funds needed to invest in healthcare, education and
Governments cooperate rather than just compete. Governments should work together to ensure workers are paid a decent
wage, and to put a stop to tax avoiding and the race to the bottom on corporate tax.
Governments support companies that benefit their workers and society rather than just their shareholders. The
multi-billion Euro company Mondragon, is owned by its 74,000 strong workforce. All employees receive a decent wage
because its pay structure ensures that the highest paid member of staff earns no more than 9 times the amount of the
Governments ensure economies work for women. They must help to dismantle the barriers to women’s economic progress such
as access to education and the unfair burden of unpaid care work.
Oxfam is also calling on business leaders to play their part in building a human economy. The World Economic Forum has
responsive and responsible leadership as its key theme this year. They can make a start by committing to pay their fair
share of tax and by ensuring their businesses pay a living wage. People around the global can also join the campaign at www.evenitup.org
Notes to editors
Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of Oxfam International will be attending the World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland from the 17 – 20 January 2017 to highlight the urgent need for action to tackle inequality. For more
information on WEF see www.weforum.org
The following materials are available for download here: https://oxfam.box.com/v/an-
* Full report and executive summary of ‘An Economy for the 99 percent’
* A document outlining the methodology behind the statistics in the report
* VNR footage and shot list featuring the stories of people in Kenya, Vietnam and Brazil who face a daily struggle with
The world’s 8 richest people are, in order of net worth:
Bill Gates: America founder of Microsoft (net worth $75 billion)
Amancio Ortega: Spanish founder of Inditex which owns the Zara fashion chain (net worth $67 billion)
Warren Buffett: American CEO and largest shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway (net worth $60.8 billion)
Carlos Slim Helu: Mexican owner of Grupo Carso (net worth: $50 billion)
Jeff Bezos: American founder, chairman and chief executive of Amazon (net worth: $45.2 billion)
Mark Zuckerberg: American chairman, chief executive officer, and co-founder of Facebook (net worth $44.6 billion)
Larry Ellison: American co-founder and CEO of Oracle (net worth $43.6 billion)
Michael Bloomberg: American founder, owner and CEO of Bloomberg LP (net worth: $40 billion)
Oxfam’s calculations are based on global wealth distribution data provided by the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Data book
The wealth of the world’s richest people was calculated using Forbes' billionaires list last published in March 2016. http://www.forbes.com/sites/