Briefing Notes: CAR investigations
In response to a question about the investigation of sexual abuse of children in the Central African Republic, the OHCHR
spokesperson had the following reply:
As you will understand, there are two investigations under way, and because of that we are very constrained in what we
can say at this point.
The first, and obviously by far the most important, investigation is into extremely serious allegations of sexual abuse
of children by French soldiers in the Central African Republic. This is being investigated by the French authorities. I
understand they have now said publicly that that investigation started on 31 Julylast year.
The allegations about what happened to these children are abhorrent. The details, contained in interviews with alleged
victims and witnesses by UN investigators last summer, including one of our staff, are utterly odious. We are extremely
glad that the French authorities are investigating this and that they have said they plan to call for the harshest
punishments available under the law for anyone found guilty. This is incredibly important, not just as a matter of
accountability, but also as deterrence. There have been far too many incidents of peacekeeping troops engaged in such
acts, whether within UN peacekeeping forces, or – as in this case – forces that are operating independently. We have
been cooperating with the French authorities and will continue to do so to the best of our ability.
The second investigation is internal, and is being carried out by OIOS at the request of the High Commissioner. A
statement was made about this by the Secretary-General’s Spokesperson in New York on Wednesday. There is not much I can
add to that given that this investigation is underway. Essentially however, this investigation concerns the manner in
which confidential information, and especially the identities of child victims and witnesses, as well as of the
investigators, was communicated to external actors in possible breach of strict rules that exist to protect victims,
witnesses and investigators. Obviously this is a matter of great importance, which is why such rules exist. Victims,
witnesses and investigators may be extremely vulnerable to reprisals. We know of plenty of cases elsewhere where they
have disappeared.
In addition, sources - especially victims and witnesses - must be able to give their informed consent before their
identities are shared with third parties. In the case of young children - and the youngest of the victims is believed to
have been between 8 and 9 years old - informed consent may not be obtained. So particular care must be taken in such
cases.
We are extremely concerned that in recent days copies of this preliminary compilation of unredacted interviews with
these children appear to have been given to journalists, possibly with the names still unredacted, and we urge any media
organization or other individual that has this document not to circulate that information any further. The protection of
sources must be of paramount importance. As a concrete illustration of this concern, we know for a fact that at least
one of the individuals named in this document has been contacted by a number of different media organizations over the
last few days. This is very worrying. I repeat the core issue here is the protection of witnesses, victims and
investigators and whether or not this was compromised, and indeed is still being compromised.
I would also like to clarify a number of elements that have been widely misreported.
First, this does not concern UN peacekeepers. The French force in CAR was not under the umbrella of the UN. This begs
the question: Why would OHCHR - or indeed the wider UN - try to protect French troops accused of such odious acts
against children by sitting on such information?
Secondly, there is the timeline. This will obviously be clarified during the investigation. But it is incorrect to say
this collection of interviews was submitted on 24 June. That was the date the last interview with one of the children
took place. As far as we are aware at this point – and I stress this remains to be established as fact by the
investigation – the document containing the interviews was apparently sent to Geneva in mid-July. And, as you are aware,
the French have said they started their investigation on 31 July.
ENDS