Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Gaza Strip: Attacks in the border areas
Gaza Strip: Attacks in the border areas and their consequences
Following disengagement from the Gaza Strip in September 2005, Israel unilaterally and illegally established a so-called “buffer zone”, an area prohibited to Palestinians along the land and sea borders of the Gaza Strip. The precise area designated by Israel as a “buffer zone” is not clear and this Israeli policy is typically enforced with live fire. The establishment of the ‘buffer zone’ is illegal under both Israeli and international law.
Preventing Palestinians from accessing their lands and fishing areas violates numerous provisions of international human rights law, including the right to work, the right to an adequate standard of living, and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. Enforcing the “buffer zone” through the use of live fire often results in, inter alia, the direct targeting of civilians and/or indiscriminate attacks, both of which constitute war crimes.
Following the Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip in November 2012, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Palestinian armed groups was brokered by the Egyptian government, which included terms related to access to land and sea. In an online statement on 25 February 2013, the Israeli Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) declared that fishermen could now access the sea up to six nautical miles offshore, and that farmers could now access lands in the border area up to 100m from the border fence. However, both references have since been removed from the statement.
Then, on 21 March 2013, the Israeli forces’ spokesperson announced re-reducing the fishing area allowed for Palestinian fishermen from 6 nautical miles to 3 nautical miles. However, on 21 May 2013, Israeli authorities decided to allow fishermen to sail up to 6 nautical miles.
Following the latest Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip (08 July - 26 August 2014), a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Palestinian armed groups was brokered by the Egyptian government, which allowed fishermen to sail up to 6 nautical miles. However, the Israeli naval forces have not allowed fishermen to sail up to this limit as all Israeli attacks have taken place within the 6-nautical- mile fishing area.
Dimensions
|
On land, inside Palestinian territory Distance from the border fence, up to which access is permitted: • Second Intifada (2000):
150 metres
| At sea, off the coast of the Gaza Strip Distance from the shore, up to which access is permitted: • Oslo
Accords (1994): 20 nautical
miles(nm) In addition, access is consistently denied in the following areas: • 1.5
nm in the north along the maritime boundary with
Israel |
Impact
| On land •
Approximately 27,000 dunums, 35% of the Gaza Strip's
agricultural land,can only be accessed under high
personal risk, as Israeli attacks may result in injury or
death of civilians. | At sea • Palestinians
are completely prevented from accessing 85% of the
Palestinian maritime areasrecognised in the 1994
Gaza Jericho Agreement.
|
Attacks
January 2014
| Attacks | Total | “Buffer zone” on land | “Buffer zone” at sea |
| Shelling | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shooting | 19 | 7 | 12 |
| Incursions | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Land levelling | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Detention incidents | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Total incidents | 26 | 12 | 14 |
Consequences of
attacks
a.
Deaths and injuries
January 2014
| Consequences | Total | “Buffer zone” on land | “Buffer zone” at sea |
| Death of persons | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minors | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Women | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Injury of persons | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Minors | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Women | 0 | 0 | 0 |
b. Property related
violations
January 2014
| Consequences | Total | “Buffer zone” on land | “Buffer zone” at sea |
| Property damaged | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Property confiscated | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dunums razed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
c.
Detention
January 2014
| Consequences | Total | “Buffer zone” on land | “Buffer zone” at sea |
| Detention incidents | 7 | 5 | 2 |
| Total persons detained | 16 | 8 | 8 |
| Minors detained | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Women detained | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ENDS
COP29: Navigating Ocean Finance - Investing In A Sustainable Blue Future
Global Strategic Communications Council: One Year After Signing The Tripling Pledge, Governments’ Targets Are Unchanged, Even As Solar’s Prospects Are Upgraded
UN Climate Change: Financing The Future - Vera Songwe’s Vision For A Climate And Growth Agenda At COP29
Glasgow Actions: At COP29, Global Activists Urge Strong Climate Finance Deal By Transforming Baku's Olympic Stadium Into Call For Action
Climate Action Network: COP29 - Repression Epidemic Regarding Climate Activists And Human Rights Defenders
Demand Climate Justice DCJ: Climate Justice Groups Condemn COP29’s Carbon Markets Decision - Corporate Profits vs People’s Interests