Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Maldives: Arbitrary removal of Supreme Court judges
Maldives: Arbitrary removal of Supreme Court judges deeply concerning, UN expert warns
Geneva, 22 December 2014 – The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, expressed today serious concern about the recent removal of former Supreme Court Chief Justice Ahmed Faiz and Judge Muthasim Adnan.
The removal of the two justices was approved by the People’s Majlis on 14 December, three days after the enactment of the First Amendment to the Judicature Act, which brought the number of Supreme Court judges down from seven to five.
“The procedure followed for the removal of the two Supreme Court judges by the Judicial Service Commission was characterized by lack of transparency and due process,” Ms. Knaul said. “The fact that the grounds for removal were not publicized is particularly unacceptable.”
“This decision seriously undermines the independence of the judiciary in the country and will have a chilling effect on the work of the judiciary at all levels,” the human rights expert stressed.
The Special Rapporteur recalled that judges can only be removed for reasons of incapacity or behaviour that renders them unfit to discharge their duties after a fair procedure subject to independent review. “International human rights standards are clear,” she noted.
“Article 154 of the Constitution of the Maldives itself states that a judge may be removed from office only if the Judicial Service Commission finds the person grossly incompetent, or guilty of gross misconduct,” Ms. Knaul added.
“Since my visit to the Maldives in February 2013 I have been closely following a series of developments in the country that point at a serious deterioration of respect for the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary,” she warned.
“I call upon the authorities of the Maldives to reconsider the removal of former Chief Justice Ahmed Faiz and Judge Muthasim Adnan and to engage in a transparent, impartial and independent process in line with its international human rights obligations and the recommendations I made in my report”, the UN Special Rapporteur added.
Gabriela Knaul took up
her functions as UN Special Rapporteur on the independence
of judges and lawyers on 1 August 2009. In that capacity,
she acts independently from any Government or organization.
Ms. Knaul has a long-standing experience as a judge in
Brazil and is an expert in criminal justice and the
administration of judicial systems.
Learn more, log on
to: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Judiciary/Pages/IDPIndex.aspx
The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
Check the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary: www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/IndependenceJudiciary.aspx
UN Human Rights, Country Page – Maldives: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/AsiaRegion/Pages/MVIndex.aspx
ENDS
Cook Islands Investment Incorporation: Government Partners With Communities To Improve Safety Shelters
Richard D. Wolff, IMI: Political Economy Contradictions As We Lurch Into 2025
People with Disability Australia - PWDA: CMHA And PWDA Demand Justice And Urgent Reform Following Death Of Simon Cartwright At Silverwater Jail
UNICEF Aotearoa NZ: Vanuatu Quake - UNICEF Aotearoa Launches Urgent Fundraising Appeal For 40,000 Children In Need
New Zealand Defence Force: Surveillance, Aid, Responders And Evacuees Covered By RNZAF Vanuatu Flights
Leonard C. Goodman, IMI: The Democratic Party Faces Its Day Of Reckoning