BANGLADESH: Attorney General's Office Supersedes High Court
BANGLADESH: Attorney General's Office Supersedes High
Court
•
• The Asian Human Rights Commission has
learned that direct intervention from the Attorney General's
Office of Bangladesh is preventing the release of ASM
Nasiruddin Elan, Director of Odhikar, a Bangladesh based
human rights organisations, despite the High Court having
granted bail to the prominent human rights defender. That
the Attorney General’s Office can impede a high court
order so easily, is a telling example of the rule of
lawlessness in Bangladesh.
•
• A Division Bench
comprising Justice Borhanuddin and Justice K.M. Kamrul Kader
of the High Court Division granted six months' interim bail
to Elan on 24 November 2013 after hearing a writ petition
filed on his behalf. A team from Odhikar were told by Mr.
Amanullah, a Deputy Jailor of the Kashimpur Jail-2 in
Gazipur, that Elan could not be released as there were
instructions from the Attorney General’s Office not to
release him.
•
• Elan's lawyer, Mr. Mohammad
Ruhul Ahim Bhuiyan, has informed the AHRC that he called Mr.
Amanullah, Deputy Jailor of Kashimpur Jail-2, on the
latter's cell phone (+8801717292501) today to check on
developments related to Elan’s release. The Deputy Jailor
told the lawyer that the High Court bail order has indeed
been received at Kashipur Jail. When Elan’s lawyer asked
when his client was going to be released, the Deputy Jailor
said that Mr. Elan could not be released from jail as jail
authorities have also received 'instruction' from the
Attorney General's Office not to release him. The Deputy
Jailor said, with regret, that until 'further instructions'
were received asking Jail authorities to release him, Elan
will have to remain in detention.
•
• After
learning about the same from Mr. Elan's lawyer, the Asian
Human Rights Commission called Deputy Jailor Amanullah on
his cell phone number at 2:37 p.m. Hong Kong local time. Mr.
Amanullah confirmed his official position during the two
minute conversation that en-sued. When the AHRC Staff Member
asked about the status of Mr. Elan's release in compli-ance
with the High Court order, Mr. Amanullah expressed himself
in colourful abusive lan-guage and before ending the
conversation.
•
• This is not the first time
Bangladesh's Attorney General's Office has prevented the
release of a detainee via illegal instruction. The AHRC has
learned from detainees, that in numerous cases in the last
five years, the Attorney General's Office has sent
telephonic or fax instructions to different jails to make a
mockery of court orders. All law officers of the State have
a funda-mental obligation to assist the courts to uphold the
rule of law. Such routine actions of the Bangladesh's
Attorney General and his team rubbish the basic principles
of justice.
•
• The AHRC demands an investigation
by a High Court Judge regarding interventions from the
Office of Attorney General to undermine the High Court
order. The interventions preventing the release of any
detainee, superseding a judicial order, violates all
fundamental norms of human rights. Instructing jail
authorities to prolong any person's detention, despite the
highest judicial order to release the detainee, is not only
a clear violation of the High Court order but also an utter
negation of the very existence of a judiciary in the
country.
Such instructions amount to contempt of court,
for which the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, obliged to
safeguard fundamental rights of citizens in compliance with
the Constitution of Bangladesh, as per Chapter IV of the
said Constitution, should immediately hold accountable the
entire group of attorneys work under the Office of the
Attorney General.
•
• If the Supreme Court of
Bangladesh fails to hold the Attorney General accountable
for such unconstitutional and lawless actions, the integrity
and independence of the judiciary and the dignity of the
judges will be deemed non-existent. Failure of the Supreme
Court, and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, to the
hold the Attorney General answerable will only provoke
others to take law into their own hands and ignore judicial
institutions of the
country.
ends