SEEMO/IPI Press Release:
SEEMO Concerned at Serbia Draft Law
Vienna, 6 November 2012 - The Vienna-based South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO), an affiliate of the
International Press Institute (IPI), is concerned at Serbia's draft Law on Fees for the Use of Public Goods, drafted by
the Ministry of Finance, whose provisions could undermine the independence of regulatory bodies in electronic
communications: the Republic Agency for Electronic Communications (RATEL) and the Republic Broadcasting Agency (RBA).
While the existing laws on broadcasting and electronic communication guarantee the independence of electronic
regulators, including financial independence, the draft law proposes that different fees should be channeled to the
state budget and then redistributed. This would also apply to the license fees for Serbia's public broadcasters, Radio
Televizija Srbije (RTS) and Radio Television Vojvodina (RTV).
By concentrating all these fees in the state budget, the government or ministries can exert influence on public services
and regulatory bodies through the way in which they allocate the budget. Media experts, regulatory bodies and
professional associations were not consulted during the elaboration of the draft law.
According to the recommendations of the Council of Europe, which Serbia is obliged to respect as a member of the Council
since 2003, public service broadcasters should not be directly financed by the state.
In a separate development, a commission appointed by the Ministry of Justice announced that defamation and libel would
remain within the Criminal Code, according to the Independent Journalists' Association of Serbia (NUNS). This implies,
the association underlined, that journalists could end up in prison if convicted of defamation.
"I hope that the Ministry of Finance changes the provisions in the draft law which undermines the independence of
regulatory bodies and of the public broadcasters," SEEMO Secretary General Oliver Vujovic said. "I hope that Serbia's
government complies with international standards both in the area of financing as well as regarding the decriminalising
of defamation. It is not acceptable that journalists could end up in prison if sued. The civil code should regulate
defamation."
ENDS