August 8, 2012
THAILAND: Five police convicted of murder in landmark ruling
The Asian Human Rights Commission greets with cautious optimism the landmark ruling of the Criminal Court in Bangkok to
convict five police officers for the murder of a teenager during the "war on drugs" in 2004, and hopes that it will
serve as a precedent of sorts for other cases of police and state officials accused of similar crimes.
On 30 July 2012, in Black Case No. 3252/2552, 3466/2552, the Criminal Court found five out of the six police officers
accused of murdering Kiettisak Thitboonkrong, age 17, in 2004. The six defendants were Pol. Snr. Sgt. Maj. Angkarn
Kammoonna, Pol. Snr. Sgt. Maj. Sutthinant Noenthing, Pol. Snr. Sgt. Maj. Phansilp Uppanant, Pol. Lt. Col. Samphao Indee,
Pol. Col. Montree Sriboonloue, and Pol. Lt. Col. Sumitr Nanthasathit, all officers stationed in Kalasin Province,
northeast Thailand. The police had arrested Kiettisak on 16 July 2004 for allegedly stealing a motorcycle. When his
family heard this news, they went to the police station and attempted to talk to him. After returning multiple times,
his grandmother was allowed to witness his interrogation on 22 July 2004 and told to wait for him to be bailed out later
that day. But Kiettisak never came home and several days later his mutilated body was found in a neighbouring province.
Following his death, his family launched a campaign to campaign to investigate and hold the police in Kalasin
accountable for his murder and the murders of 27 other individuals by police of the same station during and following
the so-called "war on drugs". After an extraordinary effort on their part to bring the killers of Kiettisak to justice,
the court finally reached its verdict just over a week ago. It sentenced three police officers to death for their
actions, while one it sentenced to life imprisonment, and one to seven years in prison.
It took Kiettisak's relatives seven years to secure this outcome. At their urging, in 2005, the Department of Special
Investigation (DSI) in the Ministry of Justice began investigating the case. It spent three years. On 18 May 2009, the
public prosecutor charged six police officers with premeditated murder and with concealing Kiettisak's corpse to hide
the cause of death. Because this case was investigated under the Special Investigation Act it was sent to the Criminal
Court in Bangkok. The public prosecutor conducted the case and Mr. Kittisapt Thitboonkrong, father of Mr. Kiettisak,
successfully sought and obtained permission from the court to act as a joint plaintiff, represented by lawyers from the
Lawyers' Council of Thailand working pro bono. The hearings took another three years. Observers for the AHRC attended
many of the hearings throughout the duration of the trial.
In its verdict, the Criminal Court found Pol. Snr. Sgt. Maj. Angkarn Kammoonna, Pol. Snr. Sgt. Maj. Sutthinant Noenthing
guilty of premeditated murder and hiding a corpse. It sentenced them to death. Pol. Lt. Col. Sumitr Nanthasathit it
found guilty of premeditated murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Pol. Col. Montree Sriboonloue it found
guilty of abusing his authority to aid in protecting his subordinates from criminal prosecution and sentenced him to
seven years’ imprisonment. The Criminal Court found Pol. Lt. Col. Samphao Indee innocent of involvement in the murder of
Mr. Kiettisak.
With some reservations, the AHRC considers this ruling an important step towards ending impunity for state violence in
Thailand. It is the first case of which the AHRC is aware in which police responsible for killings during the "war on
drugs" under the government of ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra have been held to account for their crimes. It
is also the first case arising from the so-called "war" that the DSI investigated. In February 2003, Thaksin announced
the beginning of the "war" with an unequivocal message to police and other state officials--that any and all necessary
actions should be taken to free the country of the drug menace, including killing. Over the next three months, it became
clear that the message served as a carte blanche for the use of murderous violence against citizens, rather than using
the provisions of the Criminal Code to investigate and prosecute. By May 2003, an estimated number of over 2500 people
had been killed. Kalasin Province was the first province in the country that the government declared had "won" the war.
This ephemeral victory was achieved at the cost of many lives taken illegally, at the hands or bidding of state agents.
Kiettisak was but one victim.
Rather than holding state officials who used extrajudicial violence against these citizens to account, in the worst
cases, perpetrators of crimes have been rewarded. In most cases they have been tacitly and conveniently ignored. One of
the long-term effects of this approach has been the further consolidation of impunity for state violence in Thailand.
Therefore, this case stands out among other cases of extrajudicial killing in Thailand over the last ten years, in which
courts have been unwilling to hold state officials to account, notably in the cases of the mass deaths in custody
following the Tak Bai incident, and the April-May 2010 killings. Even in cases in which courts have ruled that a citizen
has died while in state custody due to the actions of state officials, such as the March 2009 torture and death of Imam
Yapa Kaseng, the actions of state officials have been classed as matters of official "duty" and they have been exempted
from allegations of murder. This is the larger context in which Kiettisak was murdered, in which his relatives and other
Kalasin residents struggled to secure justice and accountability, and against which the Criminal Court gave its ruling.
Given that this is also the first case in which a court decision has been reached, the AHRC welcomes the guilty verdict
as a clear sign that the judiciary is willing to hold police to account for their use of extrajudicial violence against
citizens. At the same time, the AHRC as a matter of principle opposes the death penalty under all circumstances, and
calls for the sentences in this case to be reviewed, such that the convicted police officers instead receive appropriate
prison terms.
Additionally, the AHRC is gravely concerned that the convicted officers have obtained bail pending appeal. The
convictions for these sentences are of such gravity that good reason exists to expect that the convicted police will
attempt to evade punishment by absconding or other means. They may also seek to obtain revenge against one or more
persons who testified against them. In the well-known case of disappeared human rights lawyer Somchai Neelaphaijit, the
one officer convicted of an offence in connection with his disappearance himself subsequently disappeared, and is
suspected to have faked his own death; he was subsequently acquitted on appeal. In the meantime, Somchai's family
received frequent threats against their own lives. The AHRC fears that in this case too the convicted police if allowed
to walk free pending appeal may yet find ways and means to pervert the course of justice and undermine this hard-fought
result. Consequently, it urges that the granting of bail be revoked and the five convicted officers be imprisoned while
awaiting appeal outcomes.
Finally, the text of the court decision was not read in its entirety on the day the decision was announced in the
Criminal Court, and the Asian Human Rights Commission is awaiting the release of the full judgment by the Criminal
Court. We call on the Criminal Court to make this important decision available to the public as soon as possible. In the
coming weeks, the AHRC will undertake a detailed analysis of the court decision in the case of the murder of Kiettisak
Thitboonkrong with respect to the political and legal context and history of impunity for state violence in Thailand as
well as the relevant international human rights standards.
About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation that monitors human rights in Asia,
documents violations and advocates for justice and institutional reform to ensure the protection and promotion of these
rights. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.
Visit our new website with more features at www.humanrights.asia.
ENDS