The Struggle to Affirm the Dignity of the Poor in a Society in which we don’t Count
by S’bu Zikode, Presented in Mexico City on 6th August 2012
Before Abahlali baseMjondolo was formed the shack dwellers in South Africa were considered by government and some other
people in our society to be the undeserving poor. This claim came as the result of the perception that the poor are
lazy, uneducated and people who do not think and therefore do not count the same as other human beings. The general
public, civil society and the media could not defend the poor against this indignity. The media had little or nothing to
report on anything that surrounds shack dwellers, be it good or bad, that considered us as human beings or citizens. We
were mostly seen as a threat to society – as a problem to be controlled. When shacks were on fire radios and televisions
would not air or broadcast this. On the other side the state would refuse any provision of basic services to the shack
settlements or to engage us as citizens. We have always been considered as people who cannot think for ourselves.
Someone from somewhere else would always be hired and paid to think for us, to represent us and to take decisions on our
behalf. This has been the state mentality towards the poor. It has also been the mentality of most NGOs and of most of
civil society. It has also been the mentality of what we have called the regressive left – that part of the left that
thinks that its job is to think for the poor rather than with the poor. The rights that we have on paper were always
refused in reality. This included our rights as citizens and our rights to the cities. Whenever we asked for our rights
to be respected, for our humanity to be recognized, we were presented as troublemakers, as people that were being used
by others, or as criminals. Our request to participate in the discussions about our own lives was taken as a threat.
Abahlali has been mobilizing to build the power of the poor from below. We try to make sure that the poor remain
permanently organized and strong. This has helped to build a strong voice for the movement. As a result of the power
that we have built from the ground up we have been able to speak for ourselves in many spaces that were previously
barred to us. For us it is important that, just as we occupy land in the cities, we must also occupy our own space in
all discussions.
Today, as a result of our struggle and the struggles of other poor people, we see a slow shift away from seeing shack
settlements as something to be bulldozed without any sense that there are human lives in these places. There is now
recognition that there are human lives in the shacks. Basic services such as water and sanitation, refuse collection,
road access, electricity etc which were being denied are now being rolled out. In Durban the eThekwini Municipality has
long had a policy that forbids electrification of any shack settlement in the city. Today this killer electricity policy
is under review and a pilot project to roll electricity in some four settlements has begun. This progress has come
through the years of struggle and the power of the organized poor.
For many years shack settlements were seen as a problem to be solved by eradication. This was the logic of apartheid but
it came back to South Africa after apartheid through the way that the UN Millennium Development Goals were interpreted.
In South Africa the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial government wanted to be seen as smart and leading the way in carrying the
mandate of the MDGs by introducing the then ‘Slums Act’ which would have led to mass evictions We took that Act to the
highest court in our land - the Constitutional Court - where it was ruled unconstitutional. This judgment has a lot to
say about transforming the understanding of shack settlements so that we can all see them as communities to be
integrated in our urban centers. It has a lot of emphasis on the need for the state to conduct meaningful engagement
with communities. This means that while shack dwellers wait for their permanent homes basic services and support would
have to be provided. The new developments would have to be co-designed with the people that will live in them.
Participatory and democratic development via in-situ upgrades should be promoted and supported in order to put a stop to
all unlawful evictions and corruption. Well located land is to be released for housing development.
As a movement we have succeed in building a real challenge to the eradication agenda and to the eviction of shack
dwellers from citizenship as well as good land. The government’s approach to housing has lost its credibility through
the struggles of the poor around the country. But houses for the urban poor have not yet been built at the pace and in
the manner that respects shack dwellers. Therefore our struggle has only gone half of the way that it needs to go.
But we are proud and happy that we have built communities and a strong movement. We have stopped evictions in the areas
we were ware strong and changed the perception that development can happen in our own neighborhoods without us. We have
refused just to be told what will be done to us and to be excluded from democracy and decision making. We have concluded
that there will be nothing for us without us. The state and anyone wanting to upgrade or develop our communities is
required to co-plan with us and have to have meaningful engagement with us on all issues. Slowly, slowly it is being
understood in wider society that shack settlements are not eyesores to be bulldozed but communities to be upgraded. It
is slowly being understood that if land is allocated by the market the poor will always be excluded from the cities. We
are slowly building more alliances in our struggle for a conscientious society based on respect and dignity for all
people.
These shifts have come after years of struggle to be counted as human beings. These shifts have come after years of
discussions where we have worked out our vision for a society where real freedom, equality, justice and dignity are the
rule of the day. These shifts have come as a result of our own hard won living politic. They have come as a result of
our own courage to insist that everyone’s life and intelligence counts the same. That everyone deserves the same equal
opportunities as everyone else. That the social value of land should come before its commercial value. That all the
production and gains of the country should be fairly distributed to all its inhabitants. That in dealing with all of the
above we should start with the worst off. As Anglican Bishop Ruben says “the last shall be first”.
However the government still shows no political will to engage meaningfully with the shack dwellers and poor people’s
movements. The state and its politicians impose its party opportunists to monopolize and hijack the system and
politicize services so that only party members benefit. The state continues to build transit camps and force people into
these places where they are left to rot. The state continues to harass, beat, arrest and even kill activists who are
calling for real freedom and democracy for all. Our struggle has a long and hard road to travel before we can say that
we have started to build democratic cities.------------ http://www.abahlali.org
Sekwanele! No House! No Land! No Vote! Everyone Counts
--
For more, please visit the website of the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign at: www.antieviction.org.za and follow us on www.twitter.com/antieviction
Visit Abahlali baseMjondolo at www.abahlali.org and www.khayelitshastruggles.com
The Poor People's Alliance: Abahlali baseMjondolo, together with with Landless People's Movement (Gauteng), the Rural
Network (KwaZulu-Natal) and the Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign, is part of the Poor People's Alliance - a unfunded
national network of democratic membership based poor people's movements.
ENDS