PHRC deplores US Senate threat to Palestinian bid for UN recognition
Leslie Bravery
4 July 2011
The passing by the United States Senate of Resolution 185, calling on Palestinians to halt their bid for recognition of
statehood at the United Nations, reveals once again the extent of unreasoning bias in favour of Israel. The Senate also
called on Obama to use the US veto in the forthcoming September vote. There is a cruel cynicism in the threat to
withdraw the $550 million that the United States provides to the Palestinians annually, bearing in mind that Obama's
2012 budget proposes $3.075 billion in US military aid for Israel. That is $75 million more than in 2011 and US military
aid is expected to increase by a further $25 million to $3.1 billion in 2013. The Occupying power's belligerence is
further encouraged with the joint US-Israel missile defence programmes, including the 'Arrow' and 'David's Sling', which
are expected to receive $106.1 million in 2012.
US objections to the Palestinians turning to the United Nations or other international bodies are a panic reaction
because direct negotiations - the so-called peace process - have proved to be nothing but a cover for Israeli
territorial gains. According to the terms of the Oslo agreement of 1993 (the mutual recognition agreement signed by
Yasir Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin), the Palestinians were promised self-determination by 2000 at the latest. In the past 18
years, Israel has tightened its grip on Palestine, including blockade and absolute control of Gaza's air, land and sea
entry points. Israel's blockade of Gaza is a clear violation of international humanitarian law, the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) says Israel is punishing the whole civilian population of Gaza describing conditions
in Gaza that include hospitals short of equipment, power cuts lasting hours each day and drinking water unfit for
consumption. "The whole of Gaza's civilian population is being punished for acts for which they bear no responsibility.
A Red Cross statement said the closure therefore "...constitutes a collective punishment imposed in clear violation of
Israel's obligations under international humanitarian law."
In direct contravention of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention Israel has trebled the rate of transfer of its
citizens into occupied territory from 100,000 to over 300,000. Turning a blind eye to Israeli-state terrorism, US Senate
Resolution 185 calls for the Palestinian unity government to "publicly and formally forswear terrorism, accept Israel's
right to exist, and reaffirm previous agreements made with the Government of Israel." The US has never demanded that
Israel forswear its militarism against the Palestinian people. As for Israel's so-called US/Israeli defined 'right to
exist', the Zionist state's ideologically racist policies of Occupation settlement in the West Bank and discrimination
within its borders are indefensible. Formal recognition of such a state of affairs would not only be offensive but also
contrary to international law.
The crime of apartheid
Israel defines itself as a state of the Jewish people. Discrimination, such as the revocation of Israeli Arab
citizenship, the absentee property law, the theft of land and occupation settlement are all directed at non-Jews.
Consequently, many Jewish people are offended when the Israeli state claims that it speaks for them. The crime of
apartheid is defined by the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as inhumane acts of a character
similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalised regime of systematic
oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of
maintaining that regime."
The path to peace lies in respect for, and observance of, international law. Ideologies that, by harming others, seek to
accord a privileged status for any racial or ethnic group should be outlawed. Failure to uphold justice plays into the
hands of extremists and is destabilising. If humanitarianism doesn't have sufficient appeal, our elected leaders might
at least consider enlightened self-interest because the path they have followed has failed, totally. If acceded to, the
demand for recognition of the discriminatory Zionist state demanded of Israel's victims would be tantamount both to
surrendering to the crime of apartheid as well as acquiescence in it. Discouraging the Palestinians from seeking a state
could end with the demise of Zionism sooner than anyone might expect. A single state solution is looking ever more
likely.
ENDS