"Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War"
May 2011
The World is at a critical crossroads. The Fukushima disaster in Japan has brought to the forefront the dangers of
Worldwide nuclear radiation.
Coinciding with the onset of the nuclear crisis in Japan, a new regional war theater has opened up in North Africa,
under the disguise of a UN sponsored "humanitarian operation" with the mandate to "protect civilian lives".
These two seemingly unrelated events are of crucial importance in understanding both the nuclear issue as well as the
ongoing US-NATO sponsored war, which has now extended its grip into Libya. The crisis in Japan has been described as "a
nuclear war without a war". Its potential repercussions, which are yet to be fully assessed, are far more serious than
the Chernobyl disaster, as acknowledged by several scientists.
The crisis in Japan has also brought into the open the unspoken relationship between nuclear energy and nuclear war.
Nuclear energy is not a civilian economic activity. It is an appendage of the nuclear weapons industry which is
controlled by the so-called defense contractors. The powerful corporate interests behind nuclear energy and nuclear
weapons overlap. In Japan at the height of the disaster, "the nuclear industry and government agencies [were] scrambling
to prevent the discovery of atomic-bomb research facilities hidden inside Japan's civilian nuclear power plants". The
media consensus is that the crisis at Fukushima's five nuclear power plants has been contained. The realties are
otherwise. The Japanese government has been obliged to acknowledge that "the severity rating of its nuclear crisis ...
matches that of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster". Moreover, the dumping of highly radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean
constitutes a potential trigger to a process of global radioactive contamination. Radioactive elements have not only
been detected in the food chain in Japan, radioactive rain water has been recorded in California:
"Hazardous radioactive elements being released in the sea and air around Fukushima accumulate at each step of various
food chains (for example, into algae, crustaceans, small fish, bigger fish, then humans; or soil, grass, cow's meat and
milk, then humans). Entering the body, these elements - called internal emitters - migrate to specific organs such as
the thyroid, liver, bone, and brain, continuously irradiating small volumes of cells with high doses of alpha, beta
and/or gamma radiation, and over many years often induce cancer".
A New War Theater in North Africa
The War on Libya was launched within days of the Fukushima disaster. As we go to press, a dangerous process of military
escalation is ongoing. NATO warplanes are hitting civilian targets in Libya including residential areas and government
buildings in violation of international law.
The war on Libya is an integral part of the broader military agenda in the Middle East and Central Asia which until
recently consisted of three distinct areas of conflict: Afghanistan and Pakistan (the AfPak War), Iraq, Palestine. A
fourth war theater has opened up in North Africa, which raises the issue of escalation over a vast geographical area.
These four war theaters are interrelated. They are part of a broader region of conflict, which extends from North Africa
and the Middle East, engulfing a large part of the Mediterranean basin, to China's Western frontier with Afghanistan,
and Northern Pakistan.
How does the war on Libya relate to this broader US-NATO military agenda?
Is a World War III scenario unfolding?
Is the use of nuclear weapons contemplated in North Africa?
With regard to nuclear doctrine, the concept of a US sponsored pre-emptive nuclear attack applies to a number of
countries or "rogue states" including Libya. An all out war against the Qadhafi regime has been on the drawing board of
the Pentagon for more than 20 years, Moreover, Libya was the first country to be tagged for a preemptive attack using
tactical nuclear weapons. The Clinton administration's plan to nuke Libya had been announced in no uncertain terms in a
1996 Department of Defense press briefing:
"[The] Air Force would use the B61-11 [nuclear weapon] against Libya's alleged underground chemical weapons plant at
Tarhunah if the President decided that the plant had to be destroyed. 'We could not take [Tarhunah] out of commission
using strictly conventional weapons,' Smith told the Associated Press. The B61-11 'would be the nuclear weapon of
choice,' he [Assistant Secretary of Defense Harold P. Smith] told Jane Defence Weekly.
Clinton's Defense Secretary William Perry had confirmed in a statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that
"the U.S. retained the option of using nuclear weapons against countries [e.g. Libya] armed with chemical and biological
weapons." The Department of Defense's objective was to fast track the "testing" of the B61-11 nuclear bomb on an actual
country and that country was Libya: "Even before the B61 came on line, Libya was identified as a potential target".
While the 1996 plan to bomb Libya using tactical nuclear weapons was subsequently shelved, Libya was not removed from
the "black list": "The Qadhafi regime" remains to this date a target country for a pre-emptive ("defensive") nuclear
attack. As revealed by William Arkin in early 2002, "The Bush administration, in a secret policy review... [had] ordered
the Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only
Russia and the "axis of evil" Iraq, Iran, and North Korea but also China, Libya and Syria.
Operation Odyssey Dawn. Nuclear Weapons against Libya? How Real is the Threat?
Has the project to nuke Libya been definitively shelved or is Libya still being contemplated as a potential target for a
nuclear attack? (This preface serves as an update on the potential dangers of a nuclear war against a defenseless
non-nuclear State). The air campaign directed against Libya commenced on March 19, 2011. America deployed its Bat-shaped
B-2 Spirit Stealth bombers operating out of the Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Described as "deadly and
effective", the B-2 was used as an instrument of "humanitarian warfare".
Barely two weeks after the commencement of the war, the Pentagon announced the testing of the B61-11 nuclear bomb using
the same B-2 Stealth bombers which had been deployed to Libya at the very outset of Operation Odyssey Dawn. The B-2
Spirit Stealth bomber is the US Air Force's chosen "carrier" for the delivery of the B61-11 nuclear bomb. These timely
tests pertained to the installed equipment, functionality and weapon's components of the B61-11 nuclear bomb. The tests
were conducted by the B-2 bombers operating out of the same Air Force base, from which the B-2 bombing raid on Libya
were conducted.
Is the timing of these tests in any way related to the chronology of the Libya bombing campaign?
The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command was in charge of both the JTA tests of the B61-11 as well as the deployment of
three B-2 Spirit Stealth bombers to Libya on March 19 under operation Odyssey Dawn. Both the deployment of the B-2s to
the Libya war theater as well as the tests of the equipment of the B61-11 (using the B-2 bomber for delivery) were
coordinated out of Whiteman Air Force base.
America's Long War: The Global Military Agenda
The US has embarked on a military adventure, “a long war”, which threatens the future of humanity. The first two
chapters of this E-book focus on the "Cult of Death and Destruction" underlying this global military agenda. US-NATO
weapons of mass destruction are portrayed as instruments of peace. Mini-nukes are said to be "harmless to the
surrounding civilian population". Pre-emptive nuclear war is portrayed as a "humanitarian undertaking". Nuclear war has
become a multibillion dollar undertaking, which fills the pockets of US defense contractors. What is at stake is the
outright "privatization of nuclear war".
US nuclear doctrine is intimately related to "America's War on Terrorism" and the alleged threat of Al Qaeda, which in a
bitter irony is considered as an upcoming nuclear power. Under the Obama administration, Islamic terrorists are said to
be preparing to attack US cities. Proliferation is tacitly equated with “nuclear terrorism”. Obama's nuclear doctrine
puts particular emphasis on “nuclear terrorism” and on the alleged plans by Al Qaeda to develop and use nuclear weapons.
Chapter III focusses on America's Holy Crusade and the Battle for Oil. The “Global War on Terrorism” requires going
after the terrorists, using advanced weapons systems. US foreign policy upholds a pre-emptive religious-like crusade
against evil, which serves to obscure the real objectives of military action. In the inner consciousness of Americans,
the attacks of September 11, 2001 justify acts of war and conquest against evil-doers. The Global War on Terrorism is
presented as a “clash of civilizations”, a war between competing values and religions, when in reality it is an outright
war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives. The lies behind 9/11 are known and documented. The
American people’s acceptance of this crusade against evil is not based on any rational understanding or analysis of the
facts. "The American inquisition" purports to extend Washington’s sphere of influence. Military intervention is
justified as part of an international campaign against “Islamic terrorists”. Its ultimate intention, which is never
mentioned in press reports, is territorial conquest and control over strategic resources. Ironically, under the Global
War on Terrorism, these plans of conquest are instrumented by covertly supporting Islamic paramilitary armies, which are
then used to destabilize non-compliant governments and impose Western standards of "governance" and "democracy".
World War III Scenario
The contours of a World War III scenario are discussed in Chapter IV. The Pentagon’s global military design is one of
world conquest. The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously.
Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire
planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO
Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: “[The]
five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran,
Somalia and Sudan.”
Chapter V focusses on war preparations pertaining to Iran, including the launching of a pre-emptive nuclear attack on
the Islamic Republic. While Iran remains on the Pentagon's drawing board, a fundamental shift in the sequencing of
military operations has occurred. The US-NATO-Israel alliance realizes that Iran has significant capabilities to respond
and retaliate. With the onset of the US-NATO led war in North Africa, Washington and its allies have chosen to wage war
on countries with lesser military capabilities. This factor in itself has been crucial in the decision by the US and its
allies to put "the Iran operation" on hold, while launching a "humanitarian war" on Libya.
How to Reverse the Tide of War
Chapter VI focusses on antiwar actions directed against this diabolical military agenda. Central to an understanding of
war, is the media campaign which grants it legitimacy in the eyes of public opinion. A good versus evil dichotomy
prevails. The perpetrators of war are presented as the victims. Public opinion is misled: “We must fight against evil in
all its forms as a means to preserving the Western way of life.” Breaking the "big lie" which upholds war as a
humanitarian undertaking, means breaking a criminal project of global destruction, in which the quest for profit is the
overriding force. This profit-driven military agenda destroys human values and transforms people into unconscious
zombies.
The holding of mass demonstrations and antiwar protests is not enough. What is required is the development of a broad
and well organized grassroots antiwar network, across the land, nationally and internationally, which challenges the
structures of power and authority. People must mobilize not only against the military agenda, the authority of the state
and its officials must also be challenged. This war can be prevented if people forcefully confront their governments,
pressure their elected representatives, organize at the local level in towns, villages and municipalities, spread the
word, inform their fellow citizens as to the implications of a nuclear war, initiate debate and discussion within the
armed forces.
The object of this E-Book is to forcefully reverse the tide of war, challenge the war criminals in high office and the
powerful corporate lobby groups which support them.
Break the American Inquisition.
Undermine the US-NATO-Israel military crusade.
Close down the weapons factories and the military bases.
Members of the armed forces should disobey orders and refuse to participate in a criminal war.
Bring home the troops.
Montreal, May 2011
*************
Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (Emeritus) at the University of Ottawa. He is
the Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal and Editor of the globalresearch.ca
website. He is the author of The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003) and America’s “War on
Terrorism” (2005). He is also a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more
than twenty languages.
Order your pdf of this important new book from Global Research here
Introductory offer: $5.00 (plus $1.50 processing fee. Sent directly to your email!)