Papuan Peace Network Is Not Connected With UP4B, Says Tebau
Papuan Peace Network Is Not Connected With UP4B, Says
Father Tebay
Father Neles Tebay, co-ordinator of the Papuan Peace Network, has denied reports that he has agreed to support the government's programme, UP4B in exchange for securing the government's agreement for a dialogue with the Papuan people.
UP4B, the Unit for
Accelerating the Development of the Provinces of
Papua
and West Papua, has recently been launched by
Jakarta.
Father Tebay said that some circles were claiming
that the Network had
abandoned its support for a
Dialogue in favour of 'Constructive
Communications'
which was mentioned as the way forward for Papua in a
recent speech by President Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono.
In a press release, Father Tebay said that no
one in the Papuan Peace
Network was in any way involved
in the UP4B, which is a programme of a
central
government and it is up to the central government and the
governments of the provinces of Papua and West Papua to
explain what that programme will do.
He said that his
network intends to provide a bridge for all the
endeavours aimed at holding a dialogue to resolve the
Papuan issue He
stressed that the emergence of the UP4B
was not in any way the result of efforts by the Network.
There is, he stressed, no connection with the government's
programme.He said that people in Papua were still waiting
for clarifications from the government about the aims and
objectives of the UP4B which is just a government
programme.
He explained that in order to bring about the
Jakarta-Papua dialogue,
there was the need for various
forms of public political
consultations, seminars,
formal and informal discussions, either
person-to-person
or between groups, in order to provide the space for
the
dialgue to take place.
He strongly denied that there has
been any trade-off with the
Jakarta-Papua dialogue which
would involve quite a difficult struggle.
He said that
the Papuan Peace Network had been approached by the
government for its opinion about the UP4B and in doing
so, he had
stressed the importance of holding a
dialogue. The procedures and
objectives of the UP4B were
entirely up to the government while his
network had no
way of knowing whether any of its thoughts had been
taken
on board by the government.
As for the Constructive
Communications proposed by the government, he
expressed
the hope that the government would provide a clear
explanation about what this was intended to do so that
the Papuan
people were able to understand what it was all
about.
ENDS