Botswana Government Rejects High-Profile Court Ruling
Botswana government rejects high-profile court ruling
December 14, 2010
[1] Four years on
from a court victory which saw the [2] Kalahari Bushmen win
the right to live on their ancestral lands, the Botswana
government has issued a statement flouting the ruling.
Links:
1. http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6766
2. http://www.survivalinternational.org/tribes/bushmen
In
2002, the Botswana government forcibly evicted the Bushmen
from their ancestral lands inside the Central Kalahari Game
Reserve. On 13th December 2006, after the longest and most
expensive legal battle in the country’s history,
Botswana’s High Court ruled that the government had
[3]forcibly evicted the Bushmen from their lands illegally
and unconstitutionally. Links:
3. http://www.survivalinternational.org/tribes/bushmen/courtcase#main
However, since the ruling, the government has continued to prevent the Bushmen from returning home, and has issued a statement that flies in the face of the High Court judgment.
In the statement, the government claims that it ‘does not force [the Bushmen] to move out of the Game Reserve’, and that the Bushmen ‘have welcomed the developments at their new settlements’. However, the court found that the Bushmen ‘were dispossessed of the land they occupied wrongfully and unlawfully and without their consent.’
The statement also argues that the government has provided the Bushmen with ‘developments at their new settlements, such as the provision of educational and medical facilities, and numerous other opportunities, for improving their quality of life.’ Yet 13 years after the main resettlement camp was created, virtually no Bushmen have found permanent employment, and alcoholism and disease are rife. As one of the judges said, ‘[The government] might want to consider whether the disappearance of a people isn’t too high a price to pay for offering services at a centralized location’.
Despite the court finding that the
‘simultaneous stoppage of the supply of food rations and
the issuing of [hunting licences] is tantamount to
condemning the remaining residents of the [reserve]
to death by starvation’, the government has banned the
Bushmen from [4]accessing water or hunting for food on their
own lands. Its statement accuses the Bushmen of
‘poaching’ on their own lands, arguing that this has led
to ‘a decline of all species in the reserve’, even
though there is no evidence for this. Links:
4. http://www.survivalinternational.org/tribes/bushmen/water#main
The
government statement also criticizes Survival, arguing
that the organization ‘wants [the Bushmen] to live a life
of poverty and disease’. However, one of the judges
praised [5]Survival International for giving ‘courage and
support to a people who historically were too weak
economically and politically to question decisions affecting
them’. Links:
5. http://www.survivalinternational.org
Survival’s
director, Stephen Corry, said today, ‘'The Botswana
government is now just repeating the same old stuff it said
in 2002, and which was proved to be a complete
fabrication. It’s not just Survival which said the
government had made it all up, countless independent
journalists who visited the area confirmed it. The
government is trying to clear the Bushmen off their lands
for [6]diamond mining and tourism, it's as simple as that.
It’s been trying for thirteen years and might succeed.
Survival will intensify its [7]calls for boycotts of
diamonds and tourism. Let the consumer decide if he or she
wants to be party to the destruction of the Bushmen.’
Links:
6. http://www.survivalinternational.org/tribes/bushmen/diamonds#main
7. http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6519
To read this story online: http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6766
ENDS