Mass Resignations at Bhutan Paper Raise Concerns
Media Release: Bhutan
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is alarmed to learn of the mass resignation of all journalists from the Bhutan Times, after sharp disagreements on editorial process and content with a newly appointed chief executive.
According to reports from IFJ partners,
ownership of Bhutan’s first privately owned newspaper
changed hands early in October, after the company ran up
accumulated losses of about USD 116,000. Wancha Sangey, the
new chief executive, has since been seeking to impose his
will on the editorial staff, reportedly causing serious
demoralisation within the ranks.
Among the journalists
who have resigned is the editor, Gopilal Acharya, who has
reportedly said he was quitting to “protect the
professional values and principles of independent journalism
in Bhutan”.
Sangey is credited with the view that
freedom of speech is very important, though not at the cost
of forgetting Bhutanese identity. “You can slur a ministry
if it is wrong, but not Bhutan as a nation,” he is
reported to have said.
Since taking charge, Sangey has
reportedly sat in on editorial meetings and publicly
upbraided reporters and editorial writers. He has directed
administrative staff to mark all internal and external
communications to him, even when these concern editorial
matters. And he has issued an advertisement in the newspaper
asking that public comments on content be sent directly to
his email address or phoned in on his mobile
number.
“The IFJ wishes the Bhutan Times well and
would greatly appreciate any strategy that helps it overcome
its current financial difficulties and establish it as a
viable news platform working in the public interest,” IFJ
Asia-Pacific Director Jacqueline Park said.
“But we
are deeply concerned that the new chief executive of the
newspaper is following an entirely wrong tack in seeking to
turn around the newspaper.
“No successful newspaper
can be run by assaulting the professional morale of
journalists and questioning the basic premises on which they
conduct their daily
tasks.”
ENDS