June 14, 2007: Daily Press Briefing

Daily Press Briefing
Sean McCormack, Spokesman
Washington, DC
June 14, 2007

INDEX:

ISRAEL/PALESTINIANS
Situation in Gaza / Secretary's Call to President Abbas
Way to Achieve Palestinian State is Through Negotiation Not
Violence
Possible Dissolution of Palestinian Government / State of
Emergency
Divisions within Hamas / Haniya's Role / Hamas is a Terrorist
Organization
State Department Officials' Contact with Other Governments on this
Issue
U.S. Assessment of Hamas' Control in Gaza
Impact on West Bank / Ultimate Victims are Palestinian People
Dreams of Palestinian State Diminished by Acts of Violence
Security Assistance Program
U.S. Will not Abandon Palestinian People in Gaza
Need to Resolve Contradictions within Palestinian Political System
No Equivalence between Terrorist Organization and Legitimate
Institutions of Palestinian Authority
U.S. Will Stand with Those that Want to Negotiate for a
Palestinian State
Ban Ki-moon's Proposal for International Force in Gaza
UN Report by Alvaro De Soto
Need to Work with Moderate Forces within Palestinian Political
System
Secretary's Travel Plans / No Changes
Secretary's Discussions with Egyptian Foreign Minister
U.S. Ambassador Spoke with Jordanian Government
General Dayton's Activities and Role
Status of Benchmarks / Assistance to Palestinian Forces
Tomorrow's Meeting of Arab Foreign Ministers
Strategy to Build Up Institutions for a Palestinian State

AUSTRIA Death of Kurt Waldheim

NORTH KOREA Status of BDA Issue / Look Forward to Transactions being Completed and Moving Forward Assistant Secretary Hill's Travel

TURKEY / IRAQ Reported Proposal to Create Buffer Zone Extending into Iraq to Protect from PKK

TRANSCRIPT:

View Video

1:45 p.m. EDT MR. MCCORMACK: No opening statements. I'm ready to get into your questions. Who wants to start?

QUESTION: I understand the Secretary's made at least one call about the situation in Gaza.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, she talked to President Abbas. I'm not going to get into a lot of details of the phone call, but essentially it was to talk to him about the current situation, the situation as he saw it and to underline the United States's support for President Abbas, for the Palestinian moderates who have made the commitment to working with the Israeli Government and working with others around the world on the issue of peace in the Middle East.

Clearly, those among the Palestinian population in the Palestinian political system who have chosen the pathway to peace, who have been advocates for that are people with whom we are going to work. That choice has been challenged by those individuals in Gaza who have attacked the legitimate security forces of the Palestinian Authority, who have in a premeditated way decided that they are going to try to extinguish the hopes of the Palestinian people for their own state. Because make no mistake about it, that the way to achieve a Palestinian state is via the negotiating table. It's never going to be achieved via the use of violence, threats, intimidation or terrorism.

QUESTION: Does she have or does the United States have any opinion on the ideas or suggestions that the government be dissolved?

MR. MCCORMACK: I've seen of the suggestions in the press. There is obviously a lot of churning, a lot of ferment within the Palestinian political system right now to deal with this issue, this challenge, to the expressed wishes of the Palestinian people for their own state. I haven't seen President Abbas come out with any formal statement. I think that we'll wait until he speaks and talks to the Palestinian people first about what it is he has decided to do, what course of action he would like the Palestinian people to follow. And then at that point, I'm sure we'll have some comment on whatever it is that he talks to the Palestinian people about.

QUESTION: Did the Secretary get the impression from him on his phone call that such a statement or speech or whatever is -- would be forthcoming?

MR. MCCORMACK: I am -- two things, one, not going to get into the details of the phone call as you might expect. And two, anything that President Abbas has to say, we're going to let him --

QUESTION: I'm not asking you what -- do you expect there to be some kind of a statement from the President?

MR. MCCORMACK: Let's just see what President Abbas has to say in his -- speaking to the Palestinian people. If he chooses to make an announcement, the Palestinians will talk about the timing and place of such an announcement. It's not for me to make.

QUESTION: Sean, did she initiate the call?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yes, she did.

QUESTION: She did.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah. Sylvie.

QUESTION: You spoke earlier about divisions within Hamas.

MR. MCCORMACK: Mm-hmm.

QUESTION: And you said that the U.S. views regarding Haniya's participation in Hamas hasn't changed.

MR. MCCORMACK: Correct.

QUESTION: Does it mean that if Haniya were to quit Hamas you would deal with him?

MR. MCCORMACK: I suppose we would address that situation if we were faced with that fact. We are not faced with that fact at this point. Hamas is a terrorist organization. We consider members of Hamas to be members of a terrorist organization and that hasn't changed.

I talked a little bit this morning and yesterday about the fact that you do see some of these divisions cropping up within Hamas and that is based on a number of different indicators. As these Hamas forces were attacking the legitimate Palestinian security forces in a premeditated way, Haniya was talking about the calm, calling for a ceasefire. So clearly there's a division of opinion, a difference of opinion, within Hamas. I can't tell you what sort of command and control relationship there is. I'll let others explain that to you.

But we -- our opinion regarding Hamas and Hamas as a terrorist organization hasn't changed.

QUESTION: Do you think there is a chance that Haniya could quit Hamas?

MR. MCCORMACK: I have no idea.

QUESTION: Sean, what would your comment be about this story that's just moved. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas decided to declare a state of emergency. The decision is to be announced at a news conference at Abbas's headquarters at 9:00 p.m. Abbas has already informed the United States, Egypt and Jordan of his decision.

MR. MCCORMACK: Well --

QUESTION: Won't it be accurate to say that this is something that the Secretary and President Abbas spoke about on the phone?

MR. MCCORMACK: We will let President Abbas make any announcements he has to make first to the Palestinians.

QUESTION: Can you say whether you would take issue with the --

MR. MCCORMACK: I'm not going to divulge the details of a private diplomatic conversation.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Sean, you said that you had contact with the Jordanians, the Egyptians --

MR. MCCORMACK: Right.

QUESTION: -- and others. Did you have any contact with the Saudis?

MR. MCCORMACK: I can tell you that at the level of the Secretary, no. I know that we have been -- David Welch has made a number of phone calls over the past couple days. I can't tell you whether or not that includes the Saudis. But I do know that within the Arab world that they have been talking with one another. We know that the Jordanians were talking to the Saudis as well. So I can check for you. But off the top of my head, I can't tell you what phone calls David or folks out in the field have made. I can tell you the Secretary has not.

QUESTION: Why the Secretary didn't call the Saudis? It means they are less - (inaudible)?

MR. MCCORMACK: No. She's not the action officer for every phone call. She's going to obviously make phone calls that she thinks that she needs to make at a given period of time.

Yeah, Libby.

QUESTION: What is the U.S. Government's assessment of how much control Hamas has inside Gaza right now?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, let me start off by saying we don't have assets on the ground in Hamas; the State Department does not. So I can't tell you that we have eyes on anything. We rely on news reports as well as talking to our Palestinian interlocutors who are in contact with people in Gaza.

But it would seem that Hamas forces are in control of many important points within the Gaza, many important towns, many important key infrastructure points. I cannot tell you that they control all of the key infrastructure points, all the key buildings, key crossroads, key compounds. But I think that you have seen over the past couple of days the trend line that shows that they are, at the very least, largely in control of the major parts of Gaza.

Yeah.

QUESTION: And you're not concerned that this will spread to civil war -- essentially a civil war in the West Bank?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, we haven't seen the spread of violence in the West Bank and I think everybody's glad for that and everybody's pleased for that. Nobody wants to see violence. The ultimate victims of this are the Palestinian people, not only in an immediate sense of innocent civilians getting caught in a crossfire, but ultimately their dreams for a Palestinian state are diminished by these kinds of acts. That is why it is up to us as well as others in the region to support those, like President Abbas, who have an interest in achieving a Palestinian state via the negotiating table.

Yeah.

QUESTION: What kind of conversations are being had with the Palestinians and your other allies in the region about trying to help President Abbas get control of Gaza? Are there consideration of extra aid, extra support? I mean, similar to what you -- I know it's a little bit different because of the legislation, but similar to what you're doing with Prime Minister Siniora in Lebanon. I mean, here you have, as you've said, a legitimate security force that's battling terrorists.

MR. MCCORMACK: Right. I wouldn't look at the situation as quite as equivalent between Lebanon and the Gaza. But at this point, Elise, I think what we're going to need to do is take a look at where we are with the new situation in Gaza, a new balance of forces within Gaza in which Hamas and its "military wing" is in control of most of the land mass there. So I expect in the days and weeks ahead that we're going to take a look at that to see what -- how to proceed with the security assistance program, how Keith Dayton is going to continue working with the Palestinians. I believe that he has every intention and that we have every intention of his continuing his work with the Palestinians. We'll take a look to see what the balance might be between working with forces on the West Bank vice working with forces in Gaza. Right now I can't tell you what the balance might be in the future.

QUESTION: I just have a couple more. Are you considering Gaza a lost cause at this point or are you -- is the intention to try and help him? I know you're still discussing about how to do that.

MR. MCCORMACK: Right.

QUESTION: But is it your intention to try and help him get control?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, nobody's going to abandon the Palestinian people and nobody wants to abandon the hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in the Gaza Strip to the mercies of a terrorist organization and the most extreme elements of the terrorist organization. We're certainly not going to participate in this extinguishing the hopes of a whole swath of the Palestinian population to live in a Palestinian state.

Fundamentally, this comes down to a political dispute. Now, Hamas has chosen to try to short-circuit any of that debate that might have been occurring in Gaza with these violent actions. But we are -- ultimately the Palestinians are going to have to sort out for themselves the politics. We've talked for a long time about this fundamental contradiction within the Palestinian political system in which you have a group Hamas that wants to have a foot in politics and a foot in terror. Well, it's -- certainly the past few days' events have brought into high relief that choice. And it's going to be -- I think the Palestinian people are going to look to President Abbas for leadership and for a pathway out of this crisis within the Palestinian political system.

QUESTION: I just have one more.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah.

QUESTION: It's not just like Hamas going against Fatah. I mean, there is a cycle of violence between the -- among both Palestinian forces and there is documented evidence, video of forces of Fatah, which are actually in the security services going after members of Hamas that aren't necessarily only in these extra military and security forces as you were talking about, but members of the -- of Hamas -- of the Hamas government, legislators. I mean, what kind of talks are you having with President Abbas about making the distinction between -- are you considering everybody in Hamas, whether they're a legislator or anybody, a legitimate target at this point?

MR. MCCORMACK: Look; certainly, we expect the Palestinian Security Forces that report to President Abbas to adhere to professional standards of conduct, to adhere to internationally accepted standards of conduct. I can't go case by case for you, but one thing I know I'm not going to do is try to draw an equivalence between a terrorist organization and the legitimate institutions of the Palestinian Authority.

Look; if you can go by some of the reports coming out of Gaza, there are reports of the Hamas military wing using tunnels underneath some of the Palestinian Authority security force institutions to launch attacks. That didn't just happen in the past couple days. They didn't just dig the -- start digging these tunnels in the past four days. This has been something that is premeditated and planned and quite clearly meant to try to extinguish any sort of political debate within the Palestinian system about which way the Palestinian people want to go.

And I can assure you that we are going to stand with those who want to negotiate the basis for a Palestinian state. That certainly is not Hamas at this time. They have consistently rejected the international principles that they -- that the international system has asked them to adhere to in order to have a different kind of situation in the Palestinian areas and they refuse to do so, but -- so we're going to continue to work and try to strengthen those moderate Palestinian forces that seek peace in the region.

Yeah, Sylvie.

QUESTION: Ban Ki-moon today spoke about the possibility of sending an international force in the Gaza Strip.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah.

QUESTION: Do you think it would be politically a good idea and military feasible?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, we'll, of course -- yeah, we'll, of course, take a look at whatever the Secretary General has to propose. And I have to confess I haven't seen any details of such a proposal. But I would, just as an initial reaction, put out for you that I think it would be difficult to find forces that would be ready and effective in going into such a clearly non-permissive environment.

Yeah, Libby.

QUESTION: Just more broadly, Sean, given the trend line in Gaza in the last few days, doesn't this represent a severe setback to any efforts Secretary Rice has made to bring a solution to this?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, what it is -- it's a challenge to the Palestinian political system. And I think what it does is underscore the importance of working with those moderate forces in the Palestinian political system that have an interest in a peaceful negotiation; that have a vision for the Palestinian people that is based on greater freedoms, greater democracy, greater prosperity and a Palestinian state.

That -- the importance of that and the importance of that mission is in no way diminished by these actions. In fact, I think it only underscores the importance of continuing to try to move forward on that track, and to not let those who have made a conscious choice to use violence and to use terror to undermine the aspirations of the Palestinian people to allow them to succeed.

Kirit.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) off of Libby's question, does the recent violence give the Secretary any pause to reconsider any plans she may have to visit the region? And then second, you had mentioned earlier this morning that the Secretary had spoken with the Jordanians and the Egyptians to urge them to try to help Mahmoud Abbas. Could you tell us what she'd like to see them do to help support Abbas?

MR. MCCORMACK: Right, a couple things. One, in terms of travel plans, no changes at this point. We'll keep you up-to-date. Yesterday she did speak with Egyptian Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit and they talked about ways in which the Egyptian Government might augment their security forces along that strip of land in Egypt that abuts the Gaza Strip. She encouraged the Egyptian Government to support President Abbas in his efforts in any way that they can politically, diplomatically.

She did not speak with the Jordanians directly, it was our Ambassador went in and spoke with the Jordanian Government and it was basically the same message, absent that augmentation of the security forces along Gaza. But it was just a general message of talking to them about ways in which they might support President Abbas, moderate Palestinian political forces as well as to work within the Arab world to generate this similar kind of support.

Yes, sir.

QUESTION: Sean, do you have a comment on the death of Kurt Waldheim, who was the former U.S. Secretary General and was on your watch list?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, we'll come back to it.

Yeah.

QUESTION: I just wanted to ask, have you had time to look sort of more closely at the report the UN leaked so-called secret report? I specifically wanted to ask, though, there was a reference to something that Elliott Abrams reportedly or allegedly had said in -- sort of a threat to withhold UN -- U.S. funds to the UN unless the UN agrees to not talk to Hamas.

MR. MCCORMACK: It's a UN report and I understand it expresses the views of an individual, a former envoy, and you can talk to him about his views and you can talk to the UN about whether or not those views expressed in that report represent the views as -- of the UN as a body.

QUESTION: Did you threaten to hold up funding for the UN if it --

MR. MCCORMACK: You can talk to the UN about their report.

Yeah, sure.

QUESTION: What's Dayton doing right now? What's -- and I have a follow-up to that as well. What's -- where is he, what's going on with --

MR. MCCORMACK: He's in the region and I'm sure he is closely following the situation in contact with his Palestinian interlocutors, feeding back information about the situation on the ground. And I'm sure that the Secretary, as well as others, are going to be looking to him as we get a clearer picture of the ramifications of what Hamas has done, as to what sort of assistance we might provide to those legitimate Palestinian institutions that report to President Abbas. Beyond that, I can't really speak to his activities.

QUESTION: But if I'm not wrong, for the -- in recent -- you know, in the last four weeks, there was that proposal for a U.S. -- the U.S. proposal for benchmarks that the Israelis should have to meet and Olmert just came out and said, "Oh, we -- you know, we can't do this," and it seemed to die. I mean, is -- and then there was the request by Fatah to get ammunition in and -- I mean, the Israelis and the U.S. were looking at that and then we didn't hear anything more about that. I mean, did both of those proposals just fade away or are they still in play? I mean --

MR. MCCORMACK: No. In terms -- the benchmarks are just meant to put down on a piece of paper some practical political targets for the Palestinians and the Israelis to work on. Deals with practical issues like checkpoints and those sort of issues. So no, that is still active, that is still --

QUESTION: You're still trying to get the Israelis to accept them?

MR. MCCORMACK: We're still working with both sides. Look, I'm sure that if -- these were our thoughts and ideas. I'm sure that the Palestinians and the Israelis are going to have suggestions concerning the document. It's not something that is written in stone. It's meant to be a cooperative exercise and it's not meant to impose anything on either side. It's meant as a useful tool around which -- you know, with which they can have a conversation, you know, some practical things that they might focus on.

In terms of assistance to the Palestinian security forces, because of congressional notifications and reprogramming, that was actually a program that was just really getting off the ground as Hamas launched this attack. And our assistance to the security forces really centered around training and non-lethal assistance, things like communications and uniforms and that sort of thing.

QUESTION: Sean, can you just -- in the last 48 hours, who has the Secretary spoken to other than -- you said the Egyptian Foreign Minister yesterday and then Abbas today?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, in terms of -- she's spoken with Foreign Minister Aboul Gheit on Wednesday. She spoke to Omar Suleiman, the Egyptian intelligence head, on Tuesday. She spoke with President Abbas today. She spoke to Israeli President Shimon Peres to congratulate him on his election to the presidency. And --

QUESTION: Today?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yes, today. And on Monday, she spoke with Foreign Minister Livni.

Yeah, Nina.

QUESTION: Sean, the Arab foreign ministers are holding emergency talks tomorrow. Will there be a U.S. representative there or will the Secretary speak with any of her counterparts after the meeting?

MR. MCCORMACK: I can't tell you whether or not she's going to speak with her counterparts, but we are in contact with the key players that are going to be attending that meeting. I'm not sure if we're going to have an observer there or not, but we'll get a readout of the meeting. And obviously, the results of the meeting will be out there for all to see.

QUESTION: Are you relying primarily on the Egyptians to try and broker some kind of --

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, I think we're -- everybody's looking to some of the leading states in the region that have played an active role on this issue. That includes the Egyptians, the Jordanians and the Saudis as well as others. But I think people in the region look primarily to those three states to take a lead.

Yeah, Farah.

QUESTION: I mean, it seems as though U.S. policy in this conflict for the -- over a year has been to encourage the moderates to confront the extremists, to encourage Abbas to confront Hamas. Isn't that whole strategy based on the wishful thinking that Abbas would actually win?

MR. MCCORMACK: No, the strategy is to help build up functioning, effective, legitimate institutions of a future Palestinian state. That's the strategy and that goes back to the President's Rose Garden speech in 2002. And that's been the focus of our efforts. And it was harder to accomplish in some areas than others. There was great progress that has been made, actually, in regularizing and bringing up to an international standard Palestinian finances. They were a mess in the wake of the rule of Yasser Arafat. This was a system of multiple bank accounts, hidden accounts, cutouts, people being paid in brown paper envelopes. And it was all designed to keep Yasser -- you know, to benefit Yasser Arafat and to benefit those around him. And that's a system that Salam Fayyad and President Abbas got a hold of and have made great strides in improving to the point now where the international system trusts their dealings with them.

Now the Palestinian Security Forces were an equal -- in an equal state of disarray; again, the same kind of -- the same kind of fractured, unclear chain-of-command again all designed to keep Yasser Arafat in control. So the object was to help build up those security forces, make them more professional, have clear chains of command, and make them more capable, and make them -- in every case, the idea was to have these institutions serve the needs of the Palestinian people, whether that's in finances or in security.

Now in security, it took longer and it has taken longer. And I would suggest to you that the timing of this Hamas strike against these institutions isn't a coincidence, just as the training and equipping program for these security forces that report to President Abbas is really starting in earnest, really starting to get going. That's when they attack. They attack just as the Egyptian Government is making efforts to try to bridge differences within the Palestinian political system. They attack just as the Qassam rocket attacks have been reduced -- not ended, but reduced. So it's a clear attempt by these forces of violent extremism to short-circuit the debate within the Palestinian political system about which direction the Palestinian people are going.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) I mean, forgive me --

MR. MCCORMACK: No --

QUESTION: But it seems as though so much of what you're saying is -- it doesn't jive with the reality on the ground of what's happening and -- you know, you're talking about building the Palestinian institutions and everything we're hearing out of Gaza is about the collapse.

MR. MCCORMACK: Look, you know, every single day, members of Hamas, members of the Hamas military get up and they know what they want to do. They want to work actively to try to subvert any progress to a political reconciliation of the State of Israel. They want to work to subvert any attempt to bring a functioning, legitimate democracy to the Palestinian people. We know that. That is what the Palestinian people are up against, that is what we are all up against, those of us who have an interest in bringing peace to the region.

Is that difficult? Absolutely. And is it made -- has it been made more difficult by the fact that the Palestinian leadership, prior to President Abbas, was thoroughly corrupt and thoroughly authoritarian? Yes, it is. But that does not mean -- just because we have these challenges does not mean that you give up on the Palestinian people. That is not what President Bush, that is not what Secretary Rice is going to do.

So are the forces of violent extremism going to fight back, are they going to punch back against attempts to bring greater freedom, greater democracy, greater prosperity not only to the Palestinian people, but to peoples throughout the Middle East? You bet they are and we're seeing that. But that -- does that mean that we are going to fight any less hard? Absolutely not. Does that mean we're going to give up? No. Does that mean that we are going to sacrifice those people in the region who are forces for moderation, who are forces for political dialogue, who are forces for peace? Absolutely not.

That is precisely the wrong time to do that and that is why Secretary Rice is making -- is going to make it very clear that we continue to support those forces of moderation and those who want to bring peace to the region.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Well, I was going to ask some questions, but you seem to have asked and answered all of them yourself. Can we change -- move on or do you want to do Waldheim first?

MR. MCCORMACK: Whoever wants to go next.

QUESTION: Let the guy -- do Waldheim.

(Laughter.)

QUESTION: Please.

MR. MCCORMACK: There you are. Certainly, I think that our hearts go out to those members of his family who miss his passing.

QUESTION: Any other comment on that?

MR. MCCORMACK: No.

Yeah.

QUESTION: Do you have any reaction at all to the Supreme Court decision today in the India-Mongolian case which could prove to be quite an expensive proposition if it's reciprocated --

MR. MCCORMACK: I noticed that and, you know, I have put that question to our lawyers, and they have yet to produce an answer for me. So as soon as the lawyers come up with an answer, I'll get it to you guys.

QUESTION: Okay. Could you? Because I do need an answer for that --

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah -- no, absolutely --

QUESTION: I mean, I don't know where you'd go from here, it seems like that's the court of last appeal.

MR. MCCORMACK: (Inaudible) they have spoken, so we'll have to get you an answer. I don't know when it will be.

QUESTION: Can -- also, I don't know who would the right -- but, I mean, the potential cost to the U.S. Government, if this is reciprocated by other governments abroad, would be an interesting thing to know as well.

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah, I'm not sure that would be known immediately, but --

QUESTION: Well, millions? Hundreds of millions?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, we'll try to get you an answer, Matt, yeah. We'll try to be as precise as we can. I can't promise that, you know, in the day after such a decision that we'll have a full answer, but we'll try to get you something as soon as we can, yeah.

Okay, yes.

QUESTION: Can we move on to North Korea?

MR. MCCORMACK: Okay. Beat you to the punch.

QUESTION: Where on earth are we now?

MR. MCCORMACK: (Laughter.) Where on earth are we now? Well, there are electrons buzzing around the world. I think that for a precise and complete update, you're going to have to get it from the parties most directly involved in this -- the Macanese authorities, Chinese authorities, the North Korean authorities. The Treasury Department has spoken in the past about our working with the Russian Government, and certainly we are appreciative of the efforts of the Russian Government in this matter. But at this point, I can't really offer you any more details.

I can say as a general statement that we all look forward to BDA being behind us so we can get back to the real business of the six-party talks. And should these transactions be completed, that we would hope the North Korean Government would live up to its obligations under the February 13th agreement. They have periodically during this period of time, both in public and private, told us that they intend to meet those obligations. So we would hope that they do.

QUESTION: Well, there have been signs that they've effectively loosened up. Chris Hill is in the region. You said he's meeting with his counterparts.

MR. MCCORMACK: Right.

QUESTION: Can you give us some dates and times and --

MR. MCCORMACK: I can. I have that information here. He's going to be in Mongolia over the weekend to talk about -- to participate in Asia Society's 35th Williamsburg conference on "Changing Asia, Changing World" that will go from June 15th to the 18th. And he is scheduled to visit Beijing June 18th; Seoul June 18th to 19th; and Tokyo June 19th and 20th. And he's going to talk about bilateral issues, but I think the conversations will be dominated about -- dominated by issues related to the six-party talks and how to move forward.

QUESTION: Will he be begging the Mongolian Government not to charge the United States Government tax -- property tax?

MR. MCCORMACK: That's a -- that's a good point. We're going to have to get this to you -- get to Chris. It may complicate his trip a bit. (Laughter.)

Yeah.

QUESTION: Sean, the Macanese authorities have now said publicly that 20 million of the money has actually been transferred out of Macau. Reports say by the Federal Reserve Bank in New York to the Russian bank. You can't confirm even that?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, you already have the Macanese authorities, one of the parties that have directed --

QUESTION: Yes, yes. Since there was an American institution involved in that --

MR. MCCORMACK: I'll look --

QUESTION: -- we would appreciate this information from you.

MR. MCCORMACK: Sure. I'll let the Federal Reserve, an independent institution of the U.S. Government, speak for itself.

Yes.

QUESTION: Is it fair to say now that you're back on track to implementing the February 13th agreement or is that a bit premature to --

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, let's see. We'll see what the coming days bring.

Yeah.

QUESTION: To bolster defense against PKK infiltration, Turkey's considering the creation of a buffer zone on the border with Iraq, extending a few miles into Iraqi territory. Have the Turks been discussing this with you? Have you discussed anything like this with the Iraqis or is this a good or bad idea?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, let me -- on the first, I can't tell you. I'm just not up to speed on any detailed conversations we have with them. But I can tell you that we don't think any -- such an incursion into Iraq by Turkish forces is a good idea. The -- clearly the Iraqis have responsibilities, they have responsibilities to fight terrorism. And the Turkish Government has responsibilities also to be a good neighbor. We understand the losses that the Turkish people have suffered as a result of terrorist acts by the PKK.

QUESTION: Have you considered a buffer zone -- creation of a small buffer zone just a few miles into Iraq? Would it be an incursion?

MR. MCCORMACK: I'm not sure that that is an idea that we would support.

Yeah, Nina.

QUESTION: One last question on Iraq, the motor attack in the Green Zone. How close was Negroponte to that area? He was in a nearby building apparently to the al-Rashid Hotel.

MR. MCCORMACK: I don't know -- can't tell you.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR. MCCORMACK: All right, okay.

(The briefing was concluded at 2:18 p.m.)

DPB # 107

Released on June 14, 2007

© Scoop Media