Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

An Audit Proposal that is Simpler but Effective

A New Election Audit Proposal that is Simpler but Effective

Hello Everyone,

Since it seems to be too complex and not politically viable to require individual calculations of the audit amount for each race, here is a proposal for election audits for auditing 20%, 10%, or 2% of vote counts based on the margins between candidates:

Here is what I suggest:

Margin | Audit Rate | Minimum # of Counts Audited
0 to 1% | 20% | 80 or 100% of vote counts whichever is smallest

Margin | Audit Rate | Minimum # of Counts Audited
1+% to 5% | 10% | 40 or 100% of vote counts whichever is smallest

Margin | Audit Rate | Minimum # of Counts Audited
5+% to 100% | 2% | 8 or 100% of vote counts whichever is smallest


**********

The minimum audit amounts are very important to keep the probability for detection high in smaller races and smaller jurisdictions with fewer total counts, where the recommended audit percentages of 20%, 10%, and 2% might not otherwise result in a large enough sample size to ensure detecting outcome-altering vote miscount.

Here is a link to our easy-to-use spreadsheet to check the probabilities of using the above suggested audit rates and minimum amounts.

http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/paper-audits/HowManyToAudit.xls

Kathy Dopp
http://electionarchive.org
National Election Data Archive Dedicated to Accurately Counting Elections

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
World Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.