'Consult The People' Fiji Times
Fiji Times Tells Administration 'Consult The People'
SUVA:
The Fiji Times, the country's largest and most influential
daily
newspaper, today warned the military-backed interim
administration to
remove "national ignorance" and consult
the people before adopting a new
constitution.
It said
the nation had now seen the consequences of national
ignorance
over constitutional rights through coups twice
in 13 years.
Interim Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase's
administration must ensure that
first everyone understood
the 1997 constitution which had been abrogated
during the
May insurrection, said the Fiji Times.
"It must then
establish whether the people - the majority - want
the
constitution removed," said the paper.
"The best way to establish this is by referendum.
"A parallel
referendum could be held to determine what the
indigenous
people want.
"This will put an end once and for all to their use as a political tool.
"Once Mr Qarase
is sure of what the people want he can move on
the
constitution. Not before."
In a submission to an
African Caribbean Pacific fact-finding mission in
Fiji
this week, Qarase claimed the reinstatement of the 1997
multiracial
constitution and the appointment of a
"government of natonal unity"
from MPs elected in the
ousted Parliament would not be acceptable to the
majority
of indigenous Fijians.
He also outlined plans to select a
constitution review commission which
would draft and
submit guidelines.
Qarase said the new constitution should
be ready by 2001 and elections
could be held a year
later.
The Fiji Times warned of the consequences of
failing to consult the
people.
Although the 1997
constitution was adopted after wide-ranging
consultation
and consensus support from Parliament and the Great
Council
of Chiefs, there was no referendum consulting the
people.
"The formulation of a new constitution is a
painstaking task," said the
paper in its editorial.
"It is as difficult and time-consuming as it is expensive.
"With more than 6000 out of work and the civil
service taking a 12.5 per
cent salary cut, there can be
little justification on spending
much-needed money on the
review of a document which is barely four
years
old.
"The events of the last 30 years have shown
that there has been very
little wrong with the supreme
laws of the land.
"Divisions blamed on the constitution
have been based largely on
ignorance.
"Few would
disagree that there is very little understanding among
the
common people - and even the so-called education
classes - on the 1997
constitution.
"There are flaws -
peceived and genuine - in this document and that is
to be
accepted.
"No constitution in any country will ever be flawless.
Ends