VZCZCXRO1744
OO RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLN
RUEHLZ RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHKV #1627/01 2281404
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 151404Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY KYIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6228
INFO RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI PRIORITY 0072
RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHXD/MOSCOW POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 KYIV 001627
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PBTS PINR PINS PNAT PREL PGOV KPAI GG UK
SUBJECT: TFGG01 Ukrainian Media on Georgian Conflict
1. (SBU) Summary: Ukrainian media is split on its covera...
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 KYIV 001627 SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PBTS PINR PINS PNAT PREL PGOV KPAI GG UK
SUBJECT: TFGG01 Ukrainian Media on Georgian Conflict 1. (SBU)
Summary: Ukrainian media is split on its coverage of the conflict in Georgia, which occupied the front page of Ukrainian
newspapers this week and featured prominently on broadcast and on-line media. Pro-Western and pro-presidential
periodicals denounced Russia's support for separatist regions in Georgia and accused Russia of imperialism and
indiscriminate use of force. Papers leaning toward the opposition as well as those associated with Prime Minister
Tymoshenko claimed the conflict was provoked by Georgia and focused on the suffering of South Ossetia's population. Not
surprisingly, the two camps drew different lessons for Ukraine: one urged rapid NATO membership, while the other called
for neutrality and warned against provoking Russia. Additionally, some media was critical about the absence of a public
statement by the Prime Minister. (Note: While Ukrainian print media and television have been relatively balanced in
their reporting, many Ukrainians have access to Russian television stations, which present a very different picture.) 2.
(SBU) Print Media -------------------- Pro-Western Den's senior international correspondent Mykola Siruk stated in an
article August 13 that Moscow wants "full control over Georgia." He called Russia "hypocritical" for blaming "Georgian
aggression" as the cause of the conflict and rejected Russia's characterization of its actions as "peacekeeping."
Another Den journalist, Yurii Raikhel, compared Russia's policy regarding South Ossetia to Hitler's invasion of
Czechoslovakia in 1938 under the pretext of defending Sudeten Germans (August 12). In an article August 14, Raikhel
ridiculed Russia for trying to pin the term "aggressor" on Georgia. He commented on the outcome of hostilities, stating
that Russia had lost politically, diplomatically, financially and militarily (claiming that Russia's military was
inefficient). 3. (SBU) Deputy chief editor of the pro-Yushchenko Ukraina Moloda Dmytro Lykhovii, in an opinion piece
headlined "The Russia That I Hate" (August 12), wrote: "The Russian bear opened a new page on military 'victories':
tanks on foreign territory, the bombing of sovereign Georgia, the killing of hundreds of Georgian citizens, and a
massive propaganda attack based on the most brutal lies -- this is what Russia's first war in the third millennium looks
like." He concludes that "Caucasus developments are additional proof of how vital it is for Ukraine to join NATO." 4.
(SBU) These opinions are seconded by the Russian-language "Gazeta po-Kievski" (August 14) which sees the ceasefire as a
Russian defeat, urges a fast decision by NATO on Ukraine's and Georgia's Membership Action Plans and hails the unity of
and "victory in the stand-off with Russia" by Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, whose leaders rallied in
Tbilisi in solidarity with Georgia. Both Gazeta po-Kievski (August 13) and Ukraina Moloda, as well as Hazeta24 (August
14), lashed out against Prime Minister Tymoshenko for her failure to denounce Russian aggression against Georgia. 5.
(SBU) Some newspapers that supported Georgia and criticized Russia nevertheless published opinion pieces running counter
to the general editorial line. For example, Hazeta24 (August 13) prints opinions by European experts, who despite
pressure from the journalist, refused to hold Russia solely responsible for the hostilities. Arkady Moshes of the
Finnish Institute of International Relations opined that "based on the precedent of air strikes against Serbia that
ultimately led to Kosovo independence, it is very easy for Russia to argue it is acting in the same manner in
Georgia...In any case, people will take a look at who fired the first shot. In this case the first shot was not from the
Russian side. And this fact is impossible to conceal." Alexander Rahr, a member of the German Council on Foreign Policy,
said that, unlike in the U.S., in Europe many view with understanding the Russian move to go into South Ossetia to stop
the bloodshed. 6. (SBU) Den, August 14, put on the front page an opinion piece by Ihor Slisarenko who, while blaming
Russia for masterminding the conflict, stated that "Russia not only scored a regional military and political victory,
but also forced the West to take into account its own 'Monroe doctrine'." Gazeta po-Kievski, in the same article that
accused Russia of imperialism, expressed hope that the war in Georgia would "force world leaders to review the rules of
the game in contemporary world. Because, if the U.S. can do anything it pleases in Iraq, if today Europe recognizes
Kosovo's independence, then these geopolitical players will have followers." 7. (SBU) Segodnya daily, owned by one of
the leaders of the Regions Party, Rinat Akhmetov, in several articles published August 12-14, urged Ukraine to keep
clear of any involvement in the Georgian KYIV 00001627 002 OF 003 conflict, warning that involvement would split
Ukraine. An opinion column by anti-Western commentator Oles Buzyna (August 12) blamed the U.S. for the actions of
Georgian President Saakashvili that provoked the war. Vechernie Vesti, associated with Prime Minister Tymoshenko,
carried a large article (August 13) surprisingly critical of President Saakashvili and of pro-Americanism of the part of
Ukrainian leadership: "The war in the Caucasus sent shivers down the spine not only because of compassion with the
civilian population of Georgia and Ossetia. The open games of Bankova with the White House, the eloquent threats by the
Ukrainian MFA to prevent the Russian Black Sea Navy's ships from returning to Crimea after patrolling the
Russian-Georgian border, have given rise to fear among our citizens of deliberate or inadvertent involvement of our
country in war. Controversial actions by Ukrainian politicians who talk about a peaceful settlement of the Caucasus
conflict in fact only aggravate the already tense relations with Russia and encourage American policies... One is really
scared when one realizes where, God forbid, Ukraine's foreign policy could lead us with its desire to get into NATO at
any cost." 8. (SBU) Kievskie Vedomosti, in an essay by Yevgenii Yakunov (August 13), painted an unattractive portrait of
Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, ascribed to the Georgian people an intrinsic characteristic of producing
unbalanced passionate leaders, and warned Ukraine of the danger of "becoming cannon fodder in someone else's war."
Broadcast Media --------------- 9. (SBU) Ukrainian primetime TV coverage of the Georgian conflict has been mostly
straightforward and balanced, covering a wide range of viewpoints (ranging from Russia saying early in the conflict that
Ukraine has no moral grounds to mediate in the South Ossetian conflict to the U.S. President Bush statement of strong
support for Georgia). In addition to factual reporting, primetime comments included those by Leonid Kravchuk, Ukraine's
first President, saying to television's One Plus One on August 10 that "a game by superpowers is taking place in the
Caucasus, and the game intends to push Russia aside from the position it used to hold there before. Russia is not going
to give in, whereas the United States and western countries will try to push Russia aside. So, leaders of the Caucasus
should take this into consideration, particularly Saakashvili..." 10. (SBU) Anatoly Grytsenko, chair of the
Parliamentary Committee on Defense and National Security, and ex-Defense Minister, said on Channel Five (August 13), "To
make an assessment of what has happened one has to distance oneself from the principle 'friend or foe' or 'aggressor and
victim.' I am in solidarity with the people of Georgia, who became the victims of war. However, I'd like to say that I
can't be in solidarity with the actions by President Saakashvili, who resorted to the use of force to resolve the
conflict. It's true he has been provoked. But a statement and state policy are about remaining cool. He resorted to the
use of force and ended with a tragic result for the country. One may say absolutely that these two republics (South
Ossetia, Abkhazia) will never return to the jurisdiction of this country (Georgia) whatever active measures the
international community, including Ukraine, tries to use. Also I'd like to add that the use of rocket launchers is not
acceptable in the third millennium, and such actions should be punished... On the other hand, Russia has resorted to an
act of war, an act of aggression. It has attacked Georgia from all three spheres: land, water, and air, and it is war,
it is the violation of the international war. It should be condemned, and I regret that so far our leadership has failed
to call it aggression." On-Line Media ------------- 11. (SBU) UNIAN carried an article titled "Caucasian Crisis: Lessons
for Ukraine" written by Yengen Magda (August 11). The author argues that this crisis is not simply a conflict between
Russia and Georgia, but could result in a serious change in the European map and Ukraine should prepare for this. Magda
suggests that Kyiv should check how many Crimeans have Russian passports. Magna also states that the conflict is
Russia's response to Kosovo's independence, that Kyiv cannot effectively influence the situation in Georgia because of
future gas negotiations with Russia, and that Georgia now will try to receive guarantees to join NATO quickly. Further,
Magda says that the conflict may help Ukraine join NATO and that recent events have proved that Ukraine needs a mobile
and effective army. This, he says, could result in change of the Minister of Defense, as Yekhanurov is not a
professional military man. Finally, Magda stresses that Ukraine should revise its policy in Crimea.
http://unian.net/ukr/news/news-266586.html KYIV 00001627 003 OF 003 12. (SBU) In Obozrevatel ("How We Can Prevent War
with Russia?" August 13), Dmitriy Bielianskiy argues that Russia's goal is not to occupy Georgia but to get rid of
Saakashvili and that nobody can really prevent Russia from doing it: neither NATO, nor the USA, UN, EU, G7 could do
anything except issue statements. The author writes that Ukraine is not a united country and this could result in the
same situation as in Georgia. The main question now, in the author's opinion, is how to prevent war with Russia. He
proposes two ways: further promote NATO in Ukraine as the only way to protect Ukraine's sovereignty or a second approach
(a paradoxical one, according to the author) would be to refuse to join NATO and to accept the Russian language as a
second official language. http://www.obozrevatel.com/news/2008/8/13/253 456.htm 13. (SBU) Ukrains'ka Pravda carried an
analytical piece entitled, "Ukraine Is Next?" by Oleksandr Sushko, Scientific Director of the Institute of Euro Atlantic
Co-operation. The author argues that this is a Russian war for a new world order and if Russia wins this war there won't
be a place for Ukraine as a sovereign country. The author points out the weaknesses of the West, saying there are no
leaders any more like Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher who would call things by their names. The author expresses the
same sentiment as in the above-mentioned article, namely that in order to prevent war, Ukraine has two choices: join
NATO as soon as possible or join Russia. http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2008/8/12/79803 .htm 14. (SBU) In "Russia against
Georgia: Revival of the Empire," the author claims that the main goals of Russia are to prevent Georgia from joining
NATO and to prevent the creation of "non-Russian" means to transport energy. According to the author, the war in Georgia
makes it impossible for Georgia to receive a Membership Action Plan. The author writes about ways to protect Ukraine
from the same situation: to join NATO, to remove the Russian Black Sea fleet, to coordinate information space, and to
control the situation in Crimea. http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2008/8/12/79832 .htm PETTIT