What will become of humans when thinking machines outthink us at every turn? That's about to be the new human condition.
As a reviewer of the book, "Seven Games" (checkers, chess, Go, backgammon, poker, Scrabble and bridge) quips:
"Every game has its history, its champions, its quirks and its community, and then comes the programmer who believes he
can teach a computer to play it. Each time, devotees of the game stake their claim that their pastime is a pure
expression of ineluctable human creativity, and then, as the programs improve, the players are stripped of their
That’s true in a much larger sense, and we know what's coming, though few seem to be disturbed by it. The traditional
games of the West and East are the least of it. What people have long taken to be "pure expressions of ineluctable human
creativity," from medicine to technological innovation and even art, threaten to 'augment' humans into second-rate
Artificial Intelligence, like 'higher thought' itself, is based on memory, logic and speed. If it hasn't already, AI
will soon surpass human smarts as our thinking machines exceed our cognitive abilities. To my mind, that means there's
no choice but to transcend thought.
The Cognitive Revolution that ushered in 'fully modern humans' about a hundred thousand years ago has reached its
logical end with AI. Will it mark the gradual end of the human mind, or the true beginning of the human being?
The reviewer doesn't realize the implications of his insight: "By the time computers defeated human champions at chess,
then poker, then backgammon and Go, the human players had not so much stopped resisting the inevitable as submitted to
It isn't just that "the games we thought were an art are just another mechanism, no more inaccessible to the brute
strength of microprocessors than, say, assembling an automobile." For millennia at the core psychological level, humans
have seen ourselves as creatures of higher thought; now we're building thought machines that have higher thought than
Now that computers are becoming smarter than us, even more 'creative,' they threaten to make the human mind redundant,
if not obsolete.
"You begin to realize that people aren't playing one another with the help of computers; the computers are playing
against other computers, using humans as fleshy armatures to move the pieces."
"We now know that when we play [or work, or think], we are not unique beings with a divine spark of genius but merely
models in an obsolete generation of thinking machines."
Therefore it's become existentially imperative that human beings go beyond thought. But what does it mean to transcend
thought, and can it actually be achieved, except by a few illumined people?
For the tens of thousands of years, since the emergence of 'modern man,' humans have been creatures of memory, dominated
by collective psychological memory, which is called tradition.
On one hand psychological memory has been is the basis of the self, tradition, ritual and culture. On the other thought,
which is inherently a separative mechanism, has allowed us to build everything in the world. But symbolic thought has
also been the source of tribalism and nationalism, of personal and collective greed and grudges giving rise to hatred
Civilization has steadily eroded the ancient, indigenous and traditional richness of memory. In the digital age, that
erosion has reached exponential proportions. With the loss of the intactness of cultural and generational memory, selves
and groups have become increasingly fragmented, superficial and disordered. And the more people try to revert and cling
to their tribal, sectarian and traditional identities as separate groups, the more denuded and conflicted man becomes.
The current fad of valuing indigenous modes of being in a world that is literally cutting the land, trees and animals
out from under the few intact native peoples that remain in wilderness, attests to how rudderless we've become as a
species in the digital age.
Traditions no longer hold water, and memory has become redundant in the digital age, which makes psychological memory
increasingly dysfunctional and destructive.
Looking toward the future, what essentially distinguishes the human being from the thinking machines that humans have
created in our own image?
The mind/brain of the human being, unlike that of all thinking machines (however advanced AI becomes) has the capacity
to attend to itself, awaken spontaneous stillness, and self-knowingly delete unwanted memories by attending to them.
To AI, a quiet mind is a ludicrous proposition, attained only when the machine is unplugged from a power source. No
so-called intelligent machine, however much techies try to imbue it with sentience, will ever be able to attend and
transcend memory. But to a human being, a quiet mind is essential to being human.
Stillness of mind is always a spontaneous phenomenon, never the result of effort, goal or idea. Stillness happens when
the flame of attention burns strongly enough to incinerate every thought and emotion as they arise.
The flame of attention grows fierce within us when we don't seek stillness as a goal or idea, but simply, passively
watch every sensation, thought and feeling as they occur in the present, without evaluation or preconception.
Though family and society condition us to believe that living is a matter of accumulating memories, it's actually just
the opposite. As one gets older, memories calcify in the brain and suffocate the heart.
The human race stands at a juncture. We have to redefine what it means to be a human being, or AI and VR will destroy
our capacity for spiritual and intellectual insight as human beings.