Hazards In Homes and Gardens a Major Injury Cost
Tuesday 30 April
2013
Hazards In Homes and Gardens
a Major Injury Cost
A significant
proportion of injuries in the home, costing millions of
dollars a year, are related to how a house is built and
maintained, according to new research from the University of
Otago, Wellington.
This latest study in home injury
prevention investigated 1328 home injuries reported to ACC
involving 1612 people between 2006 and 2009. It also looked
at commonly occurring potential injury hazards in the home
that could be repaired at modest cost.
Trained inspectors
revealed a range of potential injury hazards in many homes
including the lack of working smoke detectors (65%),
incompletely fenced driveways (55%), hot water temperatures
at over 60 degrees (49%) and poorly lit access to the house
(34%).
“We found that important structural
hazards can be fixed relatively cheaply at an average of
about $600 per household. The findings of this study and
previous research we’ve done in this area indicate that
this expenditure is justified in terms of increased
safety,” says lead author Dr Michael
Keall.
“Home hazards impose a considerable cost
in terms of injuries, with the overall social cost
considerably higher than the total cost to the country of
road injuries.”
Keall says a previous University
of Otago, Wellington, study showed that the total social
cost of deaths and injuries in the home cost three and half
times as much as road injuries; that is $13 billion compared
to nearly $4 billion for road injuries. In 2007, 17,598
people were admitted to hospital as a consequence of home
injury, along with another 649,000 minor injuries which had
to be medically treated.
This new study has found
that 38% of injuries are related to a structural aspect of
the home environment, both inside the house and outside in
the garden.
“We’ve designed a protocol for
identifying and repairing these and other structural hazards
and the effect of this protocol is being examined at present
by a major Health Research Council-funded trial to determine
which hazards would be best to fix for the most benefit in
terms of reduced injuries and cost to ACC, the health
sector, and society more generally.”
The
locations for the injury and other issues were determined by
in-depth phone interviews. This analysis showed that outdoor
areas of the home are important for injuries as 37% of
events happen outside, on access paths, steps and in the
garden.
Particularly vulnerable groups for home
injury are the very young (under 5) and people over the age
of 80. But the home is where New Zealanders spend most of
their lives, so it is an important setting for injury for
all age groups.
“One of the more interesting
aspects is that people who are injured tend to blame
themselves rather than look at hazards around the home that
may have played a role, which can often be easily fixed.
However, when these hazards are identified by trained
inspectors, householders may be able to make use of this
information to improve the safety of their homes,” Keall
says.
Dr Keall says this latest study is another
important step in the process of clarifying exactly what
areas of the home should be made safer to reduce injuries,
which are costing the country billions of dollars a
year.
This study has been funded by the Health
Research Council and ACC, and published in the international
journal Accident Analysis and
Prevention.
ENDS