Scientists occupy Wall Street Journal
A group of expert climate researchers has rounded robustly on 16 scientists who complained in the Wall Street Journal (No Need to Panic About Global Warming) that presidential candidates should understand that the statement that "nearly all scientists demand that something
dramatic be done to stop global warming" is not true.
The initial complaint used Auckland academic Dr Chris de Freitas, the editor of the journal Climate Research - and a
vocal critic of some aspects of climate change science - as a poster boy for its argument that "many young scientists
furtively say that while they also have serious doubts about the global-warming message, they are afraid to speak up for
fear of not being promoted-or worse".
It said that when Dr de Freitas published a peer-reviewed article in 2003 "with the politically incorrect (but factually
correct) conclusion that the recent warming is not unusual in the context of climate changes over the past thousand
years" members of a "warming establishment" mounted a determined - though unsuccessful - campaign to have him removed
from his editorial job and fired from his university position. The op-ed page piece also re-visited "Climategate"
allegations against another New Zealander, Dr Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the climate analysis section of the
US National Center for Atmospheric Research.
But a sharply-worded response has now been published in the WSJ - signed by Dr Trenberth and over 30 other scientists from Australia, Canada, Britain, France and the USA - and
referred to the group of 16 as the "climate-science equivalent of dentists practicing cardiology".
"Most of these authors have no expertise in climate science," it said. "The few authors who have such expertise are
known to have extreme views that are out of step with nearly every other climate expert". Observations showed
unequivocally that the planet was getting hotter, and computer models had shown that during periods when there was a
smaller increase of surface temperatures, "warming is occurring elsewhere in the climate system, typically in the deep
ocean". It pointed out that a quote attributed to Dr Trenberth was used out-of-context and misrepresented .
The row has been picked up on science news websites, including the SMC, and Discovery.com, where the headline read: Climate Scientists Occupy Wall Street Journal, and in mainstream media such as London's Guardian and the New York Times.
ENDS