The New Zealand Government’s announced continuation of its anti-nuclear policy, which will ban any future Australian
nuclear submarines from entering New Zealand waters or ports, has been welcomed by long term peace activists, the
International Affairs and Disarmament Committee of the Aotearoa /New Zealand Peace Foundation.
New Zealand’s world-leading Nuclear Free legislation was hard fought for by Peace Squadron sailors confronting nuclear
warships, grass roots activists and the David Lange government, says Richard Northey,chair of the Peace Foundation’s
International Affairs and Disarmament committee.
“I personally sailed in front of the nuclear submarine Haddo and then, as Eden MP, voted for the anti-nuclear law’, says
Mr Northey.
“ It will keep Australian nuclear-powered submarines away from New Zealand as effectively and justifiably as it has kept
nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed warships from other countries out of New Zealand waters for the last 36 years,
including those from China, India, France, UK and USA.”
Mr Northey says it is important to retain our ban on nuclear powered or armed warships.
“If we allowed any nuclear submarine into Auckland or Wellington Harbours a nuclear accident resulting from collision,
grounding, fire, explosion or reactor leaks could have dire consequences for human and marine life and jeopardise
shipping, fishing, recreation and other marine based activities for generations.”
“Another concern is that the nuclear reactors in the submarines to be acquired by Australia use highly enriched uranium
(HEU) rather than low-enriched uranium (LEU) - the normal fuel for nuclear reactors. HEU is the principal material
required to make a nuclear bomb.
This is why the JCPOA – the Iran nuclear deal – restricts Iran to producing only LEU (under 20% uranium enrichment).
Although Australia is not interested in using HEU to make a nuclear bomb, providing Australia, a state member of the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), with HEU (at around the 50% enrichment level) for nuclear-powered submarines,
could open the floodgates to other countries acquiring HEU powered submarines in order to develop a capacity to then
make a bomb.
This development could throw a spanner in the works of the upcoming NPT Review Conference early next year.
Also of concern is the fact that the new Australian submarines, while not nuclear armed, appear to be part of an
escalating political and military confrontation between the new AUKUS alliance (Australia, UK and the USA) and China
following the adoption of the new AUKUS defence pact announced on September 15th. Such confrontation risks a very
destructive war, is unlikely to resolve the differences with China and is immensely wasteful and damaging to building a
peaceful, equitable and collaborative world.
Any concerns about China’s military activities and human rights record, need to be dealt with through diplomacy, seeking
common security, the application of international law, and utilizing conflict resolution mechanisms including those
available through the United Nations and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
We appeal to the Australian government to re-think its approach, refrain from further conflict escalation, and give
increasing priority to key addressing serious human security issues of today and tomorrow including the COVID pandemic,
climate change, famine and poverty, rather than pouring resources into Great Power rivalries which were so disastrous in
the 19th and 20th centuries.
We welcome New Zealand Prime Minister Ardern’s reaffirmation of the NZ nuclear free policy and the New Zealand
government’s primary focus on diplomacy, and we support those voices in Australia, including the distinguished former
Prime Minister Paul Keating, which are calling on their government to re-think and reverse this decision.”