The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Simon Upton, is to be congratulated on a thoughtful, reflective
report that covers the long-term challenges facing environmental research in Aotearoa New Zealand.
warrants serious consideration by Government and policymakers, says Distinguished Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, Director
of Koi Tū: The Centre for Informed Futures at the University of Auckland.
Sir Peter, the former Chief Science Advisor to the Prime Minister and President-elect of the International Science
Council says: “High quality, long-term research that supports the environment is key to New Zealand’s future. The
comprehensive nature of this report by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE) offers an opportunity
for ongoing in-depth analysis and discussion about how to optimally use funds for environmental research and therefore
the public good.”
He says the review complements Koi Tū reports produced this year – The environment is now and The future of food and the primary sector: a journey to sustainability – which argue the environment must be central to all future decision making.
Environmental research funding is administered by a number of sources. Sir Peter says the long-term nature of
environmental research is not suited to the current competitive funding models, which tend to focus on relatively
short-term excellent and high impact research.
One PCE report recommendation is to implement and fund an environment research strategy through an expert-led
Environmental Research Council. The complexity and often long-term nature of environmental research has strong parallels
with medical research which, for many years, has been well supported by the Health Research Council.
The review also emphasises the importance of databases and collections which rapidly lose value if funding is
discontinued or interrupted.
“It is through meticulous and continuous work that real and perennially applicable discoveries are made. For
environmental research, this work can overturn long held assumptions and very often spawn new ideas and directions,”
says Sir Peter.
He says the Parliamentary Commissioner’s report identifies many arguments for a fundamental rethink of our science
system, both within the University and Crown Research Institute system and in its relationship to public good and
economic outcomes.
The recent Koi Tū report The future is now: exploring the post-pandemic direction for Aotearoa New Zealand also calls for a collective of stakeholders – Government, scientists and end users – to work together to develop a fit
for purpose science system.