Euthanasia Referendum Result Extremely Disappointing
“The voters of New Zealand have spoken, and we are
naturally extremely
disappointed with the outcome
of the End of Life Choice Act Referendum,”
Care
Alliance spokesperson Doctor Sinead Donnelly says. “This
is not
what we worked for.”
“While we
know and accept that the law will now come into force in
12
months’ time, we also know that it is a law
that will create significant
problems and place
many vulnerable New Zealanders at risk of a
wrongful
and premature death. That worries us
greatly.
“One of the critical things going forward
is to capture accurate
information around the
application of the Act and the reasons people
are
choosing it. It is important that the law
operates in a fully
transparent way and that people
will be fully accountable, including the
Ministry
of Health. We will advocate strongly for this.
“The
result does not change the fact that this law is poorly
drafted and
dangerous with weak or non-existent
safeguards. As we have said on many
occasions, it
exposes vulnerable people to too many risks; it is
weaker
than similar overseas laws; it won’t lead
to better health outcomes for
the most
disadvantaged New Zealanders, including Pasifika and Maori
who
die on average 7 years earlier than the rest of
us.
“It is well known that access to quality
palliative in New Zealand
depends on your postcode.
Meanwhile, it is also well established
overseas
that people choose an assisted death because they lack
access
to other care options and/or because they
feel they are a burden to
their family or to an
over-stretched health system. To us that
is
unacceptable. Until palliative care is properly
resourced, we know that
the choice of an assisted
death will not be a real choice for many
people and
therein lies a challenge for us all.
“We must work
harder than we ever have to bring about more
equitable
access to good healthcare, including
quality palliative care, to all in
New Zealand and
to mitigate the not inconsiderable risks that
accompany
this very dangerous and weak law. Good
compassionate and dignified care
demands nothing
less. We will continue to advocate for the needs of
the
most
vulnerable.”