INDEPENDENT NEWS

New Boundaries Generate Call for Electoral System Re-Vamp

Published: Wed 20 Nov 2019 08:25 AM
Social Credit is calling for a complete revamp of the electoral system.
The release of the proposed new electoral boundaries is an appropriate time to consider whether our electoral system is fit for purpose or needs a complete revamp.
MMP is not a system designed to provide voters with power in a democracy but one that is designed to provide party hierarchies with list MPs to use as cannon fodder to support their own pet positions on numerous issues.
When the public revolted in 1981 over the inequity of Social Credit gaining 21% of the nationwide vote but only two MPs, and demanded that the first-past-the-post electoral system be done away with, the Siamese twins of National and Labour and their establishment backers promoted MMP because it was the proportional system that still retained the most power for their party hierarchies.
List MPs have to be 'yes' men and women in order to get the backing of their party hierarchy to get high enough places on the list and be in with a chance of becoming an MP.
Once in parliament that ‘yes sir’ ‘no sir’ behaviour continues so that they can be sure of retaining their list place and getting back in at the next election.
They don't need to represent the views of voters because they don't have an electorate that they are required to front up to at subsequent elections.
Any thought of questioning their party's position, having dissenting views, or crossing the house to vote with other parties on matters of principle is immediately ruled out.
Our democracy suffers as a result.
In its extensive submissions to the Royal Commission at the time, Social Credit promoted the Single Transferable Vote system of proportional representation which is designed to confer maximum power on voters, reduce the power of party bosses, and, unlike MMP, ensure that every vote counts towards the election of an MP.
Every MP would be directly elected by the public, whereas under MMP, nearly half our MPs are foisted on the public and vote in parliament on matters of critical importance without the public having any influence on the matter.
Under an STV system, electorates would be larger but have more than one MP elected from each one, providing a better choice for voters, and a greater chance of independent MPs gaining a seat.
STV is already used to vote for eleven local authorities.

Next in New Zealand politics

Gordon Campbell on welfare vs infrastructure spending
By: Gordon Campbell
New direction for criminal justice reform
By: New Zealand Government
Surgical mesh restorative justice report received
By: New Zealand Government
Government’s power to order decryption must respect privacy
By: Joint Press Release
National will invest in quality healthcare
By: New Zealand National Party
Report on combatting foreign election interference delivered
By: RNZ
Name suppression lifted for officers A & B
By: New Zealand Police
Child Poverty Monitor: Big, bold, permanent change needed
By: Office of the Children's Commissioner
Chief Victims Advisor reappointed for a further two years
By: New Zealand Government
Justice report highlights systemic racism and inequality
By: Green Party
"The Best Christmas present ever"
By: Wellington Howard League
First Step toward Protecting Our First Responders
By: New Zealand First Party
Report: Stories of Survivors of Surgical Mesh
By: Ministry of Health
National will deliver high-quality care for women
By: New Zealand National Party
Surgical Mesh Restorative Justice Report Finally Released
By: Mesh Down Under
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media