INDEPENDENT NEWS

Kiwis oppose implications of euthanasia process

Published: Tue 20 Aug 2019 02:23 PM
Euthanasia-Free NZ urge MPs to consider concerns relevant to tomorrow’s debate on Part 2 of the End of Life Choice Bill.
Part 2 is about freedom of conscience rights and each step of the proposed process: from making a request to reporting the death.
As lawyers would know, it's important to consider the possible loopholes in a piece of legislation: What would it do and allow, even if not explicitly stated?
Two Curia Market Research Polls conducted earlier this year found that the majority of respondents are opposed to circumstances the Bill’s proposed process would allow. None of these concerns are addressed by David Seymour's proposed amendments. Their concerns are noteworthy especially since the majority of the 1,048 respondents are in favour of the concept of euthanasia.
The Bill would allow an eligible terminally ill person to request euthanasia:
1) without telling loved ones (opposed by 73%);
2) instead of treatment (opposed by 60%);
3) because they feel like a burden (opposed by 64%); and
4) because they feel depressed or that life is meaningless (opposed by 55%).
There's a distinction between eligibility criteria and reasons for requesting euthanasia.
“In its current form the Bill would not require a doctor to explore or consider the underlying reasons why an eligible person wants to die,” says Renée Joubert, Executive Officer of Euthanasia-Free NZ.
“The unbearable suffering a person experiences may not be caused by their medical condition. Instead the person may be suffering due to issues such as poverty, homelessness, abuse, neglect, loneliness, mental illness, depression, grief, bereavement or concern about being a burden.”
Part 2 is by far the most substantial part of the Bill, consisting of 17 clauses and almost 11 pages. In contrast, Part 1, which was debated on 31 July, consists of only 5 sections and almost 4 pages.
"We were shocked that the debate on Part 1 was cut short when some MPs still wished to speak and several proposed amendments had not even been mentioned, let alone debated," says Ms Joubert. "And that, after many MPs stated that they voted for the Bill at second reading in order for the House to have an extensive discussion.
"Since Part 2 is about the crux of the Bill, we hope that its details, as well as each of the proposed amendments, will receive discussion and unprejudiced scrutiny.
"Our members and supporters will be watching tomorrow's debate with interest."
END

Next in New Zealand politics

On The Ethics (and Some Of The Economics) Of Lifting The Lockdown
By: Gordon Campbell
On Going To Level Four (and Scrapping The Olympics) Right Now
By: Gordon Campbell
Cabinet Approves Business Continuity Package In Response To COVID-19
By: New Zealand Government
Statement From Police Commissioner Mike Bush Following Guilty Pleas In Operation Deans Prosecution
By: New Zealand Police
Record transport investment in Draft GPS 2021
By: New Zealand Government
On The Loss Of Abortion Safe Zones
By: Gordon Campbell
On The Oil Price Smackdown, And On National’s Fatuous Crusade Against Red Tape
By: Gordon Campbell
Predator Free 2050 Strategy - Expert Reaction
By: Science Media Centre
On Buying Ventilators, And Expanding The Testing For Covid-19
By: Gordon Campbell
Advance payments to support contractors
By: New Zealand Government
Auckland Council Welcomes Package To Stimulate Economic Recovery
By: Auckland Council
Infrastructure Sector Sees 30 Percent Less Jobs
By: Infrastructure NZ
COVID-19 And The Fundamentals Of Living On A Timed Borrow
By: Nikko AM
Fixing Wellington’s Infrastructure Deficit Should Be Top Of Government’s To-do List
By: Business Central
Nation Steps Up To COVID-19 Alert Level 2
By: New Zealand Government
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media