INDEPENDENT NEWS

Judgment: M v Roper and Anor

Published: Thu 6 Sep 2018 10:01 AM
The following is based on automated text recognition. Please refer to the original PDF.
M v Roper and Anor [2018] NZHC 2330
5 September 2018
MEDIA RELEASE - FOR PUBLICATION AT 3.30 pm on Wednesday, 5 September 2018
This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court's judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
Background
This judgment arises from a civil claim for damages brought by a former member of the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) against one of her superiors, a former Sergeant Robert Roper.
The claimant, M, sought damages from Mr Roper for mental harm she alleged was caused by the bullying, verbal abuse and sexual harassment he inflicted on her between 1985 and 1988. As well as damages against Mr Roper, M sought damages against the RNZAF for failing to act on her complaints about Mr Roper and failing to take all reasonable steps to protect her. Mr Roper denied the allegations, and the RNZAF, the second defendant, denied that M had made the complaints, and that there was a failure to take all reasonable steps to protect M from harm.
I addition, both defendants argued that even if M were able to establish the alleged acts caused the mental harm for which she claimed damages, the claim could not succeed because of the statutory bar under the Limitation Act 1950 and under the Accident Compensation Act 2001.
Even if all these hurdles could be overcome, the RNZAF argued it could not be held liable, whether vicariously or directly, for any of the loss claimed by M.
Result
Edwards J found the events M said gave rise to her claim had likely occurred, albeit not with the frequency alleged. Specifically, the findings of fact established that Mr Roper assaulted and falsely imprisoned M as alleged.
The Judge accepted M suffers from symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety, as attested by expert evidence. However, in order for a damages claim to succeed in law, the Court had to be satisfied that M's experiences at Whenuapai were a "substantial and material cause of these symptoms.
After careful review of the medical evidence, and faced with M's clear presentation of a current mental injury, Edwards J found, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Roper's actions at Whenuapai were a material and substantial cause of M's current mental injury, being her PTSD.
However, the Judge found that M's claim could not ultimately succeed because M could not escape the statutory bar on bringing claims out of time created by the Limitation Act 1950, nor the provisions of the Accident Compensation Act which preclude a person from suing for compensatory damages in relation to an injury for which they are, or were, entitled to cover under that scheme.
The finding that the claim was statute-barred meant the Court was not required to consider whether or not the RNZAF could have been held liable, whether vicariously or directly, for any of the loss claimed by M.
The names, address or identifying occupations of the victim and a witness are suppressed.
Full judgment: MvRoper.pdf

Next in New Zealand politics

Government to end tenure review
By: New Zealand Government
A new future for work skills training in NZ
By: New Zealand Government
Progress Stalled in Reducing Inequality
By: Salvation Army
SSC to seek answers on IRD survey
By: New Zealand Government
Prohibiting smoking in vehicles carrying children for health
By: New Zealand Government
Nationwide events to commemorate Waitangi Day 2019
By: New Zealand Government
Change to how iconic high country land is managed
By: New Zealand Government
High Country farmers face more uncertainty, costs
By: New Zealand National Party
Forest & Bird welcomes end to tenure review
By: Forest And Bird
Fish and Game welcomes the halt to tenure reviews
By: NZ Fish and Game Council
EDS not convinced abandoning tenure review is a good thing
By: Environmental Defence Society
Purchase of unique North Otago reserve announced
By: New Zealand Government
Regions will suffer under centralisation of training
By: New Zealand National Party
SIT should not be merged
By: New Zealand National Party
Govt should privatise vocational education
By: ACT New Zealand
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media