The Nation: Employment Minister Willie Jackson
On Newshub Nation: Lisa Owen interviews Employment Minister Willie Jackson
Lisa Owen: The
government set aside $15 million dollars over four years for
a plan to get more young people into work. There are
currently 70,000 young people not in employment, education
or training, referred to as NEETs. And while overall
unemployment figures are coming down, Maori unemployment
rates are still twice that of the general population.
Employment Minister Willie Jackson joins me now. Good
morning, Minister.
Willie Jackson: Good
morning. Kia ora. Kia ora, Lisa.
So,
unemployment – currently 4.5 per cent or thereabouts. Is
the government still aiming to get down to 4 per cent in
this first term?
Oh, absolutely. That’s
always been the goal, and we’re on track. When I came in,
into the portfolio, I inherited 4.9 per cent, so I think
we’re doing well.
What’s driving the drop,
do you reckon?
We’re investing in areas
that the previous government forgot all about. You know? So
when I came in, the employment figures were 4.9 per cent,
but the reality was that—
They were on a
downward trend, though.
They were on a
downward trend, but there’s statistics, and then there’s
statistics. The reality is you know and I know that the
stats for Maori, the stats for Pacific Islanders, the stats
for women, were terrible, basically. But we’ve put some
real investment in those areas. I’m really pleased with
some of the results we’re getting. I’ve rolled out He
Poutama Rangatahi, which we’ve talked about. And so
we’ve seen some turnarounds in terms of youth, in terms of
NEETs. We’ve taken that from 80,000 down to 72,000, and
Maori unemployment has come down, and Maori employment has
gone up. So in terms of the women’s area, things have gone
up. So, I mean, I think we’re tracking in the right
direction.
Okay, well, let’s look at it in a
bit more detail. Maori unemployment - 9.4 per cent. What are
you aiming to reduce that to in this
term?
The reality is we are working hard. We
haven’t come up with a final figure yet.
Why
no target?
Well, it would be great if we
could get it down to 5 per cent, 6 per cent, you know? If we
could pull it right down. It would be great if we could get
it where the general figure is. But that’s going to
require targeted funding and targeted resourcing. And
we’ve done pretty well so far. I mean, we’ve only been
in eight or nine months.
Okay, we will talk
more about in a second. But that 5 per cent or 6 per cent,
is that a target?
Well, we talk about it,
but we know what the general population is,
right?
Yeah.
So we are talking
4.5 per cent right now. If we could get close to that, that
would be great. But it’s going to require a heck of a lot
of work. But we’ve brought it down. It was nearly triple
when I took over.
Why don’t you set a
target, though? Because people will sit there … You’ve
set a target for the general population of 4 per cent.
Don’t you have the same aspirations for
Maori?
Absolutely.
Why not
write them down, make it a
target?
Absolutely, but, look, the reality,
Lisa, is that the resourcing and funding for Maori, over the
previous nine years, has been minimal. So we’ve had
governments who have given scraps to Maori. And so what we
are doing and what I’m doing in terms of Maori caucus -
and as you know I co-chair that caucus - we are working on
our funding in our resourcing strategy right now. And so we
went down a universal strategy in the last budget. But if we
can get a more targeted budgeting strategy, then we can work
towards the percentages that you are talking about today.
But we didn’t have a strong targeted funding strategy in
the last budget.
Right. Okay. Your own Prime
Minister has said that everything in coalition is a
negotiation,
right?
Absolutely.
So you are
making noises there about more targeted
funding.
Yup.
How easy is that
going to be to get partial coalition partners? You are
saying targeted to Maori.
The reality is
that we didn’t have a strong targeted funding
strategy.
But, Minister, to be
clear, you are talking about
targeting specifically for Maori
unemployment.
That’s right. That’s
right.
Okay, so how hard is that going to be
to get past the coalition partners?
I
don’t think it’s going to be too hard.The Greens have
been very supportive, and we have wonderful debates with
Winston and Shane Jones, of course. And, look, Winston
Peters is very aware of that. He comes from the North. He
understood the strategy in terms of the first budget. The
second budget, as Minister Robertson knows, is going to have
to target certain groups who may have missed out the first
time. So some of our groups did not get funding supported in
the different areas, however, in the universal area, there
was a lot of Maori who benefited from the payments, from the
winter payments, from the family benefit payments, so we
were really pleased with what Maori got in a general sense.
However, to get to some of those hard groups, we are going
to require continual targeted funding like we’ve had from
He Poutama Rangatahi in the last nine
months.
So while previously you may have
emphasised universality, you now recognise that that is not
going to solve all your problems.
I’ve
always recognised universality and targeted funding. You
need both strategies. The Labour Party recognises both too.
Minister Robertson recognises both too. The emphasis the
first time was on universality, because too many Maori were
sleeping in cars; too many Maori were dying because of a
poor health system, so we had to try and get them the
budgets and the funding and the resourcing to the bigger
crowd, I suppose. We couldn’t just go to our
providers.
But next time round you’re
suggesting you’re going for more targeted – that’s
your aim. So where do you want to see the money go
specifically? What projects are you looking for more money
for, targeted?
For next time, obviously
we’ll be looking in the Maori health area; it’s a huge
area. Maori employment, as we’ve talked about today, is
really, really important. Whanau Ora is really, really
important.
So important that funding’s on
hold at the moment.
Well, I mean, it was a
very responsible budget that was rolled out by the Minister
of Finance last time, and he had to go through the different
areas. Where was the need? The need was in South Auckland,
West Auckland, where we had people sleeping in cars. And so
enough funding has gone out there so that we can have
families looked after, and it’s been a reasonable winter
for families who have been beneficiaries of the Families
Package and the Winter Payment and payments like
that.
All right. You’re talking big picture;
let’s talk specifics. So, overall, unemployment is
tracking downward, right? 4.8 per cent at this time last
year, now down to 4.5 per cent. But the gap – the gap
between Maori and non-Maori is persistent.
Sure.
Specifically, what is
your plan to close that gap?
To have more
funding and resources.
How
much?
Well, when you talk about how
much—
And where?
Well, we
need more resourcing. And, look, I’ll just give you an
example. In the last nine months we’ve poured just over
$13 million, $14 million into the regions, into youth in
terms of He Poutama Rangatahi. What have we got from that?
We’ve got some real results. We need some more investment
in the regions. In the north, you’ve got almost
third-world conditions. When we go into the communities,
they embrace us. I’ve enjoyed the last nine months, in
terms of seeing people smiling and happy that we’ve gone
in. Because, the way I see it, Poutama Rangatahi has been
crucial in turning people’s lives around. So you’re
asking how much – we’ve just put 14 million into the
regions.
That’s what you’ve done. We’re
talking about what’s coming next. So have you got a
specific programme in mind with a specific number that you
need for it?
Yes, it’s called He Poutama
Rangatahi. And that work’s got to continue, in terms of
the youth and in terms of Maori and in terms of, also, young
Pakeha too. I’m not just the Minister for Maori. I’m
the Minister for all peoples.
How much more
money do you need for that, though?
I
don’t want to, really, because I’ve got to talk with the
Minister of Finance over the next week.
Give
me a ballpark. Give me a ballpark,
Minister.
No, no, because the Minister of
Finance knows that more funding and resourcing has to go
into the regions.
Tens of millions? Tens of
millions in a project.
Obviously there’s
millions of dollars that need to go back into the regions to
support young people.
No, but that programme,
sorry to interrupt, but that programme specifically, I know
you don’t want to name an actual number. But, what, more
than the $30 million that Winston Peters is going to get for
his racing track?
You need to do some
research on what was budgeted for that programme in previous
years. But $13 million has gone out over the last nine
months. I’ve got people queuing at my door in the regions
for more funding and more resourcing and I’m going to have
that conversation with the Minister of Finance in the next
week, and he’s—
So the budgeted money is
$15 million over four years.
He’s happy.
He’s happy with the results that are coming back, and
we’ll talk further. But I’m not going to talk the
figures on here, in terms of, you know, us going forward.
Because he’s a responsible budgeter.
All
right, let’s move on then. In the latest ANZ Business
Outlook Survey, businesses across sectors said that
they’re less likely to hire new people, and, in
particular, fewer jobs are expected in agriculture and
construction. So how are you going to counter that? Where
are the jobs going to come from?
We’re
going to work with agriculture, and we’re working with
construction right now. I mean, we’re working with them in
terms of the seasons and what’s happening. We had labour
shortages in agriculture, in those areas and in the building
sector. So we’re hoping through our different strategies,
like Mana in Mahi and our skills programmes, to generate
work, to generate those jobs. And, you know, we’re
optimistic. There’s a group of ministers who work right
across the spectrum in terms of employment. We’re putting
in plans and strategies for all those different
areas.
But one of the big concerns that ANZ’s chief
economist said for these businesses is meeting growing wage
costs. Obviously, you’ve put up the minimum wage — the
$16.50 — and you’ve got plans to raise it to $20 by
2021. So how many jobs do you think that that’s going to
cost you?
Well, we always get that response. We always
get that response — how many jobs—
It’s
a legitimate question though, isn’t
it?
The reality is we’re going to invest
in our young people, and we’re going to invest— Mana in
Mahi, we think is going to generate 4000 jobs, for instance,
over the next few—
You’ve got 70,000
NEETs.
Yeah, but you’ve got to make a
start somewhere. We’ve got a number of strategies across
the spectrum. Now, Mana in Mahi will be fantastic, we think.
We’re going to start in the building industry, and it’s
going to roll right across the spectrum in terms
of—
So, back to the original question,
raising the minimum wage is a concern for businesses meeting
their costs, so how many jobs do you think it’s going to
cost to put it up to that 20 bucks an hour by
2021?
See, every time we raise the minimum
wage, every time — it happened with the previous Labour
government — we had this talk about how many jobs is that
going to cost. You know, there’s always dire predictions
that hundreds and thousands of jobs are going to be lost.
And what happens at the end of it? Business goes on. You
know, you can have all the reports run
from—
Well, the ministry advice, which
you’re probably aware of, said 30,000 jobs won’t be
created as a result of bumping the wage up to $20.20 was the
figure they used—
That’s the living wage
you’re talking about.
Yeah. I suppose the
question is – is the policy counter-productive to
legislate a rise in wages so significant? I mean, how can
you have a more productive economy where people earn better
wages and still keep employment at your goal of 4 per
cent?
Well, the reality is we have to have
an economy that works for everyone. That’s what we have to
do. We can’t just have a group of people who do well off
the economy. We’ve had thousands of New Zealanders who
have missed out through this economy over the previous nine
years. What we’re trying to do is rebalance things;
we’re trying to rebalance things. So you’ve heard the
Minister of Finance, the Minister of Transport. We’re
going to invest in infrastructure. We’re going to invest
in housing. There’s regional investment. So we’ve got
investment everywhere. And through that, what’s going to
come off that is more employment, more support. There’s
obviously going to be some flow-on effects from all the
investments that we’re making, and there’s going to be
more and more jobs. So you’re asking how we’re going to
go forward. We’re going to go forward by investing in
these major projects and working with employers all the
time. And we’re looking at business. We bring big business
into the Parliament, and we’re working with them closely,
so we’re a government who want to invest in opportunity.
You’ve heard all the talk. So all this dire talk about us
not getting to 4 per cent, I don’t— I think we’ll get
very close to it with the type of investment that is being
made at the moment and, of course, the investment that
we’re making in terms of the regions, which I’m really
looking forward to.
Does quality of job
matter? Because if you’re looking at productivity, 1017
people are considered to be under-employed, meaning that
they’re working less than 30 hours a week and they want to
work more. So is quality of work important or is it just
getting them off your statistics and getting them into
employment?
This is not a National Party
government. This is a government that cares about workers’
dignity. This is a government— a passionate government, a
caring government, as our Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has
said all the time. So it’s not just about throwing them
the broom and saying, ‘There’s your job’. We want jobs
with dignity. We want people to know that they’ve got
certainty of contract. We’re trying to rebalance the
workplace. Iain Lees-Galloway is doing some terrific work in
that area. We’re trying to get some equity in there. Now,
that doesn’t mean to say that we want to stamp all over
employers. We want to work with employers. But we want them
to work closely with us. We want them to provide
opportunities. We want them to listen to workers. We want
workers to have a voice too. So it’s about getting the
balance right, and it’s just going to take a little
while.
We’ve got a bit to get through, so a
couple of things I’d like a few quick answers. Mana in
Mahi — how much do you think that programme’s going to
cost overall?
Well, it’s going to cost $13
million in terms of the pastoral care — that was what we
talked about. You guys ran a stupid
story—
$13 million in pastoral care. Okay,
so—
In pastoral care, but we’re $15 to
$16 million overall. But it’s a zero budget transfer,
because basically they were—
Money coming
from the dole payments—
That’s right,
but you guys made a big fuss about it and got the whole
story wrong.
I don’t think you found that on
Newshub Nation. The Mana in Mahi pilot at the moment — 150
people. You want to get up to 4000 by next year. Seriously,
how are you going to ramp it up that
quickly?
Well, we have a big PR campaign
that’s happening right now. It’s going to happen very
shortly. We want to bring small- to medium-term employers
on. We want—
How confident are you that you
can meet that target by the end of
2019?
We’re going to give it a great shot,
the Prime Minister’s said.
Would you stake
your job on it?
Well, we don’t want to get
carried away, Lisa, right? But we’ll give it a good shot.
And we’ve had great reaction, great response. Even the
National Party, I think, are supporting us on
this.
We’ve had four emergency labour
shortages in the past 10 months. That’s for seasonal work.
How many workers short are we going to be this
spring/summer?
Willie Jackson: Well,
hopefully, not as many as we had last
summer.
Do you have a number,
though?
Well, no, because you’ll have to
ask them, but what we do want to do is work with those
employers. We don’t want seasonal workers to be treated
like nobodies. We don’t want- here, we had the labour
shortages in the Hawke’s Bay and East Coast, right? And we
had an industry crying out for workers in those areas to
come and pick the fruit off their trees, and the workers
were sitting right on their doorsteps. Those workers have to
be treated with respect. They have to be looked after. They
have to be given transport allowances. You know, the key to
solving the seasonal problems and the seasonal crisis is not
by opening up the visa and by bringing in more and more
immigrants.
So don’t bring in any more,
you’re saying?
No, I’m not saying
that-
11,100 on those visas – no, just very
quickly – 11,100 capped on those RSE visas. The growers
reckon they could do with 13,100, so, but what? Don’t put
it up?
No, we’ll work with the growers in
terms of developing a work strategy where we can bring local
people in, look after New Zealanders, and, obviously, if we
have to fill a hole, we’ll bring immigrants in. But
we’re about supporting New Zealanders and New Zealand
workers who have been shut out, and you just can’t have a
crisis when you’ve got workers sitting on your doorstep
down there.
All right. Let’s move on. It’s
been a tough fortnight for the labour caucus. Meka Whaitiri
– is she still the co-chair of the Labour Maori
caucus?
Yes.
Is that
appropriate?
Yes.
Why?
Well,
in this country–
She stood down – serious
allegations here.
In this country, we go
through certain processes, and she’s got to go through a
process, so she’s still a Member of
Parliament.
But she’s been stood down from
her portfolios, so is there a different standard for the
Maori caucus?
No. Not at all. What we
believe in is justice, and I won’t be commenting on the
process, but she is still the MP for Ikaroa-Rawhiti, she is
still the co-chair, along with myself, for the Maori caucus,
and I think all New Zealanders would think that there’s
got to be an investigation and a process to go through
before we try and shut Meka Whaitiri down, who’s made a
great contribution, not just to the Maori caucus over the
years, but to the Labour Party.
So how is
morale in the Labour
caucus?
Fantastic.
What? With
two cabinet ministers side-lined in two weeks? Really? Is
morale fantastic?
Well, look, as the Prime
Minister said, that’s government. That’s politics. These
things happen, but what you and Duncan Garner might perceive
as a big crisis and catastrophe happening is not the reality
out on the streets. I’ve been in the regions for the last
couple of weeks with people like Shane Jones. People have
been embracing us. They can see that we’ve got a plan.
They like what the–
Meka Whaitiri wasn’t
stood down at that point.
No, hang on –
but things happen. That’s politics, and we’ll work
through that, but our people on the streets – I live in
South Auckland, and –
Should things like
this happen, though? Should thing like this happen,
Minister, where you get two ministers stood down within two
weeks – one for a serious misstep, and another for an
extremely serious allegation?
Well,
allegations are allegations, and you’ve still got to go
through that process. Both those ministers are big
contributors to the Labour Party, and we should just let the
process run its course and not try and say that the Labour
Party’s falling apart, because the Labour Party’s never
been stronger, and there’s some inspirational leadership
that’s coming from, not just our leader, but from our
senior ministers like Twyford, Robertson, Parker, you
know?
Well, we’re talking about Meka
Whaitiri here. So if Meka Whaitiri – if the allegations
against her are proven, should she go from Parliament all
together?
I’m not prepared to talk about
that.
You won’t tell us what your standards
are?
Well, our
standards–
No, you personally. Do you think,
if the allegations against her are proven, that she should
go from Parliament all together?
No, I
don’t think it’s right to speculate about Meka at this
time. She needs to be given some respect that there’s an
investigation in place, so it’s inappropriate for me to
comment.
All right. Let me put it another way
– as Minister of Employment, in your view, is there ever
any excuse for bullying or physical violence in the
workplace?
Well, of course not. Of course
not, and I have a high standard there, as does Meka
Whaitiri. But you shouldn’t try and insinuate that she’s
guilty already.
I’m not; I’m just asking
you the basic question.
Yes, but the way
you’re asking it, Lisa, is that she’s gone. You know,
just because the allegation has been made doesn’t mean
it’s true. There’s still a process to go
through.
Thank you for joining me this
morning. That is our Minister of Employment Willie
Jackson.
Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz
________________________________________
Newshub
Nation on TV3, 9.30am Saturday, 10am Sunday. Proudly brought
to you by New Zealand on Air’s Platinum
Fund.