The Free Speech Coalition has now filed proceedings against Mayor Goff and Auckland Council under the New Zealand Bill
of Rights Act.
This came after the Coalition presented the Mayor with an open lettersuggesting he avoid the cost of litigation by reopening discussions with the promoters of the event in question.
The open letter outlined:
• The Council declined to discuss security concerns with organisers or Police prior to Phil Goff's tweet.
• There was no time pressure justification for the Council's sudden, uninformed decision.
• So far no privately-owned venues in Auckland have been found to be available or suitable in such a short time
frame.
• In Australia, all but one of the venues hosting the speakers are owned by local councils or state government.
There is no reason for Auckland to be an outlier.
• The Council has left the Coalition with no other option but to seek urgent judicial relief.
The Coalitions gets the impression the Mayor is eager for the Police to say they can't uphold their duty to keep the
piece and protect free speech – a sad contrast with Australia that we never expected.
Coalition member Melissa Derby says, “The Council’s arbitrary and uninformed decision making process suggests bias,
prejudgment, and indifference to the fundamental freedoms outlined in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. It’s
regrettable to see the Mayor digging his heels in when we have given him every opportunity to reconsider and avoid
litigation costs.”
David Cumin, a member of the Coalition and also a plaintiff in the proceedings, says, “Despite his earlier tweets, Mr
Goff now claims it wasn’t about banning the speakers because of their political views, but about safety. What he risks
is delivering a ‘heckler’s veto’, where potential protesters get to decide who Aucklanders can hear from or associate
with.”
“This action is to ensure that politicians and officials aren't allowed to discriminate against views they dislike when
it comes to ratepayer-funded venues, regardless of how broadly 'unacceptable' the views might be.”
The plaintiffs in this action are:
• Axiomatic Media – the promoters of the Southern/Molyneux event.
• Malcolm Bruce Moncrief-Spittle – a bookseller living in Dunedin.
• David Cumin – an Auckland ratepayer and member of the Free Speech Coalition.
The defendants are:
• Regional Facilities Auckland (Auckland Live)
• Auckland Council
• Mayor Phil Goff
ENDS