The Nation: Lisa Owen interviews Phil Goff
On The Nation: Lisa Owen interviews Phil Goff
Headlines Auckland Mayor Phil Goff
says ratepayers will not pay a hosting fee for the Americas
Cup regatta. But he says there is infrastructure needed for
the Cup and some projects that are going to happen anyway
could be brought forward. Goff says he expects road
pricing to be introduced in the next decade, and the
regional fuel tax to be phased out. But he says at some
point Aucklanders may have to pay both at the same
time. Goff says there is still a $5.9billion deficit in
Auckland’s transport funding and he doesn’t know where
that money will come
from.
Lisa Owen:
Welcome back. Auckland Mayor Phil Goff has been under fire
this week after he presented a proposed 10-year budget that
includes a number of new rates. He has proposed a maximum
average rates rise of 2.5%. I spoke to him just before we
came on air this
morning.
We’ll
talk about rates in a minute, but let’s talk about
homelessness first. Auckland has the biggest homeless
population in the country. Can you see a need for a night
shelter?
Phil Goff: Well,
I’ve talked to most of the groups that work with the
homeless, and they tell me, ‘No. Don’t give us
short-term solutions that don’t take people anywhere. Get
in behind Housing First, as you’re doing. Let’s look at
permanent solutions. Let’s get people off the street into
houses of their own, but don’t just give them houses. Give
them the wraparound services that deal with all of the
problems in their lives that led them to becoming homeless
in the first place.’ That’s the advice I’m following.
It’s very strong advice. We will promote Housing First.
It’s proven to be effective, and I’m working with
ministers right now to see how we can ramp up what we’re
doing in this area.
So no help then from the
Council in respect of the
homeless…?
A lot of help
from the Council…
On the homeless shelter, I
mean. You know, no money. No help. No building or anything
like that.
We’ve put
quite a lot of money – a couple of million dollars –
into the James Liston Hostel, which is a short-term
accommodation facility, but everything I’m told by the
housing groups – ‘Please, get behind Housing First.
We’ve housed 221 people since we began that programme –
just six months ago – people and children. We want to ramp
up. We’ll get to 437, which is the target, by the end of
next year. I want to do even better than that. I think that
we can actually help hundreds and hundreds more people, and
the Government has indicated that they’re interested in
this problem, and they will help.
OK. Let’s
move on to your 10-year plan, your budget. You promised a
2.5% general rates increase. You add up all the levies or
the special rates – whatever you want to call them – and
it’s more than 6%, so some people will think you’ve lied
to them. Did you
lie?
That’s not true. I
promised 2.5. Actually, the average ratepayer in Auckland
– that’s a person with a home that’s worth just over a
million dollars – will get a net increase in their rates
in July next year of 1.4%, and given that other cities that
are big-growth cities around the North Island, are charging
double-figure rate increases, we’ve done remarkably
well.
Yeah, but you’re kind of skewing the
pitch a little bit because you’re taking out the interim
transport levy because you say there’s a regional fuel
tax. Let’s put that to one side because they cancel each
other out in essence. You’re taking one and
getting…
No. One’s
rates and one’s not.
But it’s a fee.
You’ve got a 2.8% water quality levy,
basically.
If people choose
to support that, and they will have that choice to give us
that feedback. This is a consultation
process.
But this is your preferred
option.
Absolutely, because
you and I want our kids to go to beaches that are safe and
healthy to swim in, and we want to stop pouring our sewerage
into the harbours, and I think most Aucklanders want to do
that, and that’s why I think they will support that
targeted rate.
Let’s just go through the
numbers then. 2.8% on the water quality, 0.9% on the levy,
and a promised cap of 2.5% on general rates. You add those
up to, what, 6.2%.
Yeah,
but you take off the 4.8% which was the interim transport
levy and you come to 1.4. What people…
But
they’re still going to be paying a petrol tax though,
aren’t they, Mr Goff? They’re still going to be paying a
petrol tax.
No, no, no.
Lisa. Yeah, of course, and I promised that, and I promised
that in this studio to you last year during the campaign. I
said I would keep average general rates at 2.5%, but there
would be a regional fuel tax. I’d push for that because I
didn’t think it was right that a pensioner out in the
suburbs that hardly used the transport system paid the same
as a big corporate with a fleet of trucks 24/7 on the road.
We’ve done away with the inequitable interim transport
levy. That’s $114 on your rates and on low-income
people’s rates, and we’ve replaced it with – or we
will replace it – with a fuel tax that will depend on how
often you use the roads. It’s user pays, and it makes
sense. It’s much fairer.
Couldn’t you have
been clearer about this, though, and
say…
I was absolutely
clear about it, and in this studio to you,
Lisa.
No. Not about the exact numbers –
about the principle, yes – but about the exact numbers,
and you can move these numbers around how you like. Some
people will look at this and say they’re getting a 6.2%
increase.
Yeah, but
they’re not. They’re not. When they pay
their…
So you feel you’ve absolutely told
the truth?
Look, and I’ve
set it out more clearly than I have in my mayoral proposal
where I set it out – how much you’ll pay a week, how
much you’ll pay a year, what the percentage is, and how we
arrive at that total. For the person with the average-priced
home in Auckland, when they go to pay their rates after July
next year, if this proposal is accepted, their rate bill
next year will be 1.4% higher than it was this year. They
will be paying a fuel levy. They know why they’re paying
that. We’ve got gridlock on the roads. I can do nothing
about it, if that’s what you’d prefer me to do, or I can
try to put more money into investment in our infrastructure,
and that’s what we’re doing. We’ll be putting $11
billion into transport infrastructure in the next 10 years,
but most importantly – and I want to come back to the
point you raised before – we will be cleaning up our
waterways after a century of every time it rains, the
wastewater overflowing into our streams and our harbours. We
will do something to cut that overflow by more than 80%. I
think Aucklanders will embrace that idea and that proposal.
They want something done about it.
So the
regional fuel tax –do you see that as a temporary measure,
or do you think that will be there
forever?
It won’t be
there forever. Give us 10 years, and most of us, like I am,
will be driving electric cars, so a fuel tax is not going to
be a long-term proposal.
Do you have an idea
in your head of a
timeframe?
I hope that it
stays there until the government and the council come up
with an alternative proposal that’ll be around demand
management. The last government was talking to me
about…
Congestion
charges.
A congestion
charge. The new government has said, ‘Look, we’ve got to
have some sort of demand management road pricing – smarter
road pricing. We’ll do that, just as London, Stockholm,
Singapore and other places have done.
So in
terms of congestion charging, are you thinking that
congestion charging will be a replacement for the fuel tax
or will be on top of the fuel
tax?
Oh, I’m not sure
yet. It’s some years off.
It’s possible
that there could be both – a congestion charge and a fuel
tax.
I think you’ll see
the removal of a fuel tax because it will no longer be
relevant because more and more people will be travelling in
electric-powered cars.
Yeah, okay, but
conceivably, we could still have a fuel tax and a congestion
charge.
Look, this is a
decision that’s probably four or five years out. I don’t
know yet. I don’t imagine that there’ll be the two of
them. I think you’ll simply have a form of smarter road
pricing that takes into account how often you drive and what
times of the day you drive to try to reduce congestion by
managing demand.
We know that Phil Twyford,
when he came in, when we last saw him, he said he was
expecting the previous government’s advice on congestion
charging to come across his desk. Have you seen that
yet?
Yeah. Look, we’ve
got a working party.
What did it recommend?
What did it recommend, Mr
Goff?
It hasn’t reported
yet. We’ve got a working party that is looking at how
smarter road pricing works around the world and how it might
best be adapted to Auckland.
Yeah, and I get
that, but the advice that the previous government had asked
for, you’ve seen it?
Oh,
they were in favour of it. I talked—
And
what timeframe did they favour in that advice that came
back?
My timeframe – I
said, look, Singapore has introduced—They’re wanting the
latest GPS-type congestion charge. It’s taken them some
years. We’re not going to go into technology that’s not
yet proven. I think personally it’ll be four or five years
off.
But what was the advice? In that
government advice, what did they
recommend?
No, they
haven’t reported yet. All I’m saying is that the
ministers in the last government were in favour of it and I
suspect that the ministers in the new government will be in
favour of it, because it makes sense.
Where
does all of this leave the Auckland Transport Alignment
Project? Because you’d agreed on the long-term projects,
and when we spoke last time, you said it was all up for
renegotiation. But is that dead in the water
now?
No, no, it’s
absolutely not dead in the water. You have to have a system
where council and the government are working together to
deal with congestion problems that are costing this country
– not just our city, this country – $2 billion a year,
so what the new government has said – we’ve got some
different priorities. We don’t want to do the East West
project in the way that it was set up. That was $1.8
billion. What we want to do is bring forward things like
light rail, more busways, more mass
transit.
Yeah, and those are the bits we know
about, so what about the bits that we don’t know about?
Are you still talking about that? What’s happening with
Penlink and the second harbour
crossing?
We’ve got a
programme to work with government over the next three
months. They will issue a government policy statement,
we’ll have a regional land transport plan, and we’ll
have a new ATAP alignment, but it will be worked and
negotiated together because we need to align what council is
doing with what government is doing; the old system didn’t
make sense, where the two were at odds and nothing happened.
We’ve got a massive problem in congestion. You know that
and I know that; we drive on the Auckland roads. We’ve got
to deal to it, and the regional fuel tax will help us do
that, but we need the ATAP programme to be finalised, and
I’m hoping that that will be done by the end of the first
quarter of next year.
We’re running out of
time, and there’s a couple of things I want to get to
quickly. The $7 billion shortfall – do you know where
that’s coming from
yet?
The $6 billion. $5.9,
actually. It’s a shedload of money. Yeah, we didn’t work
it out with the last government. They were coy about talking
about it before the election, which I
understand.
No, so this government’s still
not?
But we need to
negotiate that. My position is, look, every dollar that we
get out of the regional fuel tax will be hypothecated to
transport. That means we’re not going to spend it on other
things. It’s solely on transport, and we want that to be
our contribution.
But the point is you still
don’t know how much the government’s giving
you?
No, no, because they
haven’t got to that point yet. They’ve been in office a
matter of weeks, not years.
Well, given that
you have got shortfalls and, you know, you can only spend a
dollar once, there’s all this talk about the America’s
Cup. The hosting fee – who should pay that? Are we going
to pay that as Auckland
ratepayers?
No. I’ve been
pretty adamant about that.
Absolutely not?
Categorical assurance from
you?
Well, let me explain
it, please. First of all, we will put money into
infrastructure. What I’ve said to Team New Zealand is,
“You need a base for your syndicates. We will make sure
you need the land space and the water space to enable you to
host a successful cup in Auckland.” And that’s what
we’ll do. We’ll actually do something beyond that;
we’ll bring forward some of the infrastructure spend in
the centre city and the waterfront area that we were going
to spend on anyway, but we’ll bring it forward, so that is
another cost on us. Am I going to compete with so each
either the Russian mafia in that city and the Middle East,
Abu Dhabi, to pay $116 million? Not on your
life.
So that’s got to come from the
government?
Well, I don’t
think the government will want to pay that
money.
So who’s going to pay it,
then?
Well, I don’t mind
Team New Zealand having a go at it. The truth
is—
You could lose this over that, though.
You could lose it over
that.
Well, I’m sorry.
There is a bottom line for us. I’m the guardian of your
money and the ratepayers’ money, and I don’t have $116
million or anything like that or anything a fraction of that
to throw at it.
So you are prepared to lose it
if it does come down to someone having to stump up that
money and the government’s not going to do
it?
If the demand was we
had to put another $116 million in of the ratepayers’
money, my answer is no, we won’t do that. Do I think Team
New Zealand will walk away from Auckland? I don’t think
so. We’ve got the best harbour in the world to do this.
They are patriotic New Zealanders. They want to have the cup
here.
So does that include the hosting fee
too? No way, no how will you pay the hosting
fee.
Look, there’ll be a
negotiation, but I don’t have the money. It’s not my
money; it’s your money, and I’m not prepared to spend
money on a hosting agreement. That is not part of the deal.
The deal is to provide the
infrastructure.
Well, that’s a definitive
no, then, if you’re saying that you’re not going to go
to the ratepayers and ask them for it and you’ve got no
magic pot of money. That’s no to the hosting
fee.
I can’t spend money
that we don’t have, and I’m not intending to, and that
would not be my top priority when I’ve got huge priorities
right across the city on behalf of Aucklanders. And that’s
what Aucklanders tell me – “We want the cup here. We
really want to host the cup.” I want to host the cup. We
will pay a fair share to the infrastructure. I’m not up
for hosting agreement fees that were never paid in 1999 and
weren’t paid in 2003. I don’t believe they should be
paid this time.
That’s pretty clear. Thanks
for joining me,
Mayor.
Thank you. Thanks,
Lisa.
Appreciate your
time.
Transcript provided by Able. www.able.co.nz