12 Landlording Myths that Hold Back Residential Tenancy
The twelve landlording myths that hold back residential tenancy in New Zealand
The recent
strident criticisms of residential landlords and their
actions mostly rely on erroneous facts and incorrect
assumptions. These errors effectively stall any progress in
improving the residential tenancy laws and regulations in
this country. Debunking these 12 myths about landlords may
be a start in fixing a system that many consider broken, and
may help in establishing a more
co-operative rental
market.
“The public and political perception of landlords is quite bad. We are seen as uncaring rip-off merchants who lead idle lives while enjoying large, tax-advantaged incomes” says APIA Vice-President Peter Lewis. “The reality is quite different.”
Landlords
Are Always Buying and Selling Property
There is
investing, and there is speculating. Bookshop owners sell
books, not their shops. Similarly, Landlords rent out
accommodation rather than trade properties. Those people
who do trade in property are traders, developers or
renovators - not landlords, and are taxed on a different
basis. Many long-term landlords never sell a
property.
Landlords are Wealthy
Landlords are
often assumed to be wealthy with posh cars and posher
houses. Wrong. Over 90% of NZ landlords own just one or
two rental properties. When you attack and condemn landlords
you are not attacking Google or Apple, you are actually
criticising your next door neighbour, your plumber or your
local school teacher.
It should All Be
Free
Politicians like to promise ‘free’ social
benefits. There is no such thing as free. Free means
someone else is paying for it, often the end-user. When
dollar spent on mandatory rental upgrades will eventually be
passed on to the tenant.
Fairness is The Only
Way
Fairness is a highly nebulous concept, what
appears fair to you may seem highly unfair to another.
Fairness between a tenant and a landlord can only occur when
both are aware of their own rights and obligations, fulfill
those requirements, and recognise that each actually needs
the other. Indeed, we do need each other.
Overheads?
What Overheads?
Most tenants have never owned
property. They believe that the rent they pay goes entirely
into the Landlord’s pocket and then is spent on overseas
trips and flash cars. However, if you do own your own home,
you will appreciate that the price of the house is actually
only the down payment. Even without any mortgage burden the
constant stream of bills for rates, insurance, water, and
household services add up to a substantial and unavoidable
sum each and every year. Even on a modest suburban house the
first $80 or more of rent you pay each week goes straight
back out of the landlord’s pocket to pay for these
utilities.
Just Force them
We’ll force
them to . . . is a constant refrain. Compulsion never
works, at least not for long. Those with grey hair can
remember back when the 1970s Labour Government tried to
bring in a Maximum Retail Price scheme. Each item you bought
would have an MRP figure printed on it, and could not be
sold at a higher price. All that happened, of course, was
that many items just disappeared off the shelves. If the
supplier could not profit from selling it the manufacturers
simply did not make it. Later on, they tried to ‘force’
property developers to do this and that. Again, a massive
fail. Where are Universal and Beazley Homes these
days?
Landlords are Lazy Parasites
The man on
the top of the mountain did not fall there. Hardly any of
today’s Landlords woke up one morning to find – surprise
surprise - that they had got a rental or two overnight
without any effort. Acquiring an investment property and
then renting it out is, for those of us who don’t win
Lotto, a long hard self-sacrificing slog. Landlords,
generally speaking, are hardworking, thrifty and goal
orientated. These are the people that any sane society
should acknowledge, not vilify and punish.
Landlords
And Their Tax Loopholes
Landlords seek to make a
profit by renting out a property. Their income is the rent
they charge, and like any other business they can then
deduct the costs involved before paying tax on that income.
There are frequent demands for the tax loopholes that
landlords enjoy to be removed. This never happens - for the
simple reason that there aren’t any.
Back in 2007, at a
Parliamentary Select Committee hearing, Deputy IRD
Commissioner Robin Oliver was asked why people had the
impression that there was some tax advantage in investments
in rental housing. His reply was blunt: "The short answer is
there are none."
Landlords Should Be
Charitable
Landlords are frequently asked to
‘help’ their tenants. “Lower the rent you charge”
they are told “and your tenants will then be able to
afford the electricity to heat the place”. Quite why
Landlords should effectively subsidise the power companies
is never explained. Landlords are not WINZ. We pay taxes
which fund WINZ, and no-one demands that petrol companies
sell their fuel cheaper to the impoverished.
Tenants
Have No Rights
The Residential Tenancies Act was an
attempt to be even-handed. Both landlords and tenants seem
to think that it favours the other side, but the reality is
that it does confer rights on tenants. Every time I see a
solo mother of five crouched under a leaky roof with a
bucket for a toilet I think “Why doesn’t someone tell
her!”
If tenants don’t know about existing law,
surely an educational programme will work better than just
inventing new and harsher laws?
Long Term Is The Best
Term
Long term tenancy is the current catch
cry. They do it in Germany, why not here? Those who push
this barrow always conveniently omit the substantial
requirements that are imposed on those who enter into those
tenancies. No benefits will ever come without any reciprocal
obligations, both parties need to know that.
Hurt
them Until Their Eyes Water
Every Government action
creates two after-effects. Costs go up, and then people try
to alter their behaviour to avoid or minimise the effects of
that action. Already, the recent demands put upon rental
housing has removed from the market those many houses rented
out by owner-occupiers who are off overseas for just a year
or two. The expense of making the house compliant now exceed
the return. Overtime, if the current trends continue, more
and more landlords will simply retire by either selling up
or leaving their properties vacant.
“Some see this as a welcome trend. I disagree,” says Mr Lewis, “I make a profit out of my rentals, and the Government gets a share of that profit from the tax I pay. Conversely, one observer has calculated that the Government makes an average loss of around $100 per week on every HNZ dwelling. The Government seems to be a poor and inefficient landlord.
Can our society afford to subsidise each and every tenant at this level if all private rentals are driven from the market?
Only time will tell.”
ENDS